Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.52s
Hickman v. Board of Education Hinsdale Township, Hinsdale High School District 86
District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 29, 2023
.; Medina as next friend for N.M. v. Izquierdo, 594 F. Supp. 3d 1045, 1063 (N.D. Ill. 2022). And the Illinois School Code expressly permits a school board—not a school district or school—to be sued. Klean v. … Thus, the Board— not the School District or the School—is amenable to suit. See Snow v. J.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBosco v. Chicago Transit Authority
164 F. Supp. 2d 1040 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 18, 2001
Maine v. … E.g., Felt v. Board of Trustees of Judges Ret. Sys., 107 Ill.2d 158 , 89 Ill.Dec. 855 , 481 N.E.2d 698 (1985); Kraus, 72 Ill.App.3d 833 , 28 Ill.Dec. 691 , 390 N.E.2d 1281 ; Miller v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedFrantz v. Sheet Metal Workers Union Local No. 73
470 F. Supp. 223 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 10, 1979
E. g., Purcell v. Keane, 406 F.2d 1195 (3d Cir. 1969); Holdeman v. … In Horner v.
Cited 5 timesPublished90 F. Supp. 2d 930 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 2, 2000
The plaintiffs agree that the retaliatory discharge claim (count VII) against Gross, Rayle, and the Town Police Board, and the breach of contract claim and retaliatory discharge claim (counts V-VII ) against Rayle should … Alswang v.
Cited 1 timesPublished50 F. Supp. 2d 816 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 7, 1999
DEFERENCE TO THE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD The Federal Reserve Board has been designated as the primary authority for interpreting and applying TILA. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. … Thus, the Board viewed the proposed comment as a clarification. Proposed comment 18(g)-4 also reflected the existing case law at that time. See Graves v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedKogucki v. Metropolitan Water Reclamation District
698 F. Supp. 2d 1026 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 17, 2010
(emphasis supplied); Sun v. Board of Trustees of University of IL, 473 F.3d 799 , 813 (7th Cir.2007) (same); Schuster v. … See Brown, 581 F.3d at 183 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedHarder v. Village of Forest Park
466 F. Supp. 2d 1000 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 9, 2006
It is clear, however, that the Board’s determination might moot or narrow the issue and we should allow that process to do so, potentially rendering a constitutional decision unnecessary. See Jack & Lou’s, Inc. v. … Both parties point to the testimony from the Board hearing to support their claims. We cannot, however, look beyond the four corners of the complaint in determining whether plaintiff has stated a claim. Palda v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedFreeman v. The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 29, 2018
Claims Brought against Board and Lubin in his Official Capacity UIC Defendants move to dismiss the claims brought against the Board and against Lubin in his official capacity. … Quinn, 680 F.3d 875, 881 (7th Cir. 2012)(quoting Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651, 663 (1974)). The Board is deemed an instrumentality of the State of Illinois and is protected by the Eleventh Amendment.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSocialist Workers Party v. Ogilvie
357 F. Supp. 109 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 21, 1972
Board of Education, 309 F.Supp. 630 (N.D.Ill.1969) (three-judge court) (similar oath for Illinois teachers held unconstitutional) ; Connell v. … See also Elfbrandt v. Russell, 384 U.S. 11 , 86 S.Ct. 1238 , 16 L.Ed.2d 321 (1966); Keyishain v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967); Whitehill v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedStarfish Transportation, Inc. v. Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 19, 2023
The Court held in Brock v. … Vukadinovich v. Board of School Trustees of Michigan City Area Schools, 978 F.2d 403, 409 (7th Cir. 1992).
Cited 0 timesUnknownLevitin v. Northwest Community Hospital
64 F. Supp. 3d 1107 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 12, 2014
NCH’s Board of Directors (“Board”) is its controlling and governing body. Id. at ¶ 51. … See Vance v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedAmerican International Group, Inc. v. Ace Ina Holdings, Inc.
722 F. Supp. 2d 948 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 30, 2010
This decision came despite the Pool Board’s knowledge of evidence warranting investigation into underreporting by four companies on the Pool Board and Sentry. … See Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v.
Cited 2 timesPublished985 F. Supp. 747 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 12, 1997
Board of Educ., 46 F.3d 682, 684 (7th Cir. 1995)). … , of Regents v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedRittmeyer v. Advance Bancorp, Inc.
868 F. Supp. 1017 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 2, 1994
Id.; American Agriculture Movement, Inc. v. Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, 848 F.Supp. 814, 817 (N.D.Ill.1994). … Even if we were to find the overlap in directors and management to be significant, the single employer doctrine requires more than simply an overlap in boards or management. See Johnson v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedBoard of Education of Joliet Township High School, District 204 v. Publicis Health, LLC
District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 8, 2025
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION BOARD OF EDUCATION … See Guise v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown435 F. Supp. 1295 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 19, 1977
For the reasons which we stated in Williams v. Brown, supra, we respectfully differ with the Court of Appeals. Accord: Wiley v. Memphis Police Dept. 548 F.2d 1247, 1254 (6th Cir. 1977); Amen v. … Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 501 F.2d 31, 44 (3d Cir. 1974), vacated on other grounds, 421 U.S. 983 , 95 S.Ct. 1986 , 44 L.Ed.2d 474 (1975); Cox v. Stanton, 529 F.2d 47, 50 (4th Cir. 1975); Roane v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedHinsdale Hospital Corp. v. Shalala
857 F. Supp. 621 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 22, 1994
On March 21,1994, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“Report”) recommending that the Review Board’s decision be reversed in favor of the plaintiff: Hinsdale Hosp. Corp. v. … Portland Adventist Medical Ctr. v. Heckler, 561 F.Supp. 1092, 1095 (D.D.C.1983). The Review Board affirmed the intermediary’s decision.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBernard v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
90 F.R.D. 388 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 28, 1981
The issue before Board No. 1518 was the priority of seniority and this Board found in favor of the plaintiff. … The defendants contend, relying principally upon Nix v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedAMERICAN FED. OF GOV. EMP. v. RR Retirement Bd.
742 F. Supp. 450 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 28, 1990
See Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968); Rutan v. … Dept. of Justice v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 27, 2026
A municipal entity, “such as a board of education,” may be sued under § 1983. Bennett v. Roberts, 295 F.3d 687, 699 (7th Cir. 2002); Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs. of City of New York, 436 U.S. 658, 694–95 (1978). … V.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna