Case law

Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, General Committee of Adjustment, Western Lines v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 9, 2018

To prove that the decision exceeded the Board’s jurisdiction, a party must show that the decision was “without foundation in reason or fact” or “wholly baseless and without reason.” Bates v. … Train Dispatchers Ass’n v. Norfolk & W. Ry., 937 F.2d 365, 366 (7th Cir. 1991) (quoting Gunther v. San Diego & Ariz. E. Ry., 382 U.S. 257, 263 (1965)).

Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad v. Soo Line Railroad

365 F. Supp. 867 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 25, 1973

Co. v. Braun et al. (1902), 199 Ill. 390 , 65 N.E. 249 ; Baker et al. v. S. A. Healy Co. et al. (1939), 302 Ill.App. 634 , 24 N.E.2d 228 ; Opal et al. v. … Paxson Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Cumberland County, 201 F. 656 (3rd Cir. 1912) with Johnson v. Board of County Commissioners, 138 Col. 392 , 336 P.2d 300 (1959).

OSF Healthcare System v. SEIU Healthcare IL Personal Assistants Health Plan

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 27, 2021

P. 17(a); Illinois v. Life of Mid-America Ins. Co., 805 F.2d 763, 764 (7th Cir. 1986). … Surgit v. City of Chicago, No. 19-cv-07630, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60046, *2-3 (N.D. Ill.

In Re Folding Carton Antitrust Litigation

557 F. Supp. 1091 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 17, 1983

Van Gemert v. … Boeing Co. v.

Bodo v. Cioppa

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 18, 2023

The Board need not address every piece of evidence by name or “write an exegesis on every contention.” Mansour v. INS, 230 F.3d 902, 908 (7th Cir. 2000) (quoting Becerra-Jimenez v. … V.

Bowers v. Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

57 F. Supp. 2d 594 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 22, 1999

Brenner v. Brown, 36 F.3d 18, 19 (7th Cir.1994). The defendants first argue that Ms. Bowers has not alleged that she was engaged in protected activity. … Maksimovic v.

McNamara v. City of Chicago

700 F. Supp. 917 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 29, 1988

Doe v. St. Joseph’s Hosp., 788 F.2d 411 (7th Cir.1986). … Board of Education of Pekin Elementary School, 602 F.2d 774 (7th Cir.1979), plaintiff did not identify speech which allegedly motivated the retaliatory action, nor did he allege that the speech was of public concern.

Julka v. Butler Illinois School District 53

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 13, 2020

See Adams v. Sussman & Hertzberg, Ltd., 292 Ill. App. 3d 30, 39, 684 N.E.2d 935, 942 (1997); Knysak v. Shelter Life Ins. Co., 273 Ill. App. 3d 360, 371, 652 N.E.2d 832, 840 (1995); Khan v. Am. Airlines, 266 Ill. … See Honaker, 256 F.3d at 496; see also Fox v.

Triumph Packaging Group v. Ward

834 F. Supp. 2d 796 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 2, 2011

Caines credibly testified that food packaging is done on recycled paper board, while AGI's packaging is done on 'Virgin” board. … He explained that it is difficult to switch back and forth between the two because the recycled board leaves bits of lint that affect the quality of printing on virgin board. . Mr.

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Hayes

789 F. Supp. 1430 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 25, 1992

See Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Lloyd L. Sztanyo Trust, 693 F.Supp. 531, 540 , See also Board of Trustees of Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund v. H.F. … The Fund further offers the minutes of the annual meeting of the board of directors of New Midland, which are signed by both Mrs. and Mr. Hayes.

Love Church v. City of Evanston

671 F. Supp. 515 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 3, 1987

Ev-anston’s Zoning Board then publishes notices concerning the proposed use and holds a hearing “within a reasonable time,” approving or denying the use. Id. at KK 12, 13; see also Ordinance § 6-12-4(B). … Hamm v. Virginia Board of Elections, 230 F.Supp. 156 , aff'd 379 U.S. 19 , 85 S.Ct. 157 , 13 L.Ed.2d 91 (1964) (law requiring separate lists of blacks and whites in voting, property, and tax records invalid).

Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC v. JP Motors, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 16, 2024

See Eli Lilly & Co. v. … Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 434 (2009) (quoting Hilton v. Braunskill, 481 U.S. 770, 776–77 (1987)). This standard calls for an “equitable balancing,” Venckiene v.

520 South Michigan Avenue Associates Ltd. v. Unite Here Local 1

939 F. Supp. 2d 863 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 8, 2013

In NLRB v. … Metropolitan Opera Ass’n v.

Harper v. City of Chicago Heights

824 F. Supp. 786 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 17, 1993

Williams v. State Board of Elections, 718 F.Supp. 1324, 1328, n. 8 (N.D.Ill.1989). … Rybicki v. State Board of Elections, 574 F.Supp. 1082 (N.D.Ill.1982); and Ketchum v. Byrne, 740 F.2d 1398 (7th Cir.1984). 83 . Gomez v. Watsonville, 863 F.2d 1407 (9th Cir. 1988). 84 . Report of Dr.

Woods v. Joiner

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 29, 2022

See Lauderdale-El v. Indiana Parole Board, 35 F.4th 572, 575 (7th Cir. 2022) (“a case that could shorten a former prisoner’s term of parole is not moot”); Pope v. … See United States v. Anthony Lee Woods, No. 17 CR 10039 (W.D. Tenn.). As a result of the federal indictment, on June 15, 2017, the Board of Parole notified Mr.

Dokos v. Miller

517 F. Supp. 1039 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 17, 1981

Since the decision in Drogolewicz v. … However the Board ruled that “monies from the sale had not been ... accounted for” and “no evidence had been submitted that appellant received adequate consideration for the sale of the property.” 3 . Beltran v.

Reynaud v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 5, 2021

In the instant case, defendant concedes that there was a finger-thick brown cord on the floor, but plaintiff has offered no evidence as to how it got there or how long it was on the floor. Citing Olinger v. … It did sell brown twine, but it was thinner than even the thin white twine that bound the papers.

Tomblin v. Chicago State University

795 F. Supp. 270 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 30, 1992

In this instance Cannon v. … But that notion has most recently been scotched in Will v.

Tcherepnin v. Franz

393 F. Supp. 1197 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 14, 1975

Stat.1963, ch. 32, § 779(a), provided: (a) Each association shall have a contingent reserve to which the board of directors shall allocate such portion of the association’s profits as the board may determine; except that … Oran Mensik, president, board chairman and chairman of the Executive Committee of City Savings. Mensik, p. 3.

Halpern

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 18, 2025

KL3, LLC v. United States, 176 Fed.Cl. 657, 668 (2025); Kan. Nat. Res. Coal. v. United States Dep’t. of Interior, 971 F.3d 1222, 1231 (10th Cir. 2020); Kareem v. Haspel, 986 F.3d 859, 865-66 (D.C. … Powell and the Board of Governors possess an absolute right to remove under 28 U.S.C. § 1442. Thus, remand would be circular and futile. IV.