Case law

United States Dental Institute v. American Association of Orthodontists

396 F. Supp. 565 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 6, 1975

Louis meeting as members of the Board, and voted in favor of the adopted proposal. Defendant Muchnic attended the Houston meeting as a member of the Board and voted for the adopted proposal. … United States v. Real Estate Boards, 339 U. S. 485, 492 , 70 S.Ct. 711, 715 , 94 L.Ed. 1007 (1950); American Medical Association v.

American Massage Therapy Ass'n v. Folkers

308 F. Supp. 2d 899 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 16, 2004

P’ship v. La Luna Enters., 889 F.Supp. 324, 325 (N.D.Ill.1995), citing A.J. Canfield Co. v. Vess Beverages, Inc., 796 F.2d 903 (7th Cir.1986). AMTA easily satisfies these criteria. … Co., v. Meridian Ins. Group, Inc., 128 F.3d 1111, 1115 (7th Cir.1997).

United States v. General Dynamics Corporation

341 F. Supp. 534 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 13, 1972

Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, supra, at 370 U.S. 336 , 82 S.Ct. 1530 . See also Case-Swayne Co. v. … Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 346 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). See also United States v. Pennzoil Co., 252 F.Supp. 962, 979 (W.D.Pa.1965); United States v.

Crosetto v. Heffernan

810 F. Supp. 966 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 22, 1992

In Lathrop v. … Armstrong v. Board of Governors, 86 Wis.2d 746 , 273 N.W.2d 356 (1979), certain State Bar members requested a referendum on continued integration.

Morris v. BNSF Railway Company

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 23, 2025

Andrea Smith, BNSF’s Director of Labor Relations and a member of the Review Board, recommended termination. Id. … In February 2023, Morris spoke about his rejected applications with Jeremy Brown, Vice President at BNSF. Id. at ¶ 26. Brown asked Morris, “who would want to hire someone with a settlement against you?”

Anderson v. Moussa

250 F. Supp. 3d 344 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 13, 2017

See Brown v. King, 328 Ill.App.3d 717 , 262 Ill.Dec. 897 , 767 N.E.2d 357, 361 (2001) (“[A]n off-duty officer may often be found to be acting within the scope of his employment.’’) (collecting cases). … See Wolf v.

Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp. v. City of West Chicago

732 F. Supp. 922 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 15, 1990

An NRC Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (“ASLB”) was convened to resolve the matter. (¶ 15.) … Thus, unlike Brown v. Kerr-McGee Chemical Corporation, 767 F.2d 1234 (7th Cir.1985), there is no conflict between West Chicago’s Ordinance and regulations and the NRC regulatory action under the AEA.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Oak Lawn Ltd. II

987 F. Supp. 647 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 1, 1997

See NLRB v. … Thus, there is clearly common management and common boards and directors. 3. .

Van Drunen v. Village of South Holland

550 F. Supp. 258 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 23, 1982

England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, 375 U.S. 411, 422 , 84 S.Ct. 461, 468 , 11 L.Ed.2d 440 (1964); Lurie v. … See Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd., 420 U.S. at 605, 95 S.Ct. at 1208; Poulos v.

Citadel Group Ltd. v. Washington Regional Medical Center

784 F. Supp. 2d 949 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 22, 2011

In Sonnenblick-Goldman Corp. v. … Similarly, in Dawson v.

Stein v. Galitz

478 F. Supp. 517 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 30, 1978

To prescribe, by its board of directors, by-laws . “Seventh. … In Yates v.

United States ex rel. Hoover v. Elsea

501 F. Supp. 83 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 23, 1980

Board of Trustees of Junior College District No. 521 v. Webb, 24 Ill.App.3d 183 , 321 N.E.2d 127 (1974). … Johnson v. State Electrical Board, 53 Ill.2d 256 , 290 N.E.2d 886 (1972).

Consolidated Aluminum Corp. v. Foseco International Ltd.

716 F. Supp. 316 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 6, 1989

Precision Instrument Mfg. v. … Surgical Corp. v.

Watson v. Symons Corp.

121 F.R.D. 351 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 28, 1988

Peacock v. Board of School Commissioners of Indianapolis, 721 F.2d 210, 214 (7th Cir.1983); D.C. Federation of Civil Associations v. Volpe, 520 F.2d 451 (D.C.Cir.1975). … Peacock v. Board of School Commissioners of Indianapolis, 721 F.2d at 214 (“A Rule 60(b) motion cannot do service for an appeal.”); Bank of California v.

United States v. Walker

116 F. Supp. 863 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 19, 1953

Counsel for the defendant cite the case of United States v. Brown, D.C.Okl. 1925, 4 F.2d 270 , wherein an indictment was held defective for not alleging “any hearing, finding, or order of the Secretary” of a conspiracy. … The case of Kelly v. Union Stockyards & Transit Co. of Chicago, 7 Cir., 1951, 190 F.2d 860 , is also distinguishable.

Edwards v. Thomas

31 F. Supp. 2d 1069 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 7, 1999

But United States v. Brown, 31 F.3d 484, 492 (7th Cir.1994) (among other cases) has expressly said that “trial courts may admit evidence of prior or subsequent bad acts” as long as they satisfy the four-prong test. … As noted in Charles, 867 F.Supp. at 656 (citing Brown v.

Joseph v. Brierton

431 F. Supp. 50 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 19, 1976

Defendant Guards Defendants Sharp, Fleming, Hayes, Moran, Brown, Simmons, Koon and Daniels (“defendant guards”) were all employed as guards assigned to the detention hospital during Jones’ stay. … Thomas v. Pate, 493 F.2d 151 (7th Cir. 1974). Accordingly, defendants Venckus and Kruglik’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is denied. III.

Zabors v. Chatsworth Data Corp.

735 F. Supp. 2d 1010 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 2, 2010

In addition, Defendant argues that Plaintiffs California-based workers’ compensation retaliation claim (Count V) cannot be brought in this Court because the California Workers Compensation Appeals Board (“CWCAB”) retains … Proceedings under Section 132a “are to be instituted by filing an appropriate petition with the appeals board” as the board “is vested with full power, authority, and jurisdiction to try and determine finally all matters

Chris-Craft Industrial Products, Inc. v. Kuraray Co.

184 F.R.D. 605 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 25, 1999

Zuckert v. Berkliff Corp., 96 F.R.D. 161, 162 (N.D.Ill.1982). … member of Kuraray America’s board of directors would be required to be in Japan during the time of his noticed deposition.

Refco, Inc. v. Troika Investment Ltd.

702 F. Supp. 684 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 20, 1988

On October 16 that per-contract amount was $5,000 (¶ 11), but CME’s Board of Governors voted that day to raise it to $7,500 effective October 19. … Thus Romano v.