Case law

A, B, C, D, E, F v. Jiang Zemin

282 F. Supp. 2d 875 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 12, 2003

Corp. v. … But he traveled to Minnesota to board the Icelandair flight; it was in that state, not Illinois, where he was prevented from boarding.

Lumpkins-Benford v. Allstate Insurance

987 F. Supp. 2d 807 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 5, 2013

Brown v. Advocate S. Suburban Hosp., 700 F.3d 1101, 1106 (7th Cir.2012) (“the plaintiffs have not pointed to any [similarly situated employee who did not engage in protected activity]. … See Brown, 700 F.3d at 1108 (“plaintiffs must also provide evidence that a retaliatory animus motivated the denials”).

Holcomb v. Freedman Anselmo Lindberg, LLC

245 F. Supp. 3d 998 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 24, 2017

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, 477 U.S. 242, 255 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); Grochocinski v. Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw, LLP, 719 F.3d 785, 794 (7th Cir. 2013). … See Tobias v.

Williams v. Kelly

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 23, 2018

Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 219 (2007); see also Porter v. … Board of Cnty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997). Although Williams has not established that Dr.

Henyard

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 16, 2026

Any application may be ordered by the President or the Village Board to be presented to and approved by such Board before issuance or approval of the license, and the Board may overrule the decision of the President in … The Village Board had final approval authority and could overrule any decision Henyard made.

United States v. Patterson

171 F. Supp. 2d 804 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 8, 2001

The day before the theft, Patterson told the CW that Smith was on board. On the day of the theft, Patterson told the CW that he was going to pick up Smith. … Patterson’s statement that Smith was “on board” is corroborated by Smith’s presence and participation in the theft. See United States v. Petty, 132 F.3d 373, 380 (7th Cir.1997).

Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Company

403 F. Supp. 527 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 27, 1975

Metro Cable Co. v. CATV of Rockford, 516 F.2d 220 (7th Cir. 1975). See also Mach-Tronics Inc. v. … As explained in Adkins v.

Gerba v. National Hellenic Museum

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 21, 2018

At the time Plaintiff requested information from Adams, he was preparing to create a Board Contribution Report to track the 2016 contributions of each of Defendant’s board members to the Museum. … His report distinguished between board members’ personal/individual contributions and contributions by the board members’ companies/organizations.

Pollion v. Lewis

320 F. Supp. 1343 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 25, 1970

Board of Higher Education, 350 U.S. 551 , 76 S.Ct. 637 , 100 L.Ed. 692 ). The ability to utilize this particular means of mobility is also susceptible to equation to travel generally, whether international (cf. Kent v. … Slochower v. Board of Higher Education, 350 U.S. 551, 557 , 76 S.Ct. 637 , 100 L.Ed. 692 ; Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath, 341 U.S. 123 , 71 S.Ct. 624 , 95 L.Ed. 817 .

Walden v. City of Chicago

846 F. Supp. 2d 963 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 6, 2012

See Soltys v. … Brown v. City of Chi., 599 F.3d 772, 776, n. 2 (7th Cir.2010) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). .

Crespo v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America

294 F. Supp. 2d 980 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 18, 2003

Halpin v. W.W. … Brown v. Retirement Comm. of Briggs & Stratton Retirement Plan, 797 F.2d 521, 534 (7th Cir.1986). B.

Murawski v. Tri Service, Inc.

36 F. Supp. 2d 1041 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 12, 1999

Recently, the Seventh Circuit held that "direct evidence may not rely on 'inference or presumption.’ ” see Brown v. Runyon, 2 F.Supp.2d 1062, 1067 (N.D.Ill.1998)(citing Cowan v. Glenbrook Sec. … Brown, 2 F.Supp.2d at 1067 (see also Jones v. City of Elgin, No. 96-C6920, 1998 WL 259538 , at *7-8 (N.D.Ill.

Miyano MacHinery USA, Inc. v. Miyanohitec MacHinery, Inc.

576 F. Supp. 2d 868 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 5, 2008

Similarly, the Trademark and Trial Appeals Board has stated that a change in a mark is permissible so long as it does not involve a “material alteration.” PARIS GLOVE OF CANADA v. … Compare Sullivan v.

Kaplan v. Lehman Brothers

250 F. Supp. 562 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 25, 1966

Since the plaintiffs have the legality of the Exchange rules and their prescribed rates of commission sole yon the ground that fixed rates are illegal, the holding in Silver v. … See Board of Trade of Kansas City v. United States, 314 U.S. 534, 546 , 62 S.Ct. 366 , 86 L.Ed. 432 (1942).

Hall v. International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 27, 2023

For the first time in 20 years, the board closed executive board meetings to business managers, including Hall. Compl. ¶ 28. … It gives the council ‘power to hear appeals from the General Executive Board’ and to decide other matters properly coming before it.” Walsche v. Sherlock, 159 A. 661, 665 (N.J.

Home Comp Care, Inc. v. United States Department of Health & Human Services (In Re Home Comp Care, Inc.)

221 B.R. 202 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 1, 1998

. §§ 1395f(b), 1395h, 1395x(v); 42 C.F.R. § 413.1 et seq. … determination as to the total amount of reimbursement due for the entire year, as reflected in an NPR, may providers request a hearing with respect to such determination and obtain a decision from the Provider Reimbursement Review Board

Roberts v. County of Cook

213 F. Supp. 2d 882 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 5, 2002

See, e.g., Kozlowski v. Fry, No. 00 C 5296, 2001 WL 109545 , at *3 (N.D.Ill. Feb. 5, 2001) (Keys, Mag.) (holding that Cook County Board does not have a separate identity from Cook County). … See Knox v.

McRoy v. Sheahan

383 F. Supp. 2d 1010 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 9, 2005

Board v. Farnham, 394 F.3d 469, 479 (7th Cir.2005). … Monell v. Dept. of Soc.

Archie v. City Of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 9, 2023

On March 9, 2021, Eichman, along with Officer Craig Brown (“Brown”) (the affiant officer), stated that he did not have a specific recollection of which lieutenant approved the May 2019 warrant. … Further, in Sides v.

Doe v. Community Unit School District No. 428

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 29, 2021

See Fox v. Vice, 563 U.S. 826, 833 (2011). … Next, they contend that their claims were not frivolous because DeKalb School Board member Jeff Hallgren put them up to filing this lawsuit so that “the School Board would have to act.” Response [144] at 2.