Case law

Bodenstab v. County of Cook

539 F. Supp. 2d 1009 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 28, 2008

See Cassimy v. Board of Educ. of Rockford Public Sch., Dist. No. 205, 461 F.3d 932, 935-36 (7th Cir.2006). … See, e.g., Starkey v. Civil Serv. Comm’n, 97 Ill.2d 91 , 73 Ill.Dec. 405 , 454 N.E.2d 265 (1983); Finnerty v. Personnel Board of the City of Chicago, 303 Ill.App.3d 1 , 236 Ill.Dec. 473 , 707 N.E.2d 600 (1999).

Howard v. Proviso Township H.S. District 209

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 21, 2022

Passenger Corp. v. Morgan, 536 U.S. 101, 113 (2002); Beamon v. Marshall & Ilsley Trust Co., 411 F.3d 854, 860-61 (7th Cir. 2005); Hedrich v. Board of Regents of Univ. of Wisc. … In support, Defendants point to the Illinois School Code, which states that the right to sue or be sued belongs solely to the board of education. Board of Education of Bremen High School Dist. No. 228 v.

Bennett v. Central Telephone Co. of Illinois

545 F. Supp. 893 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 2, 1982

Union has posted job vacancies for plant side positions on bulletin boards in areas where few women work (Complaint UD). 2. … Parson v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp., 575 F.2d 1374, 1389 (5th Cir. 1978); Johnson v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 491 F.2d 1364, 1381-82 (5th Cir. 1974); Peters v. Missouri-Pacific Ry.

Bankston v. Heckler

620 F. Supp. 706 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 5, 1985

Debolt v. Califano, 445 F.Supp. 893, 896 (S.D.Ill.1978). It is not this Court’s function to appraise the evidence de novo. … Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 , 91 S.Ct. 1420 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971).

Coleman v. Sheriff

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 7, 2018

The Seventh Circuit has indicated that a Title VII claim against the Merit Board would be “frivolous” because the Merit Board does not act as an employer. Averhart v. … at 1257; accord McFatridge v.

County of Cook v. Kellogg Company

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 19, 2019

Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw, LLP, 719 F.3d 785, 794 (7th Cir. 2013). The Court must not make credibility determinations or weigh conflicting evidence. McCann v. Iroquois Mem’l Hosp., 622 F.3d 745, 752 (7th Cir. 2010). … The Board’s approval of the agreement deserves “at least great respect.” See id.

United States v. Turner

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 8, 2021

The parties disagree about the applicability of White v. United States and Turner v. Brown in Turner's case. The Court begins with an overview of both decisions. 1. White v. … Turner v. Brown The Seventh Circuit examined Magwood again in Turner v. Brown, 845 F.3d 294 (7th Cir. 2017), and further refined controlling precedent.

Green Street Association v. Daley

250 F. Supp. 139 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 10, 1966

There, also, the complaint was made of the inadequacies of the hearing before the City Council, or the Land Clearance Commission, the State Housing Board, and the HHFA. … The Court of Appeals cited the Shapiro v.

Dixon v. Grand Spaulding Dodge, Inc. (In Re Grand Spaulding Dodge, Inc.)

5 B.R. 481 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 9, 1980

In Matter of Penn Central Transportation Company, 347 F.Supp. 1356, 1366 (E.D.Pa.1972); Burke v. Morphy, 109 F.2d 572 (2d Cir. 1940). See Gillis v. California, 293 U.S. 62 , 55 S.Ct. 4 , 79 L.Ed. 199 (1934). … The court in Dolly Madison Industries, supra, distinguished Stout v.

Krukar v. Alexander

386 F. Supp. 1112 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 25, 1974

The leading cases on the right to pre-termination and termination hearings are Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972), and its companion, Perry v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, supra. And it stretches the concept of liberty too far to suggest that a person is deprived of liberty when he simply is not rehired in one job but remains as free as before to seek another.

Jerome Milton, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

734 F. Supp. 1416 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 12, 1990

National Mediation Board, 670 F.2d 665, 668-69 (7th Cir.1981) (assertion of jurisdiction by National Mediation Board was not final agency action where it was not definitive and did not have direct and immediate effect upon … See also Board of Trade v. S.E.C., 883 F.2d 525 , 529 (7th Cir.1989) (letter expressing intent not to prosecute at the time, so long as certain conditions are satisfied, is too tentative to be final agency action).

Phillips v. Atchison

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 26, 2023

Blackmon v. … See Hayes v.

Gomez v. Palmer

181 F. Supp. 3d 498 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 3, 2015

Edward Glaser, M.D., (“Dr.Glaser”) a board certified physician in investigational pain management. In Dr. … See Hayes v.

Gerut v. Poe

11 F.R.D. 281 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 7, 1951

Lewis v. West Side Trust & Sav. Bank, 1941, 377 Ill. 384 , 36 N.E.2d 573 . … Judge Nordbye in Madden v.

Berens v. Ludwig

953 F. Supp. 249 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 13, 1997

Cromley v. Board of Educ. of Lockport, 699 F.Supp. 1283, 1285 (N.D.Ill. 1988). … P. 12(b)(6); Gomez v. Illinois State Board of Educ., 811 F.2d 1030, 1039 (7th Cir.1987).

Black & Decker Inc. v. Positec USA Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 20, 2020

Patent Trial and Appeals Board’s resolution of inter partes review proceeding concerning the 417 patent. Black & Decker, Inc. v. Positec USA, Inc., 646 F. App’x 1019 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (unpublished). … Brown v. 3M, 265 F.3d 1349, 1351 (Fed. Cir. 2001). With these principles in mind, the court compares the accused products with the 417 patent as construed above.

Engis Corp. v. Engis Ltd.

800 F. Supp. 627 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 28, 1992

See also, Hill v. Norfolk & W.R. … Smith v. Smith, 28 Ill. 56 (1862) and Brown v. Atwood, 224 Ill.App. 77 (2d Dist.1922). 6 . Dreis & Krump Mfg, 802 F.2d at 250 .

In Re Joliet-Will County Community Action Agency

78 B.R. 184 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 17, 1987

See, e.g., United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc., 462 U.S. 198 , 103 S.Ct. 2309 , 76 L.Ed.2d 515 (1983). … According to Palmiter v.

Associates in Adolescent Psychiatry v. Home Life Insurance

729 F. Supp. 1162 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 19, 1989

See Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. v. Connecticut General Life, Ins. Co., 713 F.2d 254 , 259 (7th Cir.1983); Brandt v. Grounds, 687 F.2d 895, 896-98 (7th Cir. 1982). … Plaintiffs further contend that the FA cannot be a guaranteed benefit policy under the Seventh Circuit’s decisions in Peoria Union and Chicago Board, supra. They also rely heavily on Jacobson v.

Hernandez v. Woodard

714 F. Supp. 963 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 13, 1989

The Illinois Board of Elections has promulgated guidelines to clarify certain confusions arising from 114-6.2(a)(5). … In Palmer v.