Case law

Slaughter v. Board of Supervisors of Southern University & Agricultural & Mechanical College

2010 La.App. 1 Cir. 1049 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Aug 2, 2011

Brown v. Navarre Chevrolet, Inc., 610 So.2d 165, 170 (La.App. 3d Cir.1992). … See Cupp v.

St. James Bank & Trust Co. v. Board of Commissioners

354 So. 2d 233 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jan 11, 1978

Before the warrant reached the State Comptroller however the Board of Commissioners stopped payment and the warrant was returned to the bank unpaid. … Smith v. Dubuclet, 23 La.Ann. 267 , and Boxwell v. Department of Highways, 203 La. 760 , 14 So.2d 627 , as well as authorities from other jurisdictions.

Aucoin v. Police Board of New Orleans

1 Teiss. 262 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 30, 1904

, from which he had been dismissed bj^'the Board. … course of action to be pursued by the Board must be decided by the Board.

Bell v. Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. of Louisiana

9 La.App. 5 Cir. 343 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jan 12, 2010

Bell stated that his 2005 actual bonus was set by Curtis Brown and the company’s board of directors. As the Division Manager, Mr. Bell determined the actual bonuses to be paid to Mr. Cam-marata and Mr. … Brown stated that bonuses for Mr. Cammarata and Mr. DeHarde were set by Mr. Bell and these were not *450 changed by the company’s board of directors. According to Mr. Brown, the 2005 bonuses that Mr. Cammarata and Mr.

Osborn Funeral Home, Inc. v. Louisiana State Board of Embalmers

216 So. 2d 145 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 31, 1968

Louisiana State Board of Embalmers v. Britton, 244 La. 756 , 154 So.2d 389 (1963). … In the case of City of Lafayette v.

Ducote v. LA. OFFICE OF EMPLOYMENT SEC., ETC.

401 So. 2d 1087 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Aug 13, 1981

without indicating why the Board's findings are wrong. … Flournoy v. Brown, La.App. 3 Cir., 140 So.2d 729 ; Robertson v. Brown, La.App. 1 Cir., 130 So.2d 226 ; Gilbert v. Hub City Iron Works, La.App. 3 Cir., 137 So.2d 359 ; Sewell v.

Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Administrator, Division of Employment Security of Department of Labor

203 So. 2d 924 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 30, 1967

We think the issue presented has been passed upon adversely to claimant in the following cases: Algiers Homestead Association v. Brown, 246 La. 738 , 167 So.2d 349 (1964); Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation v. … Brown, (La.App. 2d Cir. 1966) 188 So.2d 157 ; Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company v. Administrator, Division of Employment Security of Department of Labor, State of Louisiana, and Josephine S.

Jurisich v. Board of Levee Comm. of Orleans Levee Dist.

8 So. 2d 554 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 8, 1942

Trumata v. Board of Levee Commissioners, 3 La.App. 785 ; Lamport Holt v. Board of Commissioners of Port of New Orleans, 137 La. 784 , 69 So. 174 ; Kilberg v. Louisiana Highway Commission, 8 La.App. 441 ; Orgeron v. … Fouchaux v. Board of Commissioners, supra; Rome v. London Lancashire Indemnity Company, La.App., 169 So. 132 ; Omes v. Department of Conservation, supra; Henri Petetin, Inc., v.

Brown v. Monroe Mun. Fire & Civil Police Serv. Bd.

262 So. 3d 985 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 17, 2018

At the Board's meeting on October 31, 2017, the members reconsidered Cpl. Brown's application. The Board determined that Cpl. … Co., Inc. v. Plaquemines Par. Comm'n Council, supra .

Patient's Compensation Fund Oversight Board v. Succession of Hedgepeth

98 La.App. 1 Cir. 1695 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Sep 24, 1999

After hearing the matter, the trial court held that the PCF Board and the Fund are liable for the sum of $43,967.96, plus interest. The PCF Board and the Fund appeal that judgment. … LSA-R.S. 40:1299.42B(2); see Seagers v. Pailet, 95-924 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/15/96) , 680 So.2d 46 , writ denied, 96-2730 (La.1/6/97), 685 So.2d 117 .

