Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.55s
2020 IL App (1st) 171728 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 30, 2020
The parties agree that despite its digital nature, the Facebook messages qualify as documents for admissibility purposes. See People v. … Where, as here, the trial court clearly had the opportunity to review the same essential claim that is later raised on appeal, there is no forfeiture. People v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedAppellate Court of Illinois · May 7, 1999
Since at least September 1986, G.S. had been infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the causative agent of the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). … G.S. testified that the telephone call occurred on September 22, 1986, and he explained why the telephone call had such a substantial impact on him and why he remembered it so clearly.
Cited 0 timesPublished360 Ill. Dec. 832 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 7, 2012
respondent was still incarcerated, the minor had not visited respondent in "a long time," he had not completed substance abuse treatment, and, although respondent attended Narcotics Anonymous meetings, "that doesn't * * * qualify … I applaud the Winnebago County public defender for establishing separate conflicts divisions.
Cited 7 timesPublishedCarroll v. Chicago Housing Authority
30 N.E.3d 326 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 24, 2015
¶ 31 The HCV program is clearly an important benefit provided to qualified persons and families by the government. … Given the mitigating circumstances discussed, we find that the decision to terminate plaintiff's assistance in the HCV program was clearly erroneous.
Cited 1 timesUnpublished2017 IL App (5th) 120079-B · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 10, 2017
¶ 27 In the instant case, the surveillance video clearly shows someone carrying a bucket, soda bottle, and hose in between anhydrous ammonia tanks whose caps had been removed. … If no prejudice to the defendant is established, there is no need to separately determine whether counsel’s performance was deficient. People v.
Cited 1 timesUnpublished77 Ill. App. 3d 791 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 30, 1979
The evidence in question was clearly introduced for this specific purpose and a limiting instruction was given. … The qualifying word limits the scope of the property to be seized and curtails the discretion of the officers executing the warrant.
Cited 25 timesPublished194 N.E.3d 1027 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 22, 2021
Subject to all other requirements and provisions under this Section, this paragraph (7) does not apply to the lawful consumption of cannabis by a qualifying patient licensed under the Compassionate Use of Medical … Defendant has failed to establish clear or obvious error, and therefore, we hold him to his forfeiture. ¶ 47 Although we find defendant has failed to establish any error with the trial court’s acceptance
Cited 13 timesPublished2014 IL App (4th) 120721 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 5, 2014
All such fees collected shall be deposited by the county in a fund to be established and known as the County Jail Medical Costs Fund. … In Marshall, the court held trial courts are authorized “to order the taking, analysis and indexing of a qualifying offender’s DNA, and the payment of the analysis fee only where that defendant is not currently
Cited 19 timesPublishedDepartment of Transportation v. East Side Development, L.L.C.
384 Ill. App. 3d 295 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 31, 2008
Adams argues that the amendment clearly provides for separate compensation to owners of lawfully erected off-premises outdoor advertising signs. … It has been long established that the value of condemned property is considered as a whole, not the sum of its parts.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDirect Auto Insurance Co. v. Merx
443 Ill. Dec. 488 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 22, 2020
However, an insurance contract “will not be invalidated unless it is clearly contrary to what the constitution, the statutes, or the decisions of the courts have declared to be the public policy of Illinois or unless the … However, once a person qualifies as an insured for purposes of the policy’s bodily injury liability provisions, she must be treated as an insured for purposes of uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage as well.”
Cited 8 timesPublished2025 IL App (1st) 230821-U · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 17, 2025
Travis testified that ASPD and OSPD Non-Consent were “intertwined” as qualifying mental disorders under the SVP Act and the alcohol and substance use disorder “disinhibited behavior even further” and also qualified under … Thus, the trial court’s decision to sustain the State’s objection was not arbitrary, fanciful, or clearly unreasonable.
Cited 1 timesUnpublishedAppellate Court of Illinois · Jun 17, 1998
After qualifying Dr. Chira as an expert in forensic pathology, the State inquired about the manner of death of the two victims in this case, on both of whom Dr. Chira had performed autopsies. … The witnesses clearly and unequivocally identified defendants as the perpetrators at the in-person line-ups and in court; Grande also so identified them when she was presented with the photo array.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBob Red Remodeling, Inc. v. The Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission
2014 IL App (1st) 132137WC · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 9, 2015
It further noted that