Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,145 results
0.90s
Supreme Court of Iowa · Jan 12, 2024
Aug. 21, 2013), as that case involved never- married parents seeking to establish a formal custody arrangement upon the father’s filing of a petition to establish custody, child support, and medical support. … This is well-established Iowa law. In Harder v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Harold K. Widdison
Supreme Court of Iowa · May 28, 2021
According to the commission, Widdison was clearly trying to mislead and intimidate witnesses for the opposing party the week before trial. … We established a three-step process for considering violations of this rule in Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Attorney Doe No. 792, 878 N.W.2d 189, 194–95 (Iowa 2016).
Cited 0 timesPublishedAFSCME Iowa Council 61 v. State of Iowa and Iowa Public Employment Relations Board
Supreme Court of Iowa · May 17, 2019
We do not depart from our established precedent in this case.” … Constitutional lines are clearly available. A collective bargaining statute in Wisconsin is one such example. See Wis. Educ. Ass’n Council v. Walker, 705 F.3d 640, 642–43 (7th Cir. 2013).
Cited 0 timesPublishedJoanne Cote v. Derby Insurance Agency, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, and Kevin Dorn, Individually
Supreme Court of Iowa · Mar 9, 2018
On the employee-numerosity issue, the district court appropriately decided Derby, as a corporation, did not qualify for the statutory exemption for “members of the employer’s family.” Iowa Code § 216.6(6)(a) (2014). … Cote clearly states that she thought Dorn was exposing himself in her presence during this timeframe . . . .
Cited 0 timesPublishedMichael Thomas Goodwin v. Iowa District Court for Davis County
Supreme Court of Iowa · Dec 20, 2019
Nothing in our training as judges qualifies us for that task, and nothing in Article III gives us that authority.”); Roper, 543 U.S. at 607, 125 S. … Combined with the citation to Roby, his general reference to the Iowa and United States Constitutions clearly implicate the cruel and unusual punishment clauses of both.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEMC Ins. Group, Inc. v. Gregory M. Shepard
Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 11, 2021
Shepard a second time” and alleging that “EMCI clearly has not followed the appraisal process set forth in the Iowa Business Corporations Act.” … This list was prepared by EMCI’s agent (AST) but still qualifies as a corporate record.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAmended September 13, 2016 State of Iowa v. Mar'yo D. Lindsey Jr.
Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 24, 2016
The question arises whether such behavior qualifies as furtive acts supporting reasonable suspicion, or whether the comments were mere assertions of the right to privacy. An illustrative case is T.S. v. … In this case, the facts clearly indicate the coach willfully grabbed the equipment bag and withheld it from the person Lindsey intended it to be entrusted to because the superintendent asked him to.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEMC Ins. Group, Inc. v. Gregory M. Shepard
Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 11, 2021
Shepard a second time” and alleging that “EMCI clearly has not followed the appraisal process set forth in the Iowa Business Corporations Act.” … This list was prepared by EMCI’s agent (AST) but still qualifies as a corporate record.
Cited 0 timesPublished879 N.W.2d 811 · Supreme Court of Iowa · May 27, 2016
Stephen Hart, a highly qualified expert witness in the field of clinical psychology with a special focus on the assessment of ■violence, risk, and psychopathic personality disorder. Dr. … Even though the federal standard of ineffective assistance established in Strickland v.
Cited 83 timesPublishedAmended September 1, 2016 State of Iowa v. Zyriah Henry Floyd Schlitter
Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 10, 2016
The claimant must establish both elements of the claim. Dempsey v. State, 860 N.W.2d 860, 868 (Iowa 2015). … Ultimately, they pressured Schlitter to qualify his previous unqualified strong denials by stating that he did not hurt his daughter “as far as he knew” and declaring that he was frustrated with his daughter’s behavior
Cited 0 timesPublishedState Of Iowa Vs. Jordan Kevin Lamar Bruegger
Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 2, 2009
The court in Lockyer declined to intervene, noting that the sentence did not violate “clearly established law.” Id. at 77, 123 S. Ct. at 1175, 155 L. Ed. 2d at 159. … Bruegger does not clearly distinguish between a facial attack or an attack as applied in his appeal.
