Case law

VODAK v. City of Chicago

624 F. Supp. 2d 933 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 27, 2009

The Parties The Class is represented by the following Plaintiffs: Sarah Bergstrand (“Bergstrand”), Prudence Browne (“Browne”), Robert Castillo (“Castillo”), Patrick Donnell (“Donnell”), Matthew Gaines (“Gaines”), Angela Garcia … Bd. of County Comm’rs of Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 407 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).

Fredrickson v. Proviso Township

814 F. Supp. 2d 802 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 23, 2010

In Hill v. … In the first, Nickum v.

National Advertising Co. v. City of Chicago

788 F. Supp. 994 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 8, 1991

In Metromedia, Inc. v. … In Wheeler v.

Kinesoft Development Corp. v. Softbank Holdings Inc.

139 F. Supp. 2d 869 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 16, 2001

Corp. v. … V.

DiFranco v. City of Chicago

642 F. Supp. 243 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 22, 1986

They rely on Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138 , 103 S.Ct. 1684 , 75 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983), and its progeny, see Zaky v. Veterans Administration, No. 85-1741, slip op. at 9-14 (7th Cir.1986); Linhart v. … Strauss v.

Murata Manufacturing Co. v. Bel Fuse, Inc.

422 F. Supp. 2d 934 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 14, 2006

Lindemann had been cited by Bel Fuse, itself, in the earlier briefing before Magistrate Judge Brown, and thus, did not require further review. … Corp. v.

Clemmer v. Office of the Chief Judge

544 F. Supp. 2d 722 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 8, 2008

See United States v. … Owen v. Mann, 105 Ill.2d 525, 532-33 , 86 Ill.Dec. 507 , 475 N.E.2d 886 (Ill.1985); People ex rel. The Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board v.

Local 189, Local 189, Service Employees Union v. Scot Lad Foods, Inc.

513 F. Supp. 839 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 29, 1981

Employees were represented by two separate unions, one of which brought the problem before the Railroad Adjustment Board (“Board”), a body quite similar to an arbitration panel. … See, Window Glass Cutters League v. American St. Gobain Corp., 428 F.2d 353 (3d Cir. 1970); Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. American Record & Broadcasting Association, 414 F.2d 1326 (2d Cir. 1969); Edmos Corp. v.

United States v. Ginsburg

705 F. Supp. 1310 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 2, 1989

Murray v. … Burchfield v.

Sanders v. E.A. Sween Company

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 2, 2024

In Baker v. … Brown v. Illinois Cent. R.R. Co., 254 F.3d 654, 658 (7th Cir. 2001).

State Oil Co. v. Khan

839 F. Supp. 543 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 3, 1993

Corp. v. Elefant, 790 F.2d 661, 667 (7th Cir.1986) (citing Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983)). … Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 12 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2847-48 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983).

Katta v. United States

774 F. Supp. 1134 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 30, 1991

Accordingly, the facts of Brown are inapposite here. Plaintiff also cites Cortez v. United States, 854 F.2d 723 (5th Cir.1988) in urging that the Feres doctrine does not preclude her suit. … In Boylan v.

Randle v. Bentsen

866 F. Supp. 1080 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 18, 1994

See Randle v. … In his prior complaints, Randle contested the merit board’s decision. In his second amended complaint, Randle does not contest the merit board’s decision.

Rudisill v. Flynn

470 F. Supp. 1269 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 31, 1979

on the board. 3 . … The village board of trustees allegedly ignored this communication.

Hosty v. Governors State University

174 F. Supp. 2d 782 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 30, 2001

Governors State and the board are arms of the state and may not be sued under § 1983. Kaimowitz v. Board of Tr. of Univ. of Ill., 951 F.2d 765, 767 (7th Cir.1991); Ranyard v. … See Fujishima v. Board of Educ., 460 F.2d 1355, 1357-58 (7th Cir.1972); Antonelli v. Hammond, 308 F.Supp. 1329 (D.Mass.1970); ACLU of Va. v. Radford Coll., 315 F.Supp. 893, 896-97 (W.D.Va.1970).

Ericksen v. Village of Willow Springs

876 F. Supp. 951 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 31, 1995

Malcak v. Westchester Park District, 754 F.2d 239, 242 (7th Cir.1985) (citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576-79 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2708-10 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)). … (Village) President with the approval of the Board of Trustees. _ Willow Springs, IL., Code, tit. 2, § 2-2-2(C); Complaint, ¶ 7. See also Corbitt v.

Adrow v. Johnson

623 F. Supp. 1085 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 12, 1985

See, e.g., United States v. Brown, 499 F.2d 829, 833-34 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1047 , 95 S.Ct. 619 , 42 L.Ed.2d 640 (1974); United States v. … Id. at 1219 (quoting United States v. Brown, 499 F.2d 829, 833 (7th Cir.1974)). Here the level of indignity of this intrusive search outweighs the "level of suspicion.”

Kneeland v. Bloom Township High School District No. 206

518 F. Supp. 890 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 18, 1981

Wang v. Lake Maxinhall Estates, Inc., 531 F.2d 832, 835 (7th Cir. 1976). … Grano v. Department of Development of City of Columbus, 637 F.2d 1073, 1081-82 (6th Cir. 1980); Mescall v. Burrus, 603 F.2d 1266, 1271 (7th Cir. 1979).

State of Illinois Ex Rel. Scott v. Butterfield

396 F. Supp. 632 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 16, 1975

In Hardy v. … Palisades Citizens Association, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 136 U.S.App.D. C. 346, 420 F.2d 188, 192 (1969). How strange it would be to hold now, with the advent of the N.E.P.A., that the Board has a lesser duty.

Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Chicago Rys. Co.

39 F.2d 958 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 16, 1929

See Hutchinson v. Philadelphia & G. S. S. Co. (D. C.) 216 F. 795 ; Hopkins v. Lancaster (D. C.) 254 F. 190 ; Cauffiel v. Lawrence (D. C.) 256 F. 714 ; King v. Barr (C. C. A.) 262 F. 56; Mueller v. Adler (C. C. … A.) 4 F.(2d) 334 ; Union Trust Co. v. Jones (C. C. A.) 16 F.(2d) 236 ; Board of Drainage Com’rs v. Lafayette Bank (C. C. A.) 27 F.(2d) 286 . Compare Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. v. Kansas City R. R. (C.