Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersilnd

10,000+ results

1.26s

  • Boyd v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

    787 F. Supp. 2d 747 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 12, 2011

    Securing the Property includes, but is not limited to, entering the Property to make repairs, change locks, replace or board up doors and windows, drain water from pipes, eliminate building or other code violations or dangerous … Bank when it entered Hodges’ residence and changed the locks”); Browning v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Rawson & Evans Co. v. Atlas Glass & Mirror Co.

    42 F.2d 241 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 1, 1930

    No. 11194, 1 Biss. 87 ), and as claims should always be construed in the light of the description (Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co., 93 U. S. 493 , 23 L. Ed. 952 ; Howe Machine Co. v. National Needle Co., 134 U. … Matthews v. Shoneberger (C. C.) 4 F. 635 ; Olds v. Brown (C. C.) 41 F. 698 ; *243 Jewell Filter Co. v. Jackson (C. C. A.) 140 F. 340 ; National Tube Co. v. Mark (C. C. A.) 216 F. 507 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • International Golden Foods, Inc. v. Saffronia, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 9, 2025

    Platt v. Brown, 872 F.3d 848, 851 (7th Cir. 2017). … In Autotech, the plaintiff, an Illinois corporation that manufactured and distributed circuit boards, entered into a distributorship agreement with the defendant for the sale of its products to defendant

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. White

    549 F. Supp. 777 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 14, 1982

    Owens v. … Maguire, supra at 315; see Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Fry v. UAL Corp.

    136 F.R.D. 626 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 1, 1991

    That same day, the board retained The First Boston Corporation to devise a plan for the sale of the non-core businesses. … Moreover, in Miner v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Bittman v. Fox

    107 F. Supp. 3d 896 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 1, 2015

    See Matot v. … Bryson v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Altobella v. Bowen

    668 F. Supp. 1134 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 6, 1987

    Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 , 91 S.Ct. 1420, 1427 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971), quoting Consolidated Edison Co. v. … It is based, moreover, on the Workers’ Compensation Board’s calculation, as the $32,000.00 gross settlement figure (before deduction of attorneys fees and medical expenses), as expressed by the Workers’ Compensation Board

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Stubenfield v. Chicago Housing Authority

    6 F. Supp. 3d 779 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 26, 2013

    Plaintiffs refer to Sager v. Hous. … They allege that former CHA Board Chairman, in 2011 discussed a proposed plan to expand drug testing in mixed-income communities to all public housing residents. (Dkt. 14, First Am. Compl. at ¶¶ 39-^40).

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Houston v. Village Of Calumet Park

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 26, 2019

    Indeed, Manuel v. … Leaver v. Shortess, 844 F.3d 665, 669 (7th Cir. 2016) (quoting Whitlock v. Brown, 596 F.3d 406, 411 (7th Cir. 2010)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Oakland County Employees' Retirement System v. Massaro

    702 F. Supp. 2d 1012 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 7, 2010

    (“Huron”) against members of Huron’s Board of Directors and a number of its current and former executive officers. 1 Plaintiffs allege that the defendants overstated Huron’s revenue for a period of several years, causing … Board of Educ. of Valley View Community Unit Sch. Dist. No. 365U v. Bosworth, 713 F.2d 1316, 1321 (7th Cir.1983) (quotation marks omitted).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Nolan v. City of Chicago

    125 F. Supp. 2d 324 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 21, 2000

    Alexander v. … Kohlheim v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Niebur v. Town of Cicero

    136 F. Supp. 2d 915 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 23, 2001

    Haley v. Gross, 86 F.3d 630, 645 (7th Cir.1996). Expert witnesses are not allowed to draw “legal conclusions,” West v. … See Butera v. District of Columbia, 235 F.3d 637, 660 (D.C.Cir.2001) (quoting District of Columbia v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bingham v. CNA Financial Corp.

    408 F. Supp. 2d 563 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 19, 2005

    Jacobs, 356 F.Supp.2d at 892-93 (holding that plaintiff could not present his ERISA estoppel claim to the district court because he did not properly exhaust it before the administrative review board). See also Stark v. … PPM America, Inc., 354 F.3d 666 (7th Cir.2004) (affirming the district court’s dismissal of an ERISA claim not properly presented to the administrative review board); DeBartolo v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Subpoena to Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.

    720 F. Supp. 2d 969 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 2, 2010

    In Leach Co. v. … In Maunder v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Waterloo Furniture Components, Ltd. v. Haworth, Inc.

    798 F. Supp. 489 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 18, 1992

    However, this issue was not definitively addressed by the Board in Klumb . … See e.g., Intellicall, Inc. v. Phonometrics, Inc., 952 F.2d 1384, 1387 , 21 U.S.P.Q.2d 1383, 1386 (Fed.Cir.1992). United States v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Levin v. The Posen Foundation

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 2, 2018

    See United States v. … Brown, 209 F.3d 1020, 1023 (7th Cir. 2000) (“Under this analysis, Brown must demonstrate that ‘he either intended from the outset to commit [the] crimes or that he intended to commit one crime which, by necessity, involved

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hudson v. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 9, 2019

    (internal quotation marks omitted); Brown v. Wyndemere LLC, 608 F. App’x 424, 425 (7th Cir. 2015) (“[A] district court is entitled to enforce its local rules, even against pro se litigants.”). … On the evening of August 15, 2015, Hudson attempted to board a Metra train departing from the LaSalle Street Station. Doc. 92 at ¶ 8.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Williams v. The City of Chicago

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 11, 2023

    Hamdan v. Indiana Univ. … Valero Energy Corp. v. United States, 569 F.3d 626, 630 (7th Cir. 2009). See also Raybestos Prod. Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Proctor v. General Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists

    651 F. Supp. 1505 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 29, 1986

    In Tate v. … Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 351 , 63 S.Ct. 307, 313 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943) (Sherman Act applies to business combinations, not state action, relying on statement by Sen. Sherman); Apex Hosiery Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Littlefield v. Mack

    134 F.R.D. 234 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 21, 1991

    Supreme Court issued Marek v. … Kelley v. Metropolitan County Board of Education, 773 F.2d 677 (6th Cir.1985).

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.