Case law

United States v. McHie

194 F. 894 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 28, 1912

The leading and satisfactory case of Dillon v. O’Brien, 16 Cox Crim. Cas. 245 (Irish, Exchequer Div.), and U. S. v. Mills (C. C.) 185 Fed. 318 , are therefore inapplicable. … Smyth v. Ames, 169 U. S. 466, 578 , 18 Sup. Ct. 418, 42 L. Ed. 819 . [6] It is urged that the marshal’s return, although utterly false, cannot be traversed in a collateral proceeding, under Brown v.

Soo Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers

74 F. Supp. 3d 902 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 21, 2014

Trackage rights agreements must be approved by the Surface Transportation Board (“STB”). … Co. v. Int’l Bhd. of Elec.

Pittway Corp. v. United States

887 F. Supp. 164 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 5, 1995

In Carney v. … In U.S. v.

Covenant Media of Illinois, L.L.C. v. City of Des Plaines, Illinois

391 F. Supp. 2d 682 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 8, 2005

Review of a final administrative decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals by the courts, however, is distinct from a specified period in which the Zoning Board of Appeals must act to render a decision on a ruling by the Zoning … Board with regard to the grant or denied of a sign permit.

I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. United States Rubber Co.

278 F. 975 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 15, 1922

See, also, Davis v. Brown, 94 U. S. 423 , 24 L. Ed. 204 ; Campbell v. Rankin, 99 U. S. 261 , 25 L. Ed. 435 ; Block v. Commissioners, 99 U. S. 686, 693 , 25 L. Ed. 491 ; Wilson v. Deen, 121 U. S. 525, 532 , 7 Sup. … In the opinion in the case of Tee Pee Rubber Co. v. I. T. S. Rubber Co., 268 Fed. 250, 255 , the Court of Appeals of the Sixth Circuit said: “We quite agree with Judge Brown in his conclusion (I. T. S. Co. v.

Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. E-II Holdings, Inc.

722 F. Supp. 429 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 5, 1989

Broad v. Rockwell Intern. Corp., 642 F.2d 929, 957 (5th Cir.1981). … See also Central Montana Electric Power Corp. v. Administrator, 840 F.2d 1472 , 1474-75 (9th Cir.1988) (giving standing to cooperatives), and Adams v.

Bills Ex Rel. Bills v. Homer Consolidated School District Number 33-C

967 F. Supp. 1063 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 1, 1997

At a school disciplinary hearing on May 7, 1996 the School District’s Board of Education took action to expel plaintiff from school. … The court found, inter alia, that the school board abused its discretion by expelling plaintiff from May 8, 1996 through the end of the 1996-1997 school year.

Burmistrz v. City of Chicago

186 F. Supp. 2d 863 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 22, 2002

Plaintiff believes he took this memorandum off the bulletin board at work, copied it, and re *868 turned it to the bulletin board. (Pl.Res. ¶ 53). … As requested, Plaintiff appeared before the Local 1 Executive Board on December 28, 1998. (Pl.Res.f 101).

In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust Litigation

235 F.R.D. 407 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 10, 2006

From 1994 through 2001, the Chairman of Falconbridge’s Board, Alex Bal-ogh, was also the Deputy Chairman of No-randa’s Board of Directors. … Brown Shoe [Co., 384 U.S. 316 , 86 S.Ct. 1501 , 16 L.Ed.2d 587 (1966)] or United Airlines v. CAB[, 766 F.2d 1107 (7th Cir.1985)] Sally Beauty Co., Inc. v.

Federal Election Commission v. Illinois Medical Political Action Committee (Impac)

503 F. Supp. 45 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 22, 1980

Since normally privileged material submitted in the course of an agency proceeding is protectible under other statutes, see, e. g., Chrysler Corp. v. … Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 294-319 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1714-1726 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979), or, presumably, traditional common law doctrines, IMPAC’s position would provide an extension of protection for precisely that information which

Leto v. RCA Corp.

355 F. Supp. 2d 921 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 25, 2004

See e.g., Baltimore Orioles, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Players Association, 805 F.2d 663 , 678 n. 26 (7th Cir.1986); Brown v. Ames, 201 F.3d 654, 658 (5th cir.2000). … See Brown v. Ames, 201 F.3d 654, 658 (5th Cir.2000); Downing v. Abercrombie & Fitch, 265 F.3d 994, 1003-04 (9th Cir.2001).

Darras v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

622 F. Supp. 215 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 14, 1985

O’Rourke v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., 730 F.2d 842 , 851 (2d Cir.1984). … See, e.g., Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 8-9 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2845-46 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983) and this Court’s opinion in Frye v.

Bassick Mfg. Co. v. Larkin Automotive Parts Co.

19 F.2d 939 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 18, 1926

Brown, 10 F. (2d) 823, denies that a breaker arm assembled as a removable unit might be legitimately replaced by other than the owner of the patent. … Ed. 79 ; or the replacement of parts in Brown v. Puget Sound Co. (C. C.) 110 F. 383 .

Stokes v. City of Chicago

660 F. Supp. 1459 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 22, 1987

In Henderson v. … See Heidelberg v. Hammer, 577 F.2d 429 (7th Cir.1978), and Hampton v. Hanrahan, 600 F.2d 600, 633 (7th Cir.1979).

Marvin v. First Nat. Bank of Aurora, Ill.

10 F. Supp. 275 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 8, 1935

Sec, also, Cozzens, etc., Typesetting Co. v. Western Ranch, etc., Co., 112 Ill. App. 309 ; Chicago, etc., R. Co. v. Board of Sup’rs of Boone County, 44 Ill. 240 ; Jones, etc., Co. v. Crary, 234 Ill. 26 , 84 N. E. 651 . … In Ward v.

Langford v. County of Cook

965 F. Supp. 1091 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 8, 1997

Board of Educ., 979 F.2d 560, 563 (7th Cir.1992). Rutherford and Langford allege in general terms all the requirements of disability discrimination under the ADA. … Brown, -U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). 3 . Under some circumstances, terminating an employee in retaliation for the employee's use of benefits may be prohibited by ERISA. See Lindemann v.

Elagha v. Northwestern University

District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 13, 2025

While studying for the bar exam, on or about June 3, 2024, the Illinois Board of Law Admissions (“Board”) sent Elagha a letter requesting additional information to complete processing of her Character and Fitness … Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997), and Elagha’s amended complaint does not clear this high bar.

Paloian v. Geneva Seal, Inc. (In re Canopy Financial, Inc.)

477 B.R. 696 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 28, 2012

All of these purchases were concealed from Kashyap and the other members of the board and were not for business purposes. … See Crawford Sav. & Loan Ass’n v.

Gallardo v. Chicago Transit Authority

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 29, 2018

Board of Review’s decision sustaining Gallardo’s discharge. … Guzman v. Brown Cty., 884 F.3d 633, 641 (7th Cir. 2018) (citing Jackson v. City of Chicago, 414 F.3d 806, 810 (7th Cir. 2005)). The undisputed facts do not support a reasonable inference that Gallardo is disabled.

Iron Workers v. ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS

475 F. Supp. 2d 757 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 2, 2006

Articles V and VI of the Standard Agreement create a "Joint Conference Board" ("JCB") that is responsible for administering the Standard Agreement and for "the adjustment of jurisdictional disputes by arbitrators selected … In Boys Markets, Inc. v.