Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersilsd

1,362 results

0.81s

  • Jenkins v. Reaves

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Aug 1, 2024

    To seek a preliminary injunction, a plaintiff must establish: a likelihood of success on the merits of his claim; no adequate remedy at law; and irreparable harm without the injunctive relief. See Mays v. … Based on the allegations in the Complaint, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Falcon v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons

    852 F. Supp. 1413 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · May 10, 1994

    As noted earlier, under Reed, 984 F.2d at 211 , the petitioner must establish that his custody at USP-Marion has prejudiced him. … It follows that the judiciary, through a writ of mandamus, cannot compel a federal official to perform any function unless the official is clearly directed by law to do so. Save the Dunes Council v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Jordan v. Brookhart

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Dec 13, 2023

    Any portion of a complaint that is legally frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or asks for money damages from a defendant who by law is immune from such relief must be dismissed … Jordan explained to Brown that the cold diet trays, which are served separately from the meat entrée, would qualify as a vegetarian kosher diet and that he was willing to accept an extra cold diet tray in place of a kosher

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Broadwater v. Heidtman Steel Products, Inc.

    182 F. Supp. 2d 705 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jan 9, 2002

    Clearly, allegations regarding conduct relating to the November 1, 1999 suspension, presented in Broadwater’s December 27, 2000 complaint in this Court, would be time-barred — unless they are saved by an equitable doctrine … Those events qualify as adverse job actions and satisfy the second element of the retaliation prima facie case. See Smart, 89 F.3d at 441 (“Adverse employment action has been defined quite broadly in this circuit....

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Green v. Meeks

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Feb 1, 2023

    As there is “no work product immunity for documents prepared in the ordinary course of business rather than for litigation purposes,” the Court cannot determine that the documents qualify for the privilege asserted. … As the documents do not qualify for the privileges asserted, the requests to compel these documents is granted.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Amburg-Wyhs v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Sep 23, 2024

    Legal Standard To qualify for DIB, a claimant must be disabled within the meaning of the applicable statutes. … Plaintiff asserts the record clearly established that she has severe impairments of carpal tunnel syndrome bilaterally and right ulnar neuropathy.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Williams Jr v. Luking

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · May 26, 2022

    Thus, neither Roberts nor Robinson clearly establishes whether surviving a § 1915A screening forecloses a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. … Lastly, a plaintiff may demonstrate liability by establishing a widespread custom. Id.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • American River Transportation Co. v. Phelps

    189 F. Supp. 2d 835 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Aug 2, 2001

    Once an injured seaman establishes that negligence or unseaworthiness caused his injuries, the burden shifts to the vessel owner to establish lack of privity or knowledge of the dangerous condition that caused the injury. … Clearly, however, ARTCO had no role in the oil getting or staying there and had no knowledge of its presence. 35.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sweet v. BJC Health System

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jun 29, 2021

    information in a data breach generally fails a establish such a substantial risk. … In Dieffenbach, the Seventh Circuit previously held that monthly payments for credit monitoring services did qualify as compensable injury under the ICFA. 887 F.3d at 828.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Thompkins

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jul 22, 2026

    App’x 390 (7th Cir. 2018) (a court may dismiss a complaint upon screening if it is clearly barred by the statute of limitations). … The rigorous causation standard for Monell claims demands that an inmate establish a direct causal link between the challenged municipal action and the violation of his rights.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Columbus Mckinnon Corp. v. Travelers Indem. Co.

    367 F. Supp. 3d 123 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Sep 28, 2018

    insured's "self-insurance should be deemed co-insurance with [the insurer's] policy, such that the defense ... costs ... should be split 50/50"); see also id. at 401 , 749 N.Y.S.2d 402 (noting that "self-insurance does not qualify … Co. , 202 A.D.2d 816 , 817, 609 N.Y.S.2d 106 (3rd Dep't 1994) ("Clearly, ... the failure to cooperate vitiates the policy and entitles the insurer to disclaim any liability to defend.").

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Perez v. Lawrence

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jan 26, 2021

    Any portion of the Complaint that is legally frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim for relief, or requests money damages from an immune defendant must be dismissed. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). … (Doc. 1, p. 9). 1 The date of this encounter with Nurse Locke is unclear; Plaintiff states it was on March 22, 2019, but that is clearly an error. (Doc. 1, p. 8).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Peacock v. Wexford Health Source, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jan 3, 2024

    Any portion of a complaint that is legally frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or asks for money damages from a defendant who by law is immune from such relief must be dismissed … Plaintiff has clearly attempted to retain his own counsel, but this is not the end of the inquiry.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hoskins v. Chapman

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jun 1, 2022

    Any portion of a Complaint that is legally frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim for relief, or requests money damages from an immune defendant must be dismissed. … It is well established that, “unless there are exceptional circumstances, judicial rulings are grounds for appeal, not disqualification.” Id. at 355.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bailey v. Williams

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Dec 4, 2020

    Days later, on June 23, 2016, the United States Supreme Court decided Mathis, which clarified when and how the categorical approach should be applied to determine whether prior convictions qualifies to support sentencing … He clearly could have raised this argument in both of those proceedings.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Neal, Jr. v. United States

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Mar 15, 2023

    The argument was neither obvious nor clearly stronger than the arguments Christiansen raised on appeal, especially considering it would have faced plain error review. … Ct. 1239 (2021), later established as insufficient to support that enhancement under the categorical approach.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Pitts v. Willis

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Dec 14, 2021

    Any portion of a Complaint that is legally frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim for relief, or requests money damages from an immune defendant must be dismissed. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). … Finally, based on the allegations in the Complaint, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gutierrez v. Ski

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jul 31, 2025

    Any portion of a complaint that is legally frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or asks for money damages from a defendant who by law is immune from such relief must be dismissed … Because Gutierrez’s claims involve his medical care, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter the Court’s standard HIPAA Qualified Protective Order.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gutierrez v. Barwick

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jul 30, 2025

    Any portion of a complaint that is legally frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or asks for money damages from a defendant who by law is immune from such relief must be dismissed … Because Gutierrez’s claims involve his medical care, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter the Court’s standard HIPAA Qualified Protective Order.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Perozzi v. Berryhill

    287 F. Supp. 3d 471 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Mar 5, 2018

    An impairment that manifests only some of those criteria, no matter how severely, does not qualify." Sullivan v. … The reasons given also qualify as "good reasons" for the weight ultimately given Dr. Gaughan's opinions. Greek , 802 F.3d at 375 (citing Burgess , 537 F.3d at 129-30 ).

    Cited 51 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.