Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersiowa

3,145 results

0.30s

  • Planned Parenthood of the Heartland and Jill Meadows v. Kimberly K. Reynolds ex rel. State of Iowa and Iowa Board of Medicine

    Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 29, 2018

    Turning to article I, section 6, it consists of two clauses: one requiring uniformity and the other prohibiting special privileges and immunities. Iowa Const. art. I, § 6. … App. 1993) (finding no facial invalidity under Ohio Constitution of a law establishing a 24-hour waiting period).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Planned Parenthood of the Heartland and Jill Meadows v. Kimberly K. Reynolds ex rel. State of Iowa and Iowa Board of Medicine

    Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 29, 2018

    Turning to article I, section 6, it consists of two clauses: one requiring uniformity and the other prohibiting special privileges and immunities. Iowa Const. art. I, § 6. … App. 1993) (finding no facial invalidity under Ohio Constitution of a law establishing a 24-hour waiting period).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Mosher

    128 Iowa 82 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Apr 5, 1905

    The statute does not specify that anything else shall be included in the order, and the inference clearly deducible is that the' attorney,- in preparing the accusation, may include any matter he may deem appropriate, and … The recital of these facts establishes the charge of unprofessional conduct toward the court as well as his clients, regardless of whether the order obtained was against their, interest.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • State of Iowa v. Marvis Latrell Jackson

    878 N.W.2d 422 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Apr 29, 2016

    In Rodriguez , the Court-clearly established that the government has two potential avenues for meeting its burden of proving the effectiveness of third-party consent. ■ First, the government may introduce evidence demonstrating … Last, the qualified statements made by Olson clearly do not alert officers that he knew there were items in his bedroom that did not belong to him, namely the backpack.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • State v. Bruntlett

    240 Iowa 338 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Mar 8, 1949

    Other decisions holding that when insanity is once established it wiil be presumed to continue until the contrary is shown, and the burden is then cast upon the one who asserts a return to sanity to establish it by competent … Among them I find no case where the record which came to us pointed more clearly to mental derangement than does the instant one.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Addis v. Applegate

    171 Iowa 150 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Sep 21, 1915

    If the legislature has by amendment given certain officers an immunity, it must be assumed that it needed the act of the legislature to create such immunity; the Supreme Court is not to create it. … The very words used in the statutes *194 prove that such distinction is made, more clearly than any argument can.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • In Re Grahlman's Will

    248 Iowa 535 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Mar 5, 1957

    In many cases, and especially in recent decisions, we have established a definite test concerning testamentary capacity. … We have approved this general test for many years, but recently it was clearly stated in: In re Estate of Rogers, 242 Iowa 627, 630 , 47 N.W.2d 818 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State of Iowa v. Isaac Andrew Baldon III

    829 N.W.2d 785 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Apr 19, 2013

    Cullison applied mostly federal and out-of-state authority to conclude that “an Iowa State parolee’s Fourth Amendment rights, privileges and immunities, [should] be accorded the same recognition as any other person.” 173 … Clearly we do. Nor is the issue whether we are the final arbiters of the meaning of that constitution. Clearly we are.

    Cited 96 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Coughlin

    259 Iowa 1163 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Dec 13, 1966

    In Spurbeck, we said: "At the outset we state some well-established general principles pertinent in all considerations of constitutional questions. … of the original laudable purpose of juvenile courts, studies and critiques in recent years raise serious questions as to whether actual performance measures well enough against theoretical purpose to make tolerable the immunity

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Heartland Express, Inc. v. Terry

    631 N.W.2d 260 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jul 5, 2001

    This was clearly Georgia when Terry accepted Heartland’s offer of employment. As the following discussion shows, the district court was right on the mark. … As Heartland correctly notes, there is a lack of evidence establishing that Heartland approved the application in Iowa.

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • State of Iowa v. Gowun Park

    Supreme Court of Iowa · Jan 27, 2023

    Instead, Detective Morgan told Park that the doctors were “trying to 1Park clearly understood the Miranda warnings. … Asay did not offer a forensic opinion and testified she was not qualified to do so. 30 470 U.S. 298, 305 (1985).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Adoption of Moriarty

    260 Iowa 1279 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jul 11, 1967

    The evidence submitted to the trial court establishes no real factual disputes. David D. … The rule is now well established that mere right of visitation is not enough to require consent of a divorced parent.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Roger Blasdell v. Linnhaven, Inc. and Accident Fund National Insurance Company/United Heartland

    Supreme Court of Iowa · Apr 7, 2023

    Substantial evidence is “the quantity and quality of evidence that would be deemed sufficient by a neutral, detached, and reasonable person, to establish the fact at issue when the consequences resulting from the establishment … “The legislature clearly vested the agency with the application of the law to the facts.” Drake Univ. v. Davis, 769 N.W.2d 176, 183 (Iowa 2009) (citing Iowa Code §§ 86.14–.24 (2003)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board Of Directors Of Ames Community School District Vs. Dennis Cullinan

    Supreme Court of Iowa · Feb 29, 2008

    The players’ statements were made under circumstances that tended to establish credibility. … The board concluded that both bases for termination had been established.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re the Marriage of Weidner

    338 N.W.2d 351 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Sep 21, 1983

    Clearly, however, our statutes now express a preference for joint custody over other custodial arrangements and do not allow one-party vetoes. … That code section is not here controlling because the evidence does not establish that Exhibit “9” was such an agreement.

    Cited 168 timesPublished
  • Wolfe v. Graether

    389 N.W.2d 643 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jul 18, 1986

    Clearly, the extrinsic evidence offered on the issues of what was intended by the contract clauses permitting termination by involuntary retirement or where the employment situation was intolerable was for purposes of interpretation … Stewart, Wimer & Bump, P.C., 336 N.W.2d 731, 737 (Iowa 1983), we conclude that, if, on retrial of this action, Graether again requests an instruction on the qualified privilege of corporate officers and directors to act with

    Cited 50 timesPublished
  • State v. Campbell

    714 N.W.2d 622 · Supreme Court of Iowa · May 19, 2006

    This was clearly a misstatement of the applicability of rule 5.404(6). It is not a rule pertaining to witnesses, but, rather, a rule pertaining to evidence of past conduct in order to prove subsequent conduct. … In criminal cases the defendant has a qualified constitutional right to show the bias of government witnesses. 1 John W. Strong, McCormick on Evidence § 39, at 144-45 (5th ed. 1999) (citing Davis v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • State v. O'CONNELL

    275 N.W.2d 197 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Feb 21, 1979

    Here defendant’s motion was titled and clearly intended to be treated only as a motion in limine. However, trial court directed the filing of briefs and held a hearing on the record. … When the testimony relating to the significance of the green belt and the art of karate was offered through a qualified police officer who found the uniform in the mobile home, defendant’s relevancy objection was overruled

    Cited 109 timesPublished
  • State Of Iowa Vs. Luis Fernando Ortiz

    Supreme Court of Iowa · May 29, 2009

    First, the State failed to establish Ortiz spoke and understood English. … I have not received any promise of immunity of any other type and they have not used any physically [sic.] force or pressionment [sic.] of any to force me to make a statement.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ex parte Holman

    28 Iowa 88 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 11, 1869

    This is familiar law, and it has been so long settled that it is not necessary to refer to the many authorities establishing it. … This is a doctrine too well established to require the citation of authorities in its support, and is of constant application.

    Cited 28 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.