Case law

Alexander v. Continental Motor Werks, Inc.

933 F. Supp. 715 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 16, 1996

Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99, 102 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957). See also Hishon v. King & Spalding, 467 U.S. 69 , 104 S.Ct. 2229 , 81 L.Ed.2d 59 (1984); Doe on Behalf of Doe v. St. … As explained by the Board: For the most part, commenters agreed with the Board’s proposed treatment.

Leventhal v. Schenberg

484 B.R. 731 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 16, 2012

He first argues the court ignored controlling precedent in Brown v. … The Brown decision addresses the applicability of res judicata, not collateral estop-pel. Brown, 442 U.S. at 139 n. 10, 99 S.Ct. 2205 .

Smith v. Union Pacific Railroad

805 F. Supp. 2d 528 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 4, 2011

Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 , 127 S.Ct. 2197 , 167 L.Ed.2d 1081 (2007); McGowan v. … Moore v. Olson, 368 F.3d 757, 760 (7th Cir.2004); see also Morrison v.

Prince Manufacturing Co. v. United States

437 F. Supp. 1041 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 6, 1977

Y., Inc. v. B. & O. R. … Ry. v. Wichita Board of Trade, 412 U.S. 800, 812-813 , 93 S.Ct. 2367 , 37 L.Ed.2d 350 (1973). But we cannot assume that this burden encompasses coming forward with every conceivable method of releasing the cars.

O'Leary v. Luongo

692 F. Supp. 893 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 3, 1988

In Roberts v. … In Bohen v.

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Saga Foods, Inc.

407 F. Supp. 1247 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 12, 1976

Wkrs. v. General Electric Co., 407 F.2d 253 (2nd Cir. 1969); Sinclair Refining Company v. Atkinson, 290 F.2d 312 (7th Cir. 1961); Vulcan-Cincinnati, Inc. v. … See Golden State Bottling Co. v. NLRB, supra.

Anderson v. Luther

521 F. Supp. 91 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 11, 1981

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 456 F.2d 1339, 1346 (2nd Cir. 1972). See also Campbell v. Amax Coal Co., 610 F.2d 701 (10th Cir. 1979); Felder v. … See King v. United States, 492 F.2d 1337, 1338-39 (7th Cir. 1974); Brest v. Ciccone, 371 F.2d 981, 983 (8th Cir. 1967).

Shields on Behalf of Sundstrand Corp. v. Erickson

710 F. Supp. 686 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 28, 1989

Lewis v. Sporck, 612 F.Supp. at 1322-23 (ratification is not the only option; the board must be given a fair opportunity to decide whether the corporation itself should bring the suit). … Nor is there interest merely because the board receives payment for its services. Grobow v. Perot, 539 A.2d 180, 188 (Del.1988). Vague allegations of control or domination of the Board will not suffice to excuse demand.

Parks Ex Rel. Parks v. Pavkovic

557 F. Supp. 1280 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 28, 1983

See Tonya K. v. Chicago Board of Education, 551 F.Supp. 1107, 1111 (N.D.Ill.1982). … United States v. Board of School Commissioners, 677 F.2d 1185, 1194 (7th Cir.)

Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. United Transportation Union

330 F. Supp. 646 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 13, 1971

Trainmen v. Akron & Barberton B. R. … Trainmen v. Atlantic C. L. R.

Paull v. Chrysler Credit Corp.

544 F. Supp. 848 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 17, 1982

The Board’s commentary makes it clear that separate disclosure is optional. Conceivably, in an exceptional case, the Board might consider separate disclosure necessary to provide meaningful disclosure. … Instead he relies solely on Gilbert v.

Schneider v. County of Will, State of Illinois

190 F. Supp. 2d 1082 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 14, 2002

Inc. v. … Freilich v. Board of Directors of Upper Chesapeake Health, Inc., 142 F.Supp.2d 679 (D.Md.2001); Oliveras-Sifre v. Puerto Rico Dept. of Health, 214 F.3d 23 (1st Cir.2000).

Chicago & Western Indiana Railroad v. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employes

221 F. Supp. 561 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 29, 1963

On June 4, a representative of the National Mediation Board arrived in Chicago and commenced his mediatory efforts with the parties. This Board representative is continuing his efforts to mediate the dispute. 22. … each of these actions is a “major dispute” under the Railway Labor Act and as that term has been defined and interpreted by decisions of the Supreme Court since the “River Road” case (Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen etc., v.

Rothman v. Emory University

828 F. Supp. 537 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 29, 1993

See also Cromley v. Board of Education of Lockport Township High School Dist. 205, 699 F.Supp. 1283 (N.D.Ill.1988). … Because the Board is a quasi-judicial body, those communications were absolutely privileged under Illinois law. Kalish v. Illinois Education Ass’n, 157 Ill.

Viverito v. Levi

395 F. Supp. 47 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 18, 1975

See Doeskin Products, Inc. v. United Paper Co., 195 F.2d 356, 358 (7th Cir. 1952). Plaintiff also attacks the constitutionality of the Federal statute. A similar New York statute was upheld in DeVeau v. … Braisted, 363 U.S. 144 , 80 S.Ct. 1146 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1109 (1960); see also Presser v. Brennan, 389 F.Supp. 808, 812 (N.D.Ohio 1975).

Communications Workers of America v. Illinois Bell Telephone Company

553 F. Supp. 144 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 24, 1982

Urbina v. Quern, 482 F.Supp. 1013, 1016 (N.D.Ill.1980); Wheeler v. Durham City Board of Education, 88 F.R.D. 27, 29 (M.D.N.C.1980). Turning to the hourly rates sought by Messrs. … There is precedent in this district for the deduction of transportation expenses from fee awards, Harceg v. Brown, 536 F.Supp. 125, 135 (N.D.Ill.1982).

Hwang v. Board of Education for Oak Park and River Forest High School District 200

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 26, 2025

Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim [Dkt. 15] filed by Defendants the Board … P.F. by A.F. v.

Hicks v. Clyde Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

722 F. Supp. 501 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 5, 1989

Similarly, in Petrik v. … In Johnson v.

Sofferin v. American Airlines, Inc.

713 F. Supp. 1219 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 23, 1989

In Lyda v. … See Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 152 , 104 S.Ct. 1723, 1726 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984) (“One who fails to act diligently cannot invoke equitable principles to excuse that lack of diligence.”).

Gurgone v. City of Chicago

587 F. Supp. 1347 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 29, 1984

Arant v. Lane, 249 U.S. 367 , 39 S.Ct. 293 , 63 L.Ed. 650 (1919), quoted in Brown v. United States, 418 F.2d 442, 444 (5th Cir.1980). … Mount Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977); Nekolny v. Painter, 653 F.2d 1164 (1981).