Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersilnd

10,000+ results

2.79s

  • Krakow Business Park v. Locke Lord Lord, LLP

    135 F. Supp. 3d 770 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 28, 2015

    Olson v. Champaign Cnty., Ill., 784 F.3d 1093, 1098-99 (7th Cir.2015) (citing Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 93 , 127 S.Ct. 2197 , 167 L.Ed.2d 1081 (2007); Bell Atlantic Corp. v. … Taylor v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Dart

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 4, 2021

    See Brown v. Budz, 398 F.3d 904, 909 (7th Cir. 2005) (quoting Farmer, 511 U.S. at 834) (addressing a claim by a pretrial detainee under the Fourteenth Amendment); see also Pinkston v. … See Brown, 398 F.3d at 911; see also Shaffer v. Randall, 2017 WL 1739913, at *3 (N.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States Ex Rel. Rainwater v. Morris

    411 F. Supp. 1252 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 4, 1976

    LaVallee, 389 U.S. 40 , *1255 42-43, 88 S.Ct. 194, 196 , 19 L.Ed.2d 41, 43-4 (1967); Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 447-450 , 73 S.Ct. 397, 402-03 , 97 L.Ed. 469, 483-85 (1963). … Kane [v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • In Re 168 Adams Building Corporation

    27 F. Supp. 247 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 14, 1939

    The Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, in Re Hotel Charles Co. v. … There are practical reasons which were pointed out in a case quite different in fact (Giles v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Illinois Department Of Corrections

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 8, 2020

    Brown v. Milwaukee Bd. of Sch. Dirs., 855 F.3d 818, 821 (7th Cir. 2017). … Brown stated only that Jones was unable to work for a medical reason.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Toth v. Rich Township High School District 227

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 12, 2018

    Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 549, 555 (2007). … See Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 (1982). This is so, according to defendants, because the Board’s decision not to renew plaintiff’s contract was in accordance with the Illinois School Code.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Oka v. United Airlines, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 23, 2025

    Rios-O'Donnell v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 837 F. Supp. 2d 868, 875 (N.D. Ill. 2011) (Kennelly, J.). See also, e.g., Brooks v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, Int'l, 630 F. … Supp. 2d 52, 56 (D.D.C. 2009) (claim over refusal to withdraw a grievance was unripe because system board had not yet ruled); Flury v. Marriott Int'l Inc., No. CV-19-04642, 2020 WL 2467271, at *3 (D. Ariz.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • La Casa del Pueblo, Inc. v. Local 703, International Brotherhood of Teamsters

    706 F. Supp. 33 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 16, 1989

    Rather than taking its case to court, as a union pension fund successfully did in Gariup v. … In January, La Casa apparently sought relief from the picketing with the National Labor Relations Board, but its complaint was dismissed on the grounds that the picketing “has not exceeded thirty days” and, in any case, does

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Byers v. Rockford Mass Transit District

    635 F. Supp. 1387 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 28, 1986

    In Consolidated Rail Corp. v. … Patzer v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, 763 F.2d 851 , 854 n. 2 (7th Cir.1985) (citations omitted).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Bervid v. Alvarez

    647 F. Supp. 2d 1006 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 20, 2009

    Kastel v. Winnetka Board of Education, Dist. 36, 975 F.Supp. 1072, 1084 (N.D.Ill.1997) (decision not to re-hire retirees to conserve school district resources rationally related to legitimate interest). … Neither of the cases plaintiff cites, Dyer v. Radcliffe, 169 F.Supp.2d 770 (S.D.Ohio 2001), and Buck v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lindsey v. Orlando

    232 F. Supp. 3d 1027 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 2, 2017

    When boarding finally began, Randy had another exchange with Steinfels and Pirvu. (Compl. ¶ 14.) … Though the family was permitted to board the plane, Steinfels and Pirvu entered the airplane before the flight took off to demand that Randy exit. (Compl. ¶ 15).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • United States Gypsum Co. v. Lafarge North America Inc.

    670 F. Supp. 2d 768 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 27, 2009

    He has been on the Board of Directors of the International Information Systems Forensics Association. (Id.) … See, e.g., Estate of Wicker v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Muzzey v. Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp.

    921 F. Supp. 508 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 26, 1996

    Bradley v. Brown, 852 F.Supp. 690, 697 (N.D.Ind.), aff'd, 42 F.3d 434 (7th Cir.1994). To determine whether Kerr-McGee has met its burden, I apply Fed.R.Evid. 702 as construed by the Supreme Court in Daubert v. … See also Schmaltz v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kaminsky v. Condell Memorial Hospital

    816 F. Supp. 484 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 18, 1993

    Board of Education, No. 87 C 2582, 1988 WL 142247 , 1988 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 14942 (N.D.Ill. … Robins v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Great American Insurance Company, as assignee of the Illinois Community College Risk Management Consortium v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 31, 2023

    board member. … Am. v. Westfield Ins.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gerba v. National Hellenic Museum

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 16, 2018

    Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp., 496 U.S. 384,405 (1990); Salgado by Salgado v. … Email 41 – This is a communication from the board member/attorney to an attorney at the board member/attorney’s firm and the Museum president.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Iddrissu v. McAleenan

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 21, 2021

    Plaintiffs appealed the denial of the petition to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”), but the Board dismissed the appeal on May 3, 2019. … Rosenblum v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hutchens v. Devasiachen

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 4, 2025

    Hutchens’s website discussed Hutchens v. Chicago Board of Education et al., 1:09-cv-07931(N.D. … Chicago Board of Education, the Foundation retaliated against her by not extending her employment contract because of the business relationship between the Foundation, SHIELD, and the Chicago Board of Education. [26]

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bonsol v. Perryman

    240 F. Supp. 2d 823 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 3, 2003

    He presently awaits a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). While awaiting the results of his BIA appeal, Bonsol filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 . … See Calcano-Martinez v. INS, 533 U.S. 348, 351 , 121 S.Ct. 2268 , 150 L.Ed.2d 392 (2001); Forbes v. Perryman, 222 F.Supp.2d 1076, 1077 (N.D.Ill.2002).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • DiGiore v. Ryan

    987 F. Supp. 1045 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 3, 1997

    See Childers v. … Along the same lines, the court in Ahern v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.