Case law

Rucker v. Johnson

724 F. Supp. 568 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 29, 1989

If the law supporting such relief was not clearly established as of May 1988, defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. See Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635 , 107 S.Ct. 3034 , 97 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987); Rakovich v. … Wykoff 's unsupported holding did not clearly establish the law, especially in light of the other precedents discussed. [5] Defendants, therefore would be qualifiedly immune.

S.J. Ex Rel. S.J. v. Perspectives Charter School

685 F. Supp. 2d 847 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 9, 2010

To overcome qualified immunity, a plaintiff must show that the alleged conduct gives rise to a constitutional violation, and that the right was clearly established at the time of the violation. See Tun v. … Spencer and Frye outside a ‘clearly established’ constitutional norm, they are entitled to qualified immunity”) (citing Doe, 631 F.2d. at 92-93 ).

Bond v. AGUINALDO

265 F. Supp. 2d 926 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 29, 2003

Qualified Immunity Qualified immunity protects government officials 3 from civil liability when performing discretionary functions so long as their conduct does not violate clearly established constitutional rights. … (rejecting qualified immunity defense at pleading stage because plaintiff sufficiently alleged denial or delay of medical treatment, which is a clearly established constitutional violation). IV. Conclusion Dr.

Santana v. Cook County Board of Review

700 F. Supp. 2d 1023 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 30, 2010

Commissioners and Board Employees also claim qualified immunity, which shields officials from damages liability “insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a … To defeat such asserted qualified immunity a plaintiff must show 6 both (1) the violation of a constitutional right and (2) that the right was “clearly established at the time of the defendant’s misconduct” (concepts that

Wright v. Gualandri

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 21, 2021

If Gualandri is contending that the record reflects at this point that he is entitled to qualified immunity because "a reasonable officer could have believed [the arrest] to be lawful, in light of clearly established law … Rohde, 778 F.3d 556, 560 (7th Cir. 2015) ("[F]abricating evidence . . . violates a clearly established constitutional right, such that qualified immunity does not shield the manufacturers of such evidence from liability

Willis v. Cook County

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 20, 2024

clearly established law.’” … For the purposes of qualified immunity, a detainee’s constitutional right to receive adequate medical care is clearly established law. Board v.

Prokop v. Hileman

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 2, 2022

“The doctrine of qualified immunity protects government officials ‘from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable … Luna, 577 U.S. 7, 12 (2015) (“The dispositive question” for qualified immunity is “whether the violative nature of particular conduct is clearly established.”)

Mendoza v. Herrera

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 14, 2020

Qualified immunity “shields officials from civil liability so long as their conduct ‘does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.’” … In response to defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to qualified immunity, plaintiff does not identify a case that clearly establishes that his constitutional rights were violated.

Barrows v. Larry

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 12, 2020

Qualified Immunity Defendants argue in the alternative that they are entitled to summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds. (Dkt. 119-1, at 9-10). … established right that overcomes qualified immunity); Cavalieri v.

Gillespie v. Boudreau

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 29, 2025

denied qualified immunity because it was clearly established— as of 1987—that prosecutors violate the Constitution when they fabricate evidence introduced at trial. 682 F.3d at 585–86 (emphasis added); see also Smith v. … clearly establish the right).

Lankamer v. Lalley

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 9, 2024

“Qualified immunity attaches when an official’s conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” White v. … That right is clearly established.”); Snukis, 2022 WL 2305697, at *7 (denying qualified immunity at the motion to dismiss stage because “it was clearly established that Snukis had a Fourth Amendment right to prompt medical

Liggins v. Reicks

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 8, 2021

App’x 555, 558 (7th Cir. 2001) to argue that limited discovery is appropriate after the defense of qualified immunity is asserted. … See Crawford-El, 523 U.S. at 598 (stating that before allowing discovery, the district court should determine whether, assuming the truth of the plaintiff’s allegations, the official’s conduct violated clearly established

Arriaga v. Dart

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 29, 2021

Qualified immunity “protects government officials from civil liability when performing discretionary functions so long as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of … To overcome a qualified immunity defense, plaintiff’s “allegations [must] make out a deprivation of a constitutional right,” and “the right at issue [must be] clearly established at the time of the defendant's

Aska

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 23, 2026

Although it’s true that qualified immunity provides “ample protection to all but the plainly incompetent or those who knowingly violate the law,” it is clearly established that use of excessive force during an arrest is … City of Albuquerque, 813 F.3d 912, 929 n.9 (10th Cir. 2015) (“A circuit split will not satisfy the clearly established prong of qualified immunity.”) with Williams v.

Sanchez v. The Village of Wheeling

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 30, 2020

Evanston Defendants seek qualified immunity for Detective Bush, arguing that the right at issue was not clearly established. Doc. 49 at 4-9. … To avoid qualified immunity, Sánchez must show that the right was clearly established “in a particularized sense, rather than at a high level of generality.” Alicea v.

Tyehimba v. Cook County D.O.C.

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 15, 2024

To defeat a qualified immunity defense, a plaintiff must plead facts that show “(1) that the official violated a statutory or constitutional right, and (2) that the right was clearly established at the time of the challenged … of clearly established law.”)

Bradley v. DuPage County Sheriff's Office

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 29, 2021

To determine whether qualified immunity applies, the court asks two questions: (1) whether Kuschell violated a constitutional right; and (2) whether that “right was ‘clearly established’ at the time of the challenged conduct … any clearly established right.”

Suri

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 14, 2026

When it comes to qualified immunity, “[a] prison official is immune from suit if the constitutional right at issue was not clearly established at the time of the violation, and thus a reasonable officer would not have known … The right to be protected from inmate-on-inmate violence was clearly established at the time of the complained-of events and has been clearly established for decades. See, e.g., Mayoral v.

Woods v. Adamski

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 24, 2020

Qualified immunity “protects government officials from liability for civil damages if their actions did not violate ‘clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.’ … immunity”); Clash, 77 F.3d at 1048 (denying summary judgment on qualified immunity claim because the Court lacked the “given facts” that either do or do not show a violation of “clearly established law”); Pabon v.

Dupree v. Village of Bellwood

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 13, 2022

Even if they did, they maintain that they are entitled to qualified immunity because none of their actions violated clearly established law. … Officers sometimes make mistakes; qualified immunity works to immunize them from damages suits arising from those mistakes so long as there is no transgression of clearly established law.