Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.28s
81 F. Supp. 2d 893 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 14, 2000
Crim v. Board of Educ. of Cairo Sch. Dist. No. 1, 147 F.3d 535, 540 (7th Cir.1998). … Board of Educ., 979 F.2d 560, 565 (7th Cir.1992) (same).
Cited 6 timesPublishedNaperville Smart Meter Awareness v. City of Naperville
69 F. Supp. 3d 830 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 25, 2014
See Hunt v. … Glick v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedLake Caryonah Improvement Ass'n v. Pulte Home Corp.
706 F. Supp. 600 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 2, 1989
Zoning Board of Appeals, 81 Ill.App.3d 105 , 400 N.E.2d 433 , 36 Ill.Dec. 13 (1st Dist.1980). … See Board of Education v. Village of Hoffman Estates, 126 Ill.App.3d 625 , 467 N.E.2d 1064 , 81 Ill.Dec. 942 (1st Dist.1984).
Cited 1 timesPublishedRoper Corp. v. Litton Systems Inc.
589 F. Supp. 823 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 10, 1984
O’Connor v. Board of Education, 645 F.2d 578 , 580 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1084 , 102 S.Ct. 641 , 70 L.Ed.2d 619 (1981). … See Signode Corp. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedUnited States ex rel. Chatman v. Lane
573 F. Supp. 693 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 4, 1983
United States v. Rogers, 475 F.2d 821, 827 (7th Cir.1973), (quoting Fountain v. United States, 384 F.2d 624, 628 (5th Cir.1967)). … United States v. Brown, 634 F.2d 819, 825 (5th Cir.1981). Based upon a review of the trial court record in this case, the Court finds that defense counsel was able to probe effectively Sherry’s identification testimony.
Cited 1 timesPublishedWilliams-Green v. J. Alexander's Restaurants, Inc.
277 F.R.D. 374 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 1, 2011
See Brown v. Yellow Transportation, Inc., No. 08 CV 5908, 2011 WL 1838741 , at *2 (N.D.Ill. May 11, 2011). In making its determination, the court may look beyond the pleadings. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. … In support, it cites Driver v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedIn Re Aimster Copyright Litigation
252 F. Supp. 2d 634 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 4, 2002
Chat Rooms and Bulletin Boards Aimster’s service includes message (or bulletin) boards on which Aimster users would regularly post messages to each other. … . ¶ 3, Ex. 1 (containing screen shots of bulletin board messages).
Cited 27 timesPublishedCBS Outdoor, Inc. v. Village of Plainfield
959 F. Supp. 2d 1054 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 30, 2013
Hollander v. Brown, 457 F.3d 688 , 691 n. 1 (7th Cir.2006). … See Nolan v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedRenken v. The Illinois State Toll Highway Authority
District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 19, 2023
The Tollway argues this document shows that Pasulka-Brown knew of Renken’s Illinois Department of Labor complaint approximately four months before Renken alleges Pasulka-Brown learned Renken’s identity and the Tollway … See Longstreet v. Illinois Dep’t of Corrections, 276 F.3d 379, 384 (7th Cir. 2002); Tomanovich v. City of Indianapolis, 457 F.3d 656, 665 (7th Cir. 2006); Sauzek v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown901 F. Supp. 271 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 17, 1995
See Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972) (“Property interests, of course, are not created by the Constitution. … See Carnegie-Mellon Univ. v.
Cited 2 timesPublished447 F. Supp. 2d 895 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 17, 2006
In Murphy Bros., Inc. v. … See Goldey v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedWilliams v. Chicago Public Schools
District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 21, 2021
Among those considered "local public entities" are school districts and school boards. 745 ILCS 10/1-206; Albert v. … Accordingly, due to the Board's status as a governmental entity, the IRFRA claim against the Board is subject to a one-year statute of limitations. Cf. Williams v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWhite v. Park Forest-Chicago Heights School District 163
District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 28, 2023
See Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576‒77 (1972). … See Baird v. Board of Educ. for Warren Comm. Unit School Dist. No. 205, 389 F.3d 685, 692‒93 (7th Cir. 2004).
Cited 0 timesUnknownAllen v. Chicago Transit Authority
163 F. Supp. 2d 953 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 6, 2001
Prior to Brown’s retirement — as an experiment handled by both Brown and Fu-dala — Allen, Burnette and Lebrón filled in as managers. Id. at 70-72. Allen and Burnette handled their assignments well. Id. … [Brown] is still there to help them.” Id. at 71. Brown retired late in 1994. Among those interviewed for the position were Allen, Burnette and Lebrón.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 25, 2022
Villano v. … Browning v. Colvin, 766 F.3d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 2014).
Cited 0 timesUnknown372 F. Supp. 654 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 21, 1974
C. v. W. J. … See also, Stuckey v. duPont Glore Forgan, Inc., 59 F.R.D. 129, 131 (N.D.Cal.1973); Wasnowic v. Chicago Board of Trade, 352 F.Supp. 1066 (M.D.Pa.1972).
Cited 6 timesPublishedAmerican Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Tristano
698 F. Supp. 149 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 27, 1988
Nurses Ass’n v. State Labor Rel. Bd., 156 Ill.App.3d 841, 843-44 , 109 Ill.Dec. 295, 296 , 509 N.E.2d 1307, 1308 (1987). … They direct this court’s attention to AFSCME v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMcKinney v. Chicago Transit Authority
District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 20, 2023
Contrary to the situation with Brown, CTA timely disclosed Romano during discovery. … See Est. of Brown v. Thomas, 771 F.3d 1001, 1006 (7th Cir. 2014) (“Deposing a witness is optional.”). Indeed, Plaintiff's counsel deposed witnesses with similar disclosures to those that CTA provided for Romano.
Cited 0 timesUnknown631 F. Supp. 763 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 25, 1986
Board of Supervisors of Franklin County, Virginia, 742 F.2d 142, 146 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1358 , 84 L.Ed.2d 380 (1985). 3 . … As with Rule 11 (Frazier v.
Cited 4 timesPublished308 F. Supp. 133 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 18, 1969
The Board of Patent Interferences rejected defendant’s contention, stating that: “In their brief, Robbins, et al. … Compare Shumaker v. Gem Mfg. Co., 311 F.2d 273, 275 (7th Cir. 1962), with Anderson Co. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 265 F.2d 755, 761 (7th Cir. 1959), and Charles Peckat Mfg. Co. v.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna