Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
8,141 results
2.04s
Victus 1, Inc. v. Stocky's World Famous Pizza, Inc.
256 So. 3d 1146 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Sep 26, 2018
A contract is formed by the consent of the parties established through offer and acceptance. La. C.C. art. 1927. … Able stated, "I have a qualified buyer willing to offer you $450k for your place. Are you interested?" Ms.
Cited 6 timesPublished16 La.App. 3 Cir. 839 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Aug 2, 2017
I29Uncontradicted testimony at trial .established that Mr. … The deposition testimony" of Prenitiss McLeod, a Placid Oil plant supervisor con-" clusively establishes that Placid Oil had knowledge at the time Mr. | .
Cited 11 timesPublishedState of Louisiana v. Murphy Cormier General Contractors,inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 3, 2015
The facts of this case are clearly distinguishable from Showboat. … The Code also sets forth in La.Civ.Code art. 1927: A contract is formed by the consent of the parties established through offer and acceptance.
Cited 0 timesUnknown951 So. 2d 274 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 28, 2006
DAMAGES (Assignment of Error No. 4) DOTD argues on appeal that the evidence did not establish that Mr. … In order to reverse a fact finder's determination of fact, an appellate court must find from the record that a reasonable factual basis does not exist for the finding and that the record establishes that the finding is clearly
Cited 12 timesPublished156 So. 2d 62 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jul 1, 1963
Alvin Doyle, Jr., who gave his occupation as an automobile consultant and accident analyst and who one of the plaintiffs attempted to have qualified as an expert witness, which was denied *65 by the Trial Judge. … It is the opinion of this Court that this case clearly comes within the principles set forth in Guidry v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedBarriere Const. v. Tangipahoa Parish Gov't
985 So. 2d 80 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 5, 2008
Barriere avers that while the district court and the Parish are correct that public property and public funds of a political subdivision are not subject to seizure to satisfy a judgment, [2] that does not immunize such entities … However, in Fontenot, supra, the Louisiana Supreme Court has clearly held that plaintiff is entitled to conduct a judgment debtor examination under the circumstances we find here.
Cited 0 timesPublished850 So. 2d 916 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 2003
The testimony of Brooks established that it was quite possible that the shear head pulled the wire down. … It is undisputed that Hayes made the unfortunate decision to unload a piece of machinery that he was not qualified to drive under an electric wire when he could have safely unloaded it in the clearing across the street.
Cited 7 timesPublished222 So. 3d 153 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 24, 2017
When the direct evidence is thus viewed, the facts established by the direct evidence and inferred from the circumstances established by that evidence must be sufficient for a rational trier of fact to conclude beyond a reasonable … Thomas testified to establish the chain of custody of the cellphone and laptop recovered by Ofc. Dupree from Haley’s vehicle. A copy of Sgt.
Cited 7 timesPublished13 La.App. 3 Cir. 950 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 2, 2014
Tekell was qualified as an expert in accident reconstruction. His key findings were that the point of impact was in the eastbound lane of travel, in which Mr. McGee had the right of way. He stated that Mr. … The jury clearly did not find Mr. McGee’s testimony believable.
Cited 0 timesPublishedShaw v. Caddo Parish School Bd.
347 So. 2d 39 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 23, 1977
Jefferson Parish School Board, 206 La. 317 , 19 So.2d 153, 167-8 (1943), the Supreme Court said: "There is nothing more firmly established in law than the principle that, within the limits of their authority, the power and … The School Board cannot arbitrarily or unreasonably deny a sabbatical leave to a teacher who qualifies under the statute, nor arbitrarily or unreasonably terminate a leave previously granted.
Cited 22 timesPublishedDexter Johnson Versus Madeline Jasmine - Individual Capacity
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jan 29, 2020
Johnson’s petition, on its face, clearly alleges that the behavior complained of occurred while Judge Jasmine was acting in her judicial capacity. Mr. … Deciding whether a petitioner has established a prima facie case is an exercise of discretion, and public officials are immune from liability for discretionary acts “when such acts are within the course and scope of their
Cited 0 timesUnknown2010 La.App. 1 Cir. 1812 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 10, 2011
Although Louisiana’s public policy strongly favors UM coverage and a liberal construction of |sthe UM statute, it is well-settled that a person who does not qualify as a liability insured under a policy of insurance is not … Thus, the argument that someone is insured for UM coverage simply because they occupy an insured vehicle and sustained injury due to an uninsured motorist is clearly contrary to well-established law.
Disagreed with by Brooks v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., 12 La.App. 3 Cir. 513 (2012)Cited 4 timesPublished799 So. 2d 1278 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 16, 2001
Domicile is a person’s principal domestic establishment, as contrasted to a business establishment. A man and wife are presumed to have the | gsame domicile. Robinson v. … This is where his family is established. Despite his frequent absences from home and his business in Baton Rouge, the evidence does not prove that he has any other domestic residence. Clearly, Mr.
Cited 5 timesPublishedMiller v. Loyola University of New Orleans
829 So. 2d 1057 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Sep 30, 2002
DISCUSSION Dismissal of a claim is justified only when the allegations of the petition itself clearly show that the plaintiff does not state a cause of action. Farmer v. Marriott Int'l, Inc., XXXX-XXXX, p. 2 (La. … Judicial oversight as to the reasonableness and quality of education would be an immense effort without ascertainable or clearly definable standards.
Cited 21 timesPublishedLOCAL 100, SVC. EMP. INTERN. UNION v. Smith
830 So. 2d 417 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 23, 2002
BPSB's policy manual regarding personnel records states that "all information contained in each employee's personnel file shall be considered confidential and shall not be transmitted to persons or agencies other than qualified … If a resume or application contains facts which would expose the applicant to public disgrace, are clearly private in nature, or are protected by law from disclosure, then that resume or application, or the private matters
Cited 10 timesPublishedFussell v. LA. BUSINESS COLLEGE OF MONROE
519 So. 2d 384 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jan 20, 1988
It was established that plaintiff, on one occasion, briefly allowed a tape recorder to play in a classroom. … We must conclude that the trial court's finding that plaintiff's suspension was justified is clearly wrong.
Cited 8 timesPublishedWhiddon v. Livingston Parish Council
809 So. 2d 421 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Sep 28, 2001
An employee in a workers' compensation action has the burden to establish a causal link between the work-related accident and the subsequent disabling condition. … The court in Chaisson concluded that in order for hearsay evidence to qualify as "competent evidence," the evidence must have "some degree of reliability and trust-worthiness" and be "the type that reasonable persons would
Cited 8 timesPublishedRed River Realty, Inc. v. Relmm Corp.
372 So. 2d 792 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 12, 1979
Defendant offered testimony of a highly qualified expert appraiser who testified the existence of defendant’s pipeline adjacent to plaintiff’s subdivision would have no effect upon the value of the plaintiff’s lots because … Id. p. 98 Hero requires plaintiff’s cause of action be established by convincing evidence.
Cited 3 timesPublishedState of Louisiana v. Trae Williams
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Sep 25, 2019
Thus, we will only tread on a jury's presumed acceptance of a witness's testimony when that testimony is implausible or clearly contrary to the evidence. … “In determining whether a statement qualifies as a present sense impression exception to the hearsay rule, the critical factor is whether the statement was made while the declarant was perceiving the event or immediately
Cited 0 timesPublishedFederated Rural Electric v. Simmons
568 So. 2d 644 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 3, 1990
Plaintiffs appealed urging, in essence, that the trial court’s factual findings and conclusions of law are clearly erroneous. … The testimony establishes that Simmons failed to pursue the openings which Sutton claimed to have found.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna