Case law

Hobley v. Burge

445 F. Supp. 2d 990 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 10, 2006

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, United States Magistrate Judge. … See, e.g., *999 Shell Oil Co. v.

United States v. Rockford Memorial Corp.

717 F. Supp. 1251 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 23, 1989

The Supreme Court’s decision in Brown Shoe v. … In U.S. v.

Joas v. Zimmer, Inc.

218 F. Supp. 3d 700 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 21, 2016

Though an expert is not required to “exclude all alternatives with certainty,” Brown, 765 F.3d at 773 (citing Gayton v. … Corp. v.

Evain v. Conlisk

364 F. Supp. 1188 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 13, 1973

McCabe v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 235 U.S. 151 , 35 S.Ct. 69 , 59 L.Ed. 169 ; State of Mo. ex rel. Gaines v. Canada, 305 U.S. 337 , 59 S.Ct. 232 , 83 L.Ed. 208 ; Brown v. … Board of *1191 Trustees of LaGrange Independent School Dist. et al., 5th Cir., 187 F.2d 20 .

Holmes v. Silver Cross Hospital of Joliet, Illinois

340 F. Supp. 125 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 17, 1972

Board of Trade, 311 F.2d 524 (7th Cir. 1963), cert. denied 374 U.S. 806 , 83 S.Ct. 1693 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1963); Cotillion Club, Inc. v. Detroit Real Estate Board, 303 F.Supp. 850 (E.D.Mich.1964). … Browns v. Mitchell, 409 F.2d 593 (10th Cir. 1969).

Nehf v. United States

302 F. Supp. 356 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 25, 1969

Bartell v. Riddell, 202 F.Supp. 70, 74 (S.D.Cal.1962). Even assuming the correctness of this position, (but see, Morris v. … Lomax v. United States, *360 155 F.Supp. 354, 358 (E.D.Penn.1957); Huntington Steel Corp. v. United States, 153 F.Supp. 920, 923 (S.D.N.Y.1957).

Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Authority

4 F. Supp. 2d 757 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 23, 1998

Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Authority, 304 F.Supp. 736 . (N.D.Ill.1969). … (citing Brown v. Board of Educ., 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954)) (emphasis added).

Maes v. Folberg

504 F. Supp. 2d 339 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 27, 2007

Plaintiff also brings a claim under the FMLA against the Board of Trustees. … See People v.

Chatman v. Board Of Education City Of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 29, 2021

Little v. Mitsubishi Motors N. Am., Inc., 514 F.3d 699, 702 (7th Cir. 2008); Winniczek v. Nagelberg, 400 F.3d 503, 504 (7th Cir. 2005). … Majeske v. City of Chicago, 218 F.3d 816, 825 (7th Cir. 2000).

Coleman v. McLaren

635 F. Supp. 266 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 14, 1986

Blum v. … And in Hamilton v.

Bowman v. City of Chicago Board of Education

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 25, 2021

There is also no need to keep the individual defendants in the case in their official capacities– this would indeed be redundant with suing the Board. See Carver v. … See, e.g., Taylor v.

Cain v. Budz

494 F. Supp. 2d 900 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 18, 2007

Brown, 398 F.3d at 910 (quoting Henderson v. Sheahan, 196 F.3d 839 , 844 n. 2 (7th Cir.1999)); see also Board v. Farnham, 394 F.3d 469, 477-78 (7th Cir.2005) (citing West v. … See Johnson v. Snyder, 444 F.3d 579, 584 (7th Cir.2006) (citing Zentmyer v. Kendall County, 220 F.3d 805 , 810 (7th Cir.2000)); Board, 394 F.3d at 478 (citing Cavalieri v.

Federal Trade Commission v. Pacific First Benefit, LLC

361 F. Supp. 2d 751 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 18, 2005

Judge Brown then quoted the following passage from the Supreme Court decision in Braswell v. … Def.’s Objections to Magistrate Judge Brown’s Ruling, Ex. A, 12; see also United States v.

Jamison v. McCurrie

388 F. Supp. 990 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 3, 1975

See, e. g., Brown v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago, 386 F.Supp. 110 (N.D.Ill.1974); Maybanks v. Ingraham, 378 F.Supp. 913 (E.D.Pa.1974). … In both Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 , 81 S.Ct. 473 , 5 L.Ed.2d 492 (1961) and Moor v.

Telephone Commercial Employees Union v. Eisenberg

587 F. Supp. 546 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 19, 1984

On January 31, 1984, AT & TC filed a unit clarification petition with Region 22 of defendant, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”). Defendant Arthur Eisenberg is the Regional Director of Region 22. … DISCUSSION As a general rule, “the administrative remedies extant before the Labor Board must be exhausted as a prerequisite to federal jurisdiction,” Grutka, v. Barbour, 549 F.2d 5, 7 (7th Cir.1977). See Myers v.

Lazarou v. American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 11, 2020

State medical licensing boards grant physicians licenses to practice medicine. … ABPN is one of 24 member medical boards within the umbrella organization of the American Board of Medical Specialties (“ABMS”). [1] at 4 ¶ 14.

Wieboldt Stores, Inc. v. Schottenstein

94 B.R. 488 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 1, 1988

Reagan v. … A corporate board of directors has a fundamental duty to protect the corporate enterprise from “harm reasonably perceived, irrespective of its source.” Unocal Corp. v.

Hickey v. City of Chicago Board of Education

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 13, 2021

Khowaja v. Sessions, 893 F.3d 1010, 1014-15 (7th Cir. 2018). … s Opening Mem. at 4; see Nichols v. S. Ill. Univ.

Doe v. Chicago Public Schools

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 2, 2019

See Gross v. … Because Doe has not shown that the Board’s conduct was willful or wanton, the Board is immune from his negligence claim. V. Conclusion The Board’s motion for summary judgment [91] is granted.

United States v. Dansberry

500 F. Supp. 140 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 21, 1980

The test for determining Brown’s status is whether, in the light of all the circumstances, Brown must be regarded as having acted as an instrument or agent of the state. Coolidge v. … People v.