Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersilnd

10,000+ results

0.46s

  • Chisholm v. Foothill Capital Corp.

    3 F. Supp. 2d 925 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 4, 1998

    Landgraf v. USI Film Products, 968 F.2d 427 , 430 (5th Cir.1992), aff'd, 511 U.S. 244 , 114 S.Ct. 1483 , 128 L.Ed.2d 229 (1994); Brown v. Ameritech, No. 95 C 3914, 1997 WL 43224 , at *11 (N.D.Ill. … See Rabinovitz v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • National People's Action v. City of Blue Island

    594 F. Supp. 72 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 11, 1984

    Johnson v. Board of Education of Chicago, 664 F.2d 1069, 1071 (7th Cir.1981), rev’d on other grounds, 457 U.S. 52 , 102 S.Ct. 2223 , 72 L.Ed.2d 668 (1982). … In Screws v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Suburban Teamsters of Northern Illinois Welfare & Pension Funds v. Moser

    867 F. Supp. 665 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 19, 1994

    Central States Pension Fund v. … The Funds’ interest is obviously protected as section 9.1(B) delegates authority to the Board of Trustees to resolve disputes over employer contributions.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hughes v. Conticarriers & Terminals, Inc.

    753 F. Supp. 221 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 21, 1990

    The majority in Mitchell v. … Bruszewski v. Isthmian S.S. Co., 163 F.2d 720 (CA 3rd 1947); McCoy v. U.S., 689 F.2d 1196 (CA 4th 1982). The Eleventh Circuit in 1985, in Deakle v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Adams v. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court

    600 F. Supp. 390 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 4, 1984

    See Ryan v. State Board of Elections of the State of Illinois, 661 F.2d at 1135 . Abstaining in this case would fit none of the recognized types of abstention. A. … See Babbitt v. Farm Workers, 442 U.S. 289, 306 , 99 S.Ct. 2301, 2312-13 , 60 L.Ed.2d 895 (1979); Ryan v. State Board of Elections, 661 F.2d at 1136 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Safrithis v. Shulkin

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 25, 2018

    Albrecht’s justification for requesting to convene the Summary Review Board was pretextual. See, e.g., Loudermilk v. … Little v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gluck ex rel. Gluck v. Bowen

    676 F. Supp. 165 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 18, 1987

    Hoitt v. Vitek, 495 F.2d 219 (1st Cir.1974). … Brown v. Secretary of Health & Human Services, 747 F.2d 878, 885 (3d Cir.1984); McGill v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bailey v. Unocal Corp.

    700 F. Supp. 396 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 29, 1988

    See Mein v. … For example, the Ninth Circuit "has long rejected the doctrine of pendent parties across the board." Moore v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Searight v. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp.

    625 F. Supp. 17 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 19, 1984

    Goodman v. Board of Trustees of Community College, Etc., 511 F.Supp. 602, 605 (N.D.Ill.1981). … See Scofield v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Cleversafe, Inc. v. Amplidata, Inc.

    287 F.R.D. 424 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 29, 2012

    Cf, Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 118 , 115 S.Ct. 552 , 130 L.Ed.2d 462 (1994) (the presumption is that a given term is used to mean the same thing throughout a statute). … K.J. v. Brown, 91 Fed.Appx. 823, 827 (4th Cir.2004) (emphasis supplied). See also Tilyard v. O’Reilly Auto Parts, Inc., 2012 WL 5250534 (M.D.N.C.2012); Collins v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Bennett v. Tucker

    634 F. Supp. 355 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 8, 1986

    The court later held that after 180 days, the FEPC had no authority to issue a complaint in Board of Governors v. The Fair Employment Practices Commission, 78 Ill.2d 143 , 35 Ill.Dec. 524 , 399 N.E.2d 590 (1979). … DISCUSSION In Logan v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Markham v. White

    171 F.R.D. 217 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 28, 1997

    with their wives (FAC H 11(a)); (2) interspersing instructional slides with pictures of nude or scantily clad women (id. 1111(c)); (3) referring to women in general as “bitches” and to African-American women in general as “brown … Typicality Rosario, 963 F.2d at 1018 , quoting De La Fuente v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Matusek Academy of Music, Inc. v. National Surety Corp.

    110 F. Supp. 86 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 13, 1953

    The regular members are the original six incorporators, the National Board of Fire Underwriters and the officials of this board or of any company members as may be elected by a majority of the members. … Midwest Dairy Products Corp. v. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co., 356 Ill. 389 , 190 N.E. 702 . In the case of Kaplan v. U. S.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Stevens v. Brookhart

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 2, 2020

    Stevens and Brown were driving around in celebration of Brown’s birthday. (Id. at 6.) At the time, Brown and Mayers were on bad terms because Mayers was selling drugs in Brown’s territory. Id. … Lopez v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Marquez, Plenary Co-Guardian of Chloe Marquez, a disabled person v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 3, 2022

    Defendant Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois exercises final authority over UI Health (“UI Health”), the hospitals and healthcare system operated by the University of Illinois. … See Silha v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Stroman Realty, Inc. v. Grillo

    438 F. Supp. 2d 929 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 18, 2006

    The Real Estate Administration and Disciplinary Board (“Board”) of the Office of Banks and Real Estate (“OBRE”) then, hears the charges and the accused and complainant may be represented by counsel and present “statements … The Board and OBRE possess subpoena powers over “any persons or documents for the purpose of investigation or hearing ... in the same manner as prescribed by law for judicial procedure in civil cases in the courts of [Illinois

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Doe v. School District U-46

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 27, 2021

    Count XIV asserts a claim against the District U-46 Board of Education under Title IX, 20 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq. In Davis ex rel. LaShonda D. v. … V. In Count XV, Plaintiffs assert a Title IX retaliation claim against the District U-46 School Board.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Sato

    704 F. Supp. 816 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 4, 1989

    See, e.g., Lysiak v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 816 F.2d 311, 312 (7th Cir.1987); United States v. … See Childs v. Duckworth, 705 F.2d 915, 922 (7th Cir.1983). However, pro se litigants are not excused from compliance with substantive and procedural law. Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 804 (8th Cir.1986).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • NM Paterson & Sons, Limited v. City of Chicago

    176 F. Supp. 323 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 4, 1959

    Thus, it is said that there is no immunity if “full relief can be obtained from the named defendants without requiring the State to take any action” (Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agr. and Mechanical … College v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Rajaratnam v. Moyer

    832 F. Supp. 1219 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 17, 1993

    Petitioners ask this court to review the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision denying their applications for asylum and withholding of deportation. … These applications were denied by immigration judges, and the Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed both decisions. The specific facts of each petitioner’s case is set forth below. A.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.