Case law

John O. Butler Company v. Standard Oil Company (Ohio)

365 F. Supp. 501 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 19, 1973

Co. v. … To the same effect, see Kearney & Trecker Corp. v. Cincinnati Milling Machine Co., 254 F.Supp. 130 (N.D.Ill. 1966) (Marovitz, J.).

Vanderlinde v. Brochman

792 F. Supp. 52 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 18, 1992

And most recently our Court of Appeals has spoken in Gibson v. … Accord, Hughes v. Meyer, 880 F.2d 967, 971-72 (7th Cir.1989).

American Federation of State v. Tristano

695 F. Supp. 410 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 27, 1988

Next it filed unfair labor practice charges with the Illinois State Labor Relations Board (“ISLRB”). … It argues that this court should abstain along the lines suggested in Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco, Inc., 481 U.S. 1 , 107 S.Ct. 1519 , 95 L.Ed.2d 1 (1987).

Kozar v. Munoz

230 F. Supp. 3d 915 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 31, 2017

Brown v. Budz, 398 F.3d 904, 911 (7th Cir. 2005). … See Borello, 446 F.3d at 748 -49 (citing Velez v. Johnson, 395 F.3d 732, 736-37 (7th Cir. 2005); Haley, 86 F.3d at 642 ); Brown, 398 F.3d at 914 .

Augustine v. Edgar

576 F. Supp. 1141 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 13, 1983

In Board of Regents v. … See Durso v. Rowe, 579 F.2d 1365 , 1371 n. 6 (7th Cir.1978); Craft v. Board of Trustees, 516 F.Supp. 1317, 1325 (N.D.Ill.1981).

Corporate Travel Consultants, Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc.

799 F. Supp. 58 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 28, 1992

See Burda v. M. Ecker Co., 954 F.2d 434 , 438 n. 5 (7th Cir.1992) (citing Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Taylor, 481 U.S. 58 , 107 S.Ct. 1542 , 95 L.Ed.2d 55 (1987), and Avco Corp. v. … In Federated Dep’t Stores, Inc. v.

Veatch v. Northwestern Memorial Hospital

730 F. Supp. 809 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 4, 1990

v. … Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 494 & n. 11, 74 S.Ct. 686 , 691 & n. 11, 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954).

Chicago Teachers Union, Local 1 American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO v. Board Of Education City Of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 30, 2018

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957)). … Beraha v. Baxter Health Care Corp., 956 F.2d 1436, 1443 (7th Cir. 1992); see also Voyles v. Sania Mortg.

Frazier v. Jeffreys

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 30, 2021

Co. v. … V.

Werthman v. ILLINOIS DMH/DD

831 F. Supp. 625 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 24, 1993

See Rucker v. Higher Educational Aids Board, 669 F.2d 1179, 1184 (7th Cir.1982). … Board of Education of Township High School Dist. 205, Will County, Ill., 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968), and Givhan v.

Ford v. Page

169 F. Supp. 2d 831 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 27, 2001

The Administrative Review Board as the Director’s designee reviews the appeal of the grievance and determines whether a hearing is necessary; (4) The Administrative Review Board forwards its decision and any recommendations … Radmacher of the Administrative Review Board, dated November 15, 1999, determining that his grievance was without merit.

USM Corp. v. SPS Technologies, Inc.

514 F. Supp. 213 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 4, 1981

Lorenz v. … From the Appeals Board Opinion and Mr.

Maddox v. Carlson

587 F. Supp. 399 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 19, 1984

Christopher v. U.S. Board of Parole, 589 F.2d 924, 927 (7th Cir.1978). In Christopher , the Court considered this to be an “inchoate grant of parole.” Id. at 925 . … This case is distinguished from Christopher v. U.S. Board of Parole, 589 F.2d 924 (7th Cir.1978), because here the Commission could only recommend, it could not grant, an “effective date of parole.”

Krampe v. Ideal Industries, Inc.

347 F. Supp. 1384 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 26, 1972

Co. v. Booth, 125 F.2d 660, 664 (6th Cir. 1942). … Gladding & Co. v. Scientific Anglers, Inc., 245 F.2d 722 (6th Cir. 1957); L. L. Brown Paper Co. v. Hydroiloid, 118 F.2d 674 (2d Cir. 1941).

Iroanyah v. Bank of America, N.A.

851 F. Supp. 2d 1115 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 14, 2012

Nov. 18, 2009); Cazares v. Household Fin. Corp., 2005 WL 6418178 , at *9 (C.D.Cal. July 26, 2005); Brown v. Nationscredit Fin. Servs. Corp., 349 F.Supp.2d 1134, 1136-37 (N.D.Ill.2005); Bell v. Ameriquest Mortg. … This is made clear by the Federal Reserve Board’s Official Commentary, which binds the court unless found to be “demonstrably irrational.” Ford Motor Credit Co. v.

Planned Parenthood Ass'n Chicago Area v. Kempiners

568 F. Supp. 1490 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 9, 1983

Kelley v. Metropolitan County Board of Education, 372 F.Supp. 528, 534 (M.D.Tenn. 1973). 9 In short, it cannot be said that there is no reasonable possibility that the challenged conduct will recur. … See also Rabinowitz v. Board of Junior College Dist. No. 508, 507 F.2d 1255 (7th Cir.1975); Nevada ex rel. Nevada Board of Agriculture v. United States, 512 F.Supp. 166, 169 (D.Nev. 1981). 9 .

Williams v. Bowen

664 F. Supp. 1200 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 9, 1987

There she initially worked on an assembly line making circuit boards for various types of electronic devices. Later she was switched to repairing circuit boards that had been rejected by inspectors (R. 34-38). … As explained in Zblewski v.

Sapienza v. Cook County Office of the Public Defender

128 F. Supp. 2d 563 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 23, 2001

In counties with a population over 1 million, which Cook County has, the public defender is appointed by the president of the county board of commissioners with the board’s advice and consent. … See Richter v.

United States v. Interlake, Inc.

432 F. Supp. 985 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 6, 1977

Train v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 421 U.S. 60, 92 , 95 S.Ct. 1470 , 43 L.Ed.2d 731 (1975). … Granite City Steel Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 501 F.2d 925 (7th Cir. 1974).

Lukis v. Whitepages Incorporated

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 16, 2021

See Doe v. … Norvaisas and Brown have the better of this argument. Before class certification, there is no class and no class counsel. See Daniels v.