Case law

Amended August 15, 2017 State of Iowa v. Martha Aracely Martinez

Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 9, 2017

According to the Department of Homeland Security’s website, any conviction under federal, state, or local law qualifies, and only “[i]mmigration-related offenses” are excluded. See U.S. … This language clearly prohibits a state prosecution based on false statements within the I-9 form itself.

Stromberg v. Alexander

171 Iowa 707 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 4, 1915

The original of this deed has been certified and clearly shows that the word “three” and the figure “3” in the description have been altered by erasures. … A witness for plaintiffs, whom we hold qualified to give his opinion, testified that the value of the Texas land was not to exceed $5.00 per acre, and this is not disputed by any other witness in the case.

Des Moines Bank & Trust Co. v. George M. Bechtel & Co.

243 Iowa 1007 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jan 8, 1952

Bechtel as qualifying shares. … The account was established and maintained in secrecy.

Joe Comes, Riley Paint, Inc., An Iowa Corporation, Skeffington's Formal Wear Of Iowa, Inc., An Iowa Corporation, And Patricia Anne Larsen Vs. Microsoft Corporation, A Washington Corporation

Supreme Court of Iowa · Nov 20, 2009

Although our decisions clearly require a showing of “good cause” when a party seeks an order protecting sensitive information, we have not previously been 6Unlike the Iowa protective order, the MDL protective … The Canadian plaintiffs do not claim the documents and data which Microsoft seeks to protect do not qualify as trade secrets nor do they seek the release of the information to the general public.

Amended June 16, 2017 State of Iowa v. Martha Aracely Martinez

Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 9, 2017

According to the Department of Homeland Security’s website, any conviction under federal, state, or local law qualifies, and only “[i]mmigration-related offenses” are excluded. See U.S. … This language clearly prohibits a state prosecution based on false statements within the I-9 form itself.

State of Iowa v. Martha Aracely Martinez

Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 9, 2017

According to the Department of Homeland Security’s website, any conviction under federal, state, or local law qualifies, and only “[i]mmigration-related offenses” are excluded. See U.S. … This language clearly prohibits a state prosecution based on false statements within the I-9 form itself.

Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, Inc., and Jill Meadows, M.D. v. Kim Reynolds ex rel. State of Iowa and Iowa Board of Medicine

Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 17, 2022

I, § 6 (the privileges and immunities clause). 117Planned Parenthood II, 915 N.W.2d at 244. 118Id. at 245. 119Id. … Interestingly, the Belous court did not clearly establish the constitutional basis of reproductive autonomy in California. See also Comm. to Def. Reprod. Rts. v.

Lscp, Lllp v. Courtney M. Kay-Decker, Director, Iowa Department of Revenue

861 N.W.2d 846 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Apr 10, 2015

Article I, section 6 provides, “All laws of a general nature shall have a uniform operation; the general assembly shall not grant to any citizen, or class of citizens, privileges or immunities, which, upon the same terms … Nonetheless, the replacement tax on natural gas delivery clearly has a nexus to Iowa because it involves taxation of natural gas delivered into Iowa for consumption here.

State v. Bruegger

773 N.W.2d 862 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 2, 2009

The court in Lockyer declined to intervene, noting that the sentence did not violate “clearly established law.” Id. at 77 , 123 S.Ct. at 1175, 155 L.Ed.2d at 159. … Wood-son established a prerequisite legal requirement in all death penalty cases.

Toby Thornton v. American Interstate Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Iowa · Feb 28, 2020

On the other hand, Thornton claims the evidence clearly establishes that American Interstate showed disregard for the rights of Thornton by  9 failing to see that he received a replacement … American Interstate established reserves reflecting that Thornton was PTD.

Economy Roofing & Insulating Co. v. Zumaris

538 N.W.2d 641 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Sep 20, 1995

The agreement clearly did not prevent Alcoa from using other contractors. In these circumstances, there was a lack of mutuality of obligation. … The evidence was insufficient to establish the contractual element of the intentional interference with contract claim.

Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, Inc., and Jill Meadows, M.D. v. Kim Reynolds ex rel. State of Iowa and Iowa Board of Medicine

Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 17, 2022

I, § 6 (the privileges and immunities clause). 117Planned Parenthood II, 915 N.W.2d at 244. 118Id. at 245. 119Id. … Interestingly, the Belous court did not clearly establish the constitutional basis of reproductive autonomy in California. See also Comm. to Def. Reprod. Rts. v.

State of Iowa v. Darreon Corta Draine

Supreme Court of Iowa · Dec 6, 2019

Standing alone, it seems clear that in most cases ADHD would not be sufficient to establish incompetence. … Rev. 488, 498–502, 505–06 (2007) [hereinafter Wingrove] (noting that juveniles are psychosocially impaired as compared to adults and that some psychosocial factors clearly implicate legal competence of juveniles).

Fuller v. Illinois Central Railroad

186 Iowa 686 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jul 2, 1919

In view of the points made, and the arguments, an examination of the evidence is required, and we shall state so much thereof as seems necessary, without, however, attempting to give the circumstances which tend to qualify … Clearly, the instruction in question is not vulnerable .to the objection made; for it rea(l&> “that it is reasonably certain he will hereafter suffer,” etc., — not what he may suffer.

State v. Bevins

210 Iowa 1031 · Supreme Court of Iowa · May 16, 1930

Hence, appellant concludes that the entire law must fail, under the established theories of statutory construction. … Materiality, therefore, of the previous deposits clearly appears. As before said, the written deposit records contained previous as well as subsequent deposits.

Bruggeman v. Illinois Central Railroad

147 Iowa 187 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Dec 20, 1909

Plaintiff called an engineer, who was qualified as an expert, and propounded to him the following question: “Q.. Mr. Kerney, I call your attention to that Toeterville track. … From one point of view it is clearly erroneous, as said by this court in Adams v. R. R. Co., 138 Iowa, 487 .

State of Iowa v. Maurice D. Angel and Kemia B. McDowell

893 N.W.2d 904 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Apr 21, 2017

At the suppression hearing five months after the warrant was issued, the issuing judge testified that he did not clearly remember the circumstances under which the warrant was issued. Id. … Rejection of extrinsic evidence to establish oath or affirmation.

Jacob Lee Schmidt v. State of Iowa

909 N.W.2d 778 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Mar 23, 2018

Additionally, the recantation has the potential to qualify as material evidence that probably would have changed the outcome of Schmidt’s case. … In Carroll, we accurately said that this rule is “well-established.” Id.

IBP, Inc. Vs. Lee Burress

Supreme Court of Iowa · Mar 5, 2010

resulting from the establishment of that fact are understood to be serious and of great importance. … When faced with a procedural situation the agency rules do not clearly address, this court has been guided by general provisions. See Aluminum Co. of Am. v.

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Mary Ellen Kennedy

837 N.W.2d 659 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Sep 27, 2013

The court directed Kennedy to prepare a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) “which will divide both of the accounts equally awarding [Stephanie Robinson] 50 percent of the balance.” … Unlike here, the Board in McCarthy established serious trust account violations.