Louisiana Hospital Service, Inc. v. Bookter

317 So. 2d 282 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 17, 1975

Horns v. Brown, 243 La. 936 , 148 So.2d 607, 609 (1963); Payne v. Antoines Restaurant, 217 So.2d 514 (4th La.App.1969); Heard v. Doyal, 259 So.2d 412 (2nd La.App. 1972). … Gardere v. Brown, 170 So.2d 758 (1st La.App.1964)." In the present case the allegation of misconduct against claimant as it is contained in the termination slip states: "4. REASON FOR SEPARATION.

Doane v. Board of Com'rs of Port of New Orleans

163 So. 717 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 4, 1935

See; also, Richey v. Union Paving Co. (La. App.) 151 So. 657 ; Jones v. Lake Charles Co. (La. App.) 153 So. 347 ; Stovall v. S. Bender Iron Co. (La. App.) 152 So. 387 ; Vilce v. Lake Charles Stevedores, Inc. (La. … See, also, Fussell v. Midland Co. (La. App.) 145 So. 698 ; Mathews v. Mexican Petroleum Corporation (La. App.) 153 So. 57 .

Foremost-McKesson, Inc. v. Doyal

353 So. 2d 360 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1977

We find inapposite the two cases, Brown v. Southern Airways, Inc., 170 So.2d 245 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1964) and Cooper v. Doyal, 205 So.2d 59 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1967), relied upon by Foremost-McKesson. … See Williams v. Brown, 157 So.2d 237 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1963). We find that Foremost-McKesson has not met its burden of proving misconduct. Gardere v. Brown, 170 So.2d 758 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1964).

City of Mandeville v. Randolph Brown

Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jan 14, 2020

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2019 KW 1179 VERSUS RANDOLPH BROWN … JAN 14 2020 In Re: Randolph Brown, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of

Dumez v. Houma Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board

341 So. 2d 1206 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 1976

DUMEZ v. HOUMA MUNICIPAL FIRE AND POLICE CIVIL SERVICE BOARD et al. No. 11016. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. December 20, 1976. Rehearing Denied February 14, 1977. Keith M. … Garland v. Torre (CA2 N.Y.1958) 259 F.2d 545 ; People v. Durrant, 116 Cal. 179 , 48 P. 75 (1897); Clein v. State, 52 So.2d 117 (Fla.1950); Pledger v. State, 77 Ga. 242 , 3 S.E. 320 .

Bloodworth v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University

98 La.App. 3 Cir. 1278 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 24, 1999

For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of James Lilley, et al. v. … Costs of this appeal are set in the amount of $473.40 and are to be divided equally between the plaintiffs and the defendant, Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University.

Town of Amite City v. Tangipahoa Parish School Board

11 La. App. 309 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 28, 1929

The town of Amite City, claims $470.95 of the Tangipahoa Parish School Board on account of water furnished by the town to the school board for use in the public school at Amite City, Louisiana. … We are not aware of any law which takes from the town the right to charge the school board for water, just as it charges any individual consumer in the town.

Lewallen v. Board of Levee Com'rs of Orleans L. Dist.

166 So. 2d 566 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jul 15, 1964

Munson v. BOARD OF LEVEE COMMISSIONERS OF ORLEANS LEVEE DISTRICT and Insurance Company of North America Companies. No. 1526. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. July 15, 1964. *567 Baham & Curet, Alvin G. … Co. v. J.F.D.L., Inc., La.App., 148 So.2d 857 ; Lee v. New Orleans Roosevelt Corporation, La.App., 106 So.2d 855 ; Jacques v. City Parking Service, La.App., 97 So.2d 78 , and Great American Indem. Co. v.

LeJeune v. Flash Truck Line, Inc.

353 So. 2d 296 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1977

In such instances, it is customary to place boards on the ground, create a ramp by placing boards at the front and rear of the float and roll the pipe or drill collars down the incline onto the boards in lieu of dropping … Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So.2d 716 (La.1973).

State ex rel. Maes v. New Orleans Police Board

6 La. App. 48 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jan 17, 1927

He appealed to the Police Board, but they affirmed the decision of the police superintendent on October 23, 1924. 5. … That neither the superintendent of police, nor the police board, wodld await the trial of the criminal charge, but dismissed him from the force. 7.