Case law

MJ & Partners Restaurant Ltd. Partnership v. Zadikoff

126 F. Supp. 2d 1130 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 27, 1999

See Cameron General Corp. v. … See Horwitz v. Board of Education of Avoca School Dist. No. 37, 1999 WL 558131 , at *8 (N.D.Ill. Jul.21, 1999); Bogosian v. Board of Education of Community Unit School Dist. 200, 73 F.Supp.2d 949, 953 (N.D.Ill.1999).

Johnson v. Sandidge

87 F. Supp. 2d 832 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 14, 1999

See City of Oklahoma City v. Tuttle, 471 U.S. 808, 823 , 105 S.Ct. 2427 , 85 L.Ed.2d 791 (1985); Sims v. Mulcahy, 902 F.2d 524, 543 (7th Cir.1990). … Rice, 957 F.2d 397, 401 (7th Cir.1992) (finding that policymaking authority for the Chicago Police Department is vested in the Police Board).

Stoltz v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 1, 2020

Amling v. Harrow Indus. LLC, 943 F.3d 373, 376 (7th Cir. 2019). claim with the National Railroad Adjustment Board (“NRAB”). (Id. ¶ 6.) … “Congress did not provide for a Special Board where . . . the dispute is between an individual employee and a carrier.” Chi. R. I. & P. R. Co. v.

Fairley v. Andrews

423 F. Supp. 2d 800 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 16, 2006

See Mosher v. … Brody v.

Tellis v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

625 F. Supp. 92 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 6, 1985

See also Hicks v. Board of Education for School District 189, 177 Ill.App.3d 974 , 33 Ill.Dec. 683 , 397 N.E.2d 16 (5th Dist.1979) (exclusive remedy for malicious delay is complaint to IIC pursuant to § 138.19(k)). … See Griffin v. United States, 703 F.2d 321 (8th Cir.1983).

Thiele Kaolin Company v. Wisconsin Central Ltd.

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 29, 2024

RK Co. v. See, 622 F.3d 846, 850 (7th Cir. 2010). … See Bonte v. U.S.

Abudayyeh v. American Airlines Group Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 30, 2020

Id. at 457; see also Brown v. Ill. Cent. R.R. … See Kurtzhals v.

Conley v. Werlich

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 23, 2020

See United States v. Brown, 299 F.Supp.3d 976, 986 (N.D. Ill. 2018) (Castillo, J.) … Brown, 299 F.Supp.3d at 983–84. Judge Castillo wrote the Brown opinion in the context of motions to dismiss indictments in twelve separate cases.

Sato & Co. v. S & M Produce, Inc.

859 F. Supp. 2d 923 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 19, 2012

After turning over day-to-day operations in 1998, Don did not attend any meetings of the board of directors or stockholders. Don did not hire, fire, or supervise employees and did not sign any corporate minutes. … (quoting Frio Ice v. SunFruit, Inc., 724 F.Supp. 1373, 1382 (S.D.Fla.1989)); Hiller Cranberry Products v.

Slep-Tone Entertainment Corp. v. Sellis Enterprises, Inc.

87 F. Supp. 3d 897 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 3, 2015

The footage came from various branches of the United States Armed Forces, the British Ministry of Information and War Office, the National Film Board of Canada, and unidentified “Newsreel Pool Cameramen.” … Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Exp. Co., 556 F.2d 406 , 427 (9th Cir.1977); see also Slep-Tone Entm’t Corp. v. Coyne, 41 F.Supp.3d 707, 713-14 (N.D.Ill.2014); Slep-Tone Entm’t Corp. v.

Barwin v. Village Of Oak Park

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 13, 2020

In early 2012, after being informed that the Board of Trustees of Oak Park (“Board”) planned to terminate him if he did not resign, Bar- win accepted the Board’s offer to resign and was given a severance package. … Every year from 2007 through 2011, the Board followed an annual evaluation process whereby: (1) Barwin first prepared a self-evaluation which was presented to the full Board; (2) each Board member then prepared an evaluation

Zbaraz v. Hartigan

776 F. Supp. 375 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 3, 1991

In Pasadena City Board of Education v. … Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1 , 91 S.Ct. 1267 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971).

Piacentile v. Snap Diagnostics LLC

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 5, 2018

Sys. v. Mayer Brown, LLP, 861 F.3d 644, 649 (7th Cir. 2017) (citing Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)). … Second, Defendants cite United States v. Sanford-Brown, Ltd., which the Court finds persuasive. 840 F.3d 445, 447 (7th Cir. 2016).

Selep v. City of Chicago

842 F. Supp. 1068 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 24, 1993

See Davis v. … See Brown v. State’s Atty., 783 F.Supp. 1149, 1153 (N.D.Ill.1992).

Jarman v. City of Northlake

950 F. Supp. 1375 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 16, 1997

See Harris v. … See Smart v.

Cady v. South Suburban College

310 F. Supp. 2d 997 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 26, 2004

Cady, a former student of defendant South Suburban College (“SSC”), filed a 155-page, 49-count complaint naming as defendants a number of his fellow students, the college’s lawyer, its president and other officials, its board … Dist. v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1, 35 , 93 S.Ct. 1278 , 36 L.Ed.2d 16 (1973).

Rand McNally & Co. v. Fleet Management Systems, Inc.

591 F. Supp. 726 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 31, 1983

Gracen v. Bradford Exchange, 698 F.2d 300, 305 (7th Cir.1983). See U.S. v. … Dow Jones v. Chicago Board of Trade, 546 F.Supp. 113, 115 (S.D.N.Y.1982). The court is aware of two Seventh Circuit opinions that might be seen as accepting this justification for copyright protection.

Zepperi-Lomanto v. American Postal Workers Union-AFL-CIO

838 F. Supp. 2d 728 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 19, 2012

Keri v. Board of Trustees of Purdue University, 458 F.3d 620, 628 (7th Cir.2006). Rather, the non-movant must show there is a genuinely disputed fact by “citing to particular parts of materials in the record.” … See Rice v.

Goldman v. FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS & L. ASS'N OF WILMETTE

377 F. Supp. 883 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 1, 1974

In Gibson v. … V.

Incredible Technologies, Inc. v. Virtual Technologies, Inc.

284 F. Supp. 2d 1069 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 23, 2003

Co. v. Artic Int’l, Inc., 704 F.2d 1009, 1012 (7th Cir.1983) (video games, defined as distinctive sets of images and sounds stored in circuit boards, are copyrightable as audiovisual works under the 1976 Copyright Act). … See Mitel, Inc. v.