Case law

United States ex rel. Lash v. Cooper

952 F. Supp. 1245 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 23, 1996

The brown station wagon stopped and Lash got out and walked down the sidewalk toward Towns, passing about ten to fifteen feet from Hammond as he did so. … Farrell v. Lane, 939 F.2d 409, 410 (7th Cir.1991) (citing United States ex rel. Simmons v. Gramley, 915 F.2d 1128, 1132 (7th Cir.1990) and Engle v.

Tasner v. Billera

379 F. Supp. 815 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 5, 1974

Count V 1. … Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178 , 83 S.Ct. 227 , 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962); Komie v. Buehler Corporation, 440 F.2d 449 (9th Cir. 1971); PSG Co. v.

Leventhal v. Schenberg (In re Leventhal)

481 B.R. 409 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 9, 2012

His argument that he was entitled to conduct an in-depth examination of the Missouri Judgment largely based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127 , 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979). … Brown involved the application of the doctrine of res judicata, or claim preclusion, not the narrower doctrine of collateral estoppel, or issue preclusion.

RWT CORP. v. Wonderware Corp.

931 F. Supp. 583 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 3, 1996

The Board recognized that the words had different meanings, but found that the words were “associative terms.” 5 Moreover, the Board noted that the terms were not “in common usage as a portion of a business name.” … Sichel Sohne, GmbH v. Michel Monzain Selected Wines, Inc., 202 U.S.P.Q. 62 (T.T.A.B.1979), the Board refused to allow the mark “Blue Angel” to be registered after the holders of the mark “Blue Nun” opposed it.

Cote v. Eagle Stores, Inc.

526 F. Supp. 884 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 3, 1981

Baldin's exposition was reinforced in Miller v. … Union’s Executive Board discussed Cote’s discharge at its May 14, 1980 meeting.

Cosey v. City of Chicago

33 F. Supp. 2d 714 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 2, 1999

See Grabinger v. … It bears mention that this was not a case heard by the separate, Chicago Police Board. The Chicago Police Board has no jurisdiction to review the suspension of an accused when, as here, the suspension is 6 days or less.

Molloy v. Acero Charter Schools, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 10, 2019

Guzman v. Brown Cnty., 884 F.3d 633, 642 (7th Cir. 2018); see also Anderson v. … Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997) (emphasis omitted).

Panoramic Stock Images, Ltd. v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

963 F. Supp. 2d 842 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 28, 2013

The registration form for VA 1-002-221 lists the copyright claimant as Panoramic, and the authors of the images as “Mark Segal, James Schwabel, David Brown & 125 others” along with “Panoramic Images.” Doc. 9-5 at 4. … In Chicago Board of Education v.

Pratt v. Chicago Housing Authority

848 F. Supp. 792 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 7, 1994

The sweeps were explicitly authorized and directed by Vincent Lane, acting in his capacity as Chairman of the Board of Commissioners of the CHA, when he determined that the appropriate preconditions for a sweep had been met … United States v. Dorsey, 591 F.2d 922, 928 (D.C.Cir.1978).

Wenckaitis v. Specialty Contractors, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 30, 2024

See Farfaras v. … See Harman v.

Grana v. Illinois Department of Transportation

232 F. Supp. 2d 879 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 12, 2002

(Id. at ¶¶ 7-8.) 2 His memo also mentioned a sexual comment Mara made about Sandi Brown, an IDOT Civil Rights Investigator. (Id. at ¶ 7.) … See Halloway v. Milwaukee County, 180 F.3d 820, 826 (7th Cir.1999) (finding no adverse employment action where plaintiff temporarily had inadequate offices, support staff, and materials); see also Brown v.

Smith v. Greatbanc Trust Company

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 21, 2020

Smith alleges that the Individual Defendants, who also served on Triad’s Board of Directors (the “Board,” which is another defendant), “hand-picked” defendant Greatbanc Trust Company to act as the ESOP Trustee for … Dorman v. Charles Schwab & Co., No. 17-CV-00285-CW, 2018 WL 467357, at *5 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2018), rev’d sub nom. Dorman, 780 F. App’x 510; see also Brown ex rel. Henny Penny Corp. Emp. Stock Ownership Plan v.

Dow Corning Corp. v. Schpak

65 F.R.D. 72 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 13, 1974

Garden Homes , cited earlier; Henderson v. Midwest Refining Co., 43 F.2d 23 (10th Cir. 1930); Baron v. Brown, 83 F.Supp. 520 (S.D.N.Y.1949). … See Studebaker v. Salina Waterworks Co., 195 F. 164 (D.Kan.1912); Craig v. Champlin Petroleum Co., 300 F.Supp. 119 (D.Okl.1969), affirmed, 421 F.2d 236 (10th Cir. 1970); Seber v.

Vakharia v. Little Co. of Mary Hospital & Health Care Centers

2 F. Supp. 2d 1028 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 20, 1998

Roth (“Roth”), the Little Company of Mary Hospital and Health Care Centers (“Hospital”), the Hospital Board members (“the Board”), and Evergreen Anesthesia and Pain Management Services, S.C. … Vakharia declares that she is a “Board Certified Anesthesiologist” who “has been practicing medicine since 1974.” (Id. at ¶2.)

Children's Memorial Hospital v. Wilbert, Inc.

733 F. Supp. 2d 961 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 19, 2010

Doe v. … Central States Joint Board Trust Fund, No. 05 C 2686, 2006 WL 794772 (N.D.Ill., Mar. 27, 2006)(Zagel, J.), and DeBartolo v.

Ill v. Roland

812 F. Supp. 855 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 10, 1993

Wilson, 471 *858 U.S. at 269, 105 S.Ct. at 1943 ; Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478, 485-86 , 100 S.Ct. 1790, 1795-96 , 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980). … Sims v. Mulcahy, 902 F.2d 524, 542 (7th Cir.1990) (quoting Zook v. Brown, 865 F.2d 887, 895 (7th Cir.1989)).

Eisenberg Bros. v. Clear Shield National, Inc.

214 B.R. 338 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 23, 1997

See Zell v. … United States v. Brown (In re Brown), 79 B.R. 789, 792 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1987).

United States Gypsum Co. v. Lafarge North America Inc.

670 F. Supp. 2d 737 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 27, 2009

In the very similar case of Motorola, Inc. v. … Instead, she appears simply to have assumed that the mere disclosure of information contained in the board presentations caused compensable harm.

Gerrero v. Moyer

738 F. Supp. 1164 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 10, 1990

Gerrero remained as a parolee — a status allowing an alien to remain in the United States without formal “admission,” see Leng May Ma v. … The Board of Immigration *1166 Appeals has held that administrative closings do not constitute “final orders” for purposes of appeal to the Board, see Matter of Amico, Interim Dec. No. 3063 (Bd. Imm.App.

Teets v. Chicago, South Shore & South Bend Railroad

137 F. Supp. 340 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 5, 1955

Wilkerson v. McCarthy, 336 U.S. 53 , 69 S.Ct. 413 , 93 L.Ed. 497 . … Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 318 U.S. 54 , 63 S.Ct. 444, 453 , 87 L.Ed. 610 .