Cited 0 timesPublished36 L.R.A. 434 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Apr 13, 1896
The liability of the maker was made to turn, when the fraud was established, on the fact of her negligence in placing her name to the paper. The case copies from Chipman v. … We think that the law clearly contemplates that the judge who tried the case should make the certificate, and that he must do so while still in office.
Cited 18 timesPublishedIowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Mason James Ouderkirk
845 N.W.2d 31 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Mar 28, 2014
Clearly, an attorney who creates sham documents to falsify what he knows to be the true state of affairs has committed a fraud. See Jacobsen, 511 N.W.2d at 615–16. … “An ostrich-like, head-in-the-sand approach” does not “immunize attorneys from an inference of actual knowledge.” Iowa Supreme Ct. Att’y Disciplinary Bd. v.
Cited 25 timesPublishedKenneth Lee Doss v. State of Iowa
Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 25, 2021
Here, Doss clearly asserted both federal and state constitutional claims, even though he presented only one constitutional standard.® “[A]n as-applied challenge alleges the statute is unconstitutional as applied to a particular … I will not establish, pursue or maintain any dating, romantic and/or sexual relationship(s). KE’ 0.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedState of Iowa v. Kevin Dwayne Woods, Jr.
Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 27, 2025
It may not be a “dead ringer,” but it is clearly a “historical analogue” for purposes of the Bruen analysis. Rahimi, 602 U.S. at 708–09 (Gorsuch, J., concurring) (quoting Bruen, 597 U.S. at 30). … This is a critical qualifier: carrying a firearm is beyond the protection of the Second Amendment when it is done for an unlawful purpose.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Iowa · Jun 30, 2021
By its terms, the Act clearly precludes PPH from participating in the CAPP and PREP programs. In 2017, PPH performed approximately 95% of all abortions in Iowa. … PPH must first establish it has a constitutional due process right to provide abortions before this condition can be considered unconstitutional.
Cited 0 timesPublished873 N.W.2d 714 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jan 8, 2016
Clearly, Res Judicata Reexamined, 57 Yale L.J. 339, 339–42 (1948) (discussing the differences between the traditional narrower view and the broader transactional approach). … Further, the mere fact the bad-faith claim could have been brought earlier clearly is not determinative. See, e.g., Westway, 314 N.W.2d at 401–02.
Cited 30 timesPublishedIn the Interest of T.H., Minor Child
Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 15, 2018
Juveniles adjudicated delinquent of a qualifying offense are considered “convicted” for registration purposes. Id. § 692A.101(7). … Mandatory registration for juveniles who have committed aggravated sexual offenses clearly has a rational connection to the nonpunitive goal of protecting the community, especially children, from subsequent sexual offenses
Cited 0 timesPublishedState of Iowa v. Levi Gibbs III
Supreme Court of Iowa · Apr 17, 2020
In Florida, stand-your- ground is an additional immunity created by the legislature that may be raised by the defendant in a separate pretrial hearing. See Fla. Stat. Ann. … It is a well-established principle that a party’s failure to sufficiently identify and brief an issue constitutes waiver of the issue. The failure to clearly identify an issue constitutes waiver. See Goode v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState of Iowa v. Archaletta Latrice Young
Supreme Court of Iowa · Apr 3, 2015
Rights that “ ‘would enlarge, and not curtail the rights of the people’ ” and would “ ‘put upon record every guarantee that could be legitimately placed there in order that Iowa . . . might . . . have the best and most clearly … While it may be that the “cases” language amounts to constitutional support for a right to counsel in qualifying civil contexts, it also strongly suggests that if a right to counsel exists in civil cases in which “liberty
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna