Case law

Dynamics Corp. of America v. CTS Corp.

638 F. Supp. 802 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 20, 1986

Consistent with our constitutional obligations under Erie v. … MacAnderews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173, 180 (Del.1986); Moran v. Household International Inc., 500 A.2d 1346, 1356 (Del.1985); and Unocal v. Mesa Petroleum Co., 493 A.2d 946, 954 (Del.1985).

Kulovitz v. Illinois High School Ass'n

462 F. Supp. 875 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 21, 1978

The Board affirmed and the plaintiff was notified October 31. 2 In finding him ineligible, the Board relied on the Association’s transfer rule. … Although plaintiff could establish the existence of a property interest by reference to state law or custom, see Board of Curators v.

United States v. I.C. Industries, Inc.

555 F. Supp. 219 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 12, 1983

In United States v. … Brown, 478 F.2d 1038, 1040 (7th Cir.1973), acknowledged only a narrow possibility of extending the attorney-client privilege to accountant-client communicators (quoting from the Second Circuit in United States v.

Rothman v. Emory University

828 F. Supp. 537 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 29, 1993

See also Cromley v. Board of Education of Lockport Township High School Dist. 205, 699 F.Supp. 1283 (N.D.Ill.1988). … Because the Board is a quasi-judicial body, those communications were absolutely privileged under Illinois law. Kalish v. Illinois Education Ass’n, 157 Ill.

Hicks v. Clyde Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

722 F. Supp. 501 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 5, 1989

Similarly, in Petrik v. … In Johnson v.

Ohio-Sealy Mattress Manufacturing Co. v. Kaplan

545 F. Supp. 765 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 20, 1982

Brunswick Corporation v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., supra, 429 U.S. at 488 , 97 S.Ct. at 697 ; Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 320 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1521 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). … of section 8 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 19 , in that most of the Sealy board members also sat on the boards of its licensees.

Butts v. Bowen

778 F. Supp. 453 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 27, 1991

See Lopez, supra (Melkonyan applies prospectively); Brown v. Sullivan, 1991 WL 225012 (E.D.Pa. Oct. 29, 1991) (same); Miller v. Sullivan, 1991 *454 WL 165067 (E.D.Pa. Aug. 23, 1991) (same); Audette v. … Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v.

Grantham v. Beatrice Co.

776 F. Supp. 391 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 4, 1991

In Chavero v. … Wardle v.

Johnson v. Loftus

544 F. Supp. 2d 683 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 1, 2008

Doyle v. … On cross, she added that he was wearing black pants and a brown jacket. (R. at J — 17.)

Jackson v. Illinois Department of Corrections

567 F. Supp. 1021 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 1, 1983

Just two months ago, in Olim v. … (“Rule”) 12(b)(6) motion (Mathers Fund, Inc. v.

Citizens for Community Action v. City of Chicago

455 F. Supp. 2d 802 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 13, 2006

Hennessy (“Hennessy”), Tommy Johnson (“Johnson”), Barry Berman (“Berman”), and Gerald Brown (“Brown”). On April 29, 2005, I granted a motion to dismiss claims brought by plaintiffs CCA and Strnad. … V.

DeSalle v. Wright

762 F. Supp. 229 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 11, 1991

Louis DeSalle (“DeSalle”) sues Illinois Department of Professional Regulation (“Department”) Director Kevin Wright (“Wright”) 1 and the members of the Illinois Medical Licensing Board (“Board”)— Jere Fridheim, M.D., Arvind … Illinois Real Estate Administration & Disciplinary Board, 884 F.2d 955, 957 (7th Cir.1989)), but as Board of Regents of State Colleges v.

Balanoff v. Donovan

569 F. Supp. 962 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 18, 1983

Balanoff v. Donovan, 549 F.Supp. 102 (N.D.Ill.1982) (Balanoff I). … Fay v. Marshall, 106 L.R.R.M. 2047 , 2048 (D.Nev.1980); Fletcher v. Dunlop, 91 L.R.R.M. 2113 (N.D.Ill.1975).

Inland Mortgage Capital Corp. v. Chivas Retail Partners, LLC

841 F. Supp. 2d 1029 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 24, 2012

Those waivers are undertaken “[t]o the extent permitted by law,” and on that score such cases as Chrysler Credit Corp. v. … BROWN, JR., Individually [Seal] /§/ TIM J. DOLLANDER, AS TRUSTEE OF THE WALTER L. BROWN, JR. REVOCABLE TRUST [Seal] /§/ WALTER L. BROWN, JR., AS TRUSTEE OF THE WALTER L.

Blackett v. Clinton E. Frank, Inc.

379 F. Supp. 941 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 19, 1974

Herpich v. Wallace, supra. … Clayton v. James B. Clow & Sons, 327 F.2d 382 (7th Cir. 1964); Ryan v. J. Walter Thompson Company, 322 F.Supp 307 (S.D.N.Y. 1971), aff’d supra; Gifford v. Rich, 58 Ill.App.2d 405 , 208 N.E.2d 47 (1965); Arentsen v.

Communications Workers of America v. Illinois Bell Telephone Company

553 F. Supp. 144 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 24, 1982

Urbina v. Quern, 482 F.Supp. 1013, 1016 (N.D.Ill.1980); Wheeler v. Durham City Board of Education, 88 F.R.D. 27, 29 (M.D.N.C.1980). Turning to the hourly rates sought by Messrs. … There is precedent in this district for the deduction of transportation expenses from fee awards, Harceg v. Brown, 536 F.Supp. 125, 135 (N.D.Ill.1982).

Shields on Behalf of Sundstrand Corp. v. Erickson

710 F. Supp. 686 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 28, 1989

Lewis v. Sporck, 612 F.Supp. at 1322-23 (ratification is not the only option; the board must be given a fair opportunity to decide whether the corporation itself should bring the suit). … Nor is there interest merely because the board receives payment for its services. Grobow v. Perot, 539 A.2d 180, 188 (Del.1988). Vague allegations of control or domination of the Board will not suffice to excuse demand.

Jones-Redmond v. Thornton Fractional Township H.S. Dist. 215

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 5, 2024

See Simpson v. Brown Cnty., 860 F.3d 1001, 1006 (7th Cir. 2017). … of Educ. v.

Parks Ex Rel. Parks v. Pavkovic

557 F. Supp. 1280 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 28, 1983

See Tonya K. v. Chicago Board of Education, 551 F.Supp. 1107, 1111 (N.D.Ill.1982). … United States v. Board of School Commissioners, 677 F.2d 1185, 1194 (7th Cir.)

Leventhal v. Schenberg

484 B.R. 731 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 16, 2012

He first argues the court ignored controlling precedent in Brown v. … The Brown decision addresses the applicability of res judicata, not collateral estop-pel. Brown, 442 U.S. at 139 n. 10, 99 S.Ct. 2205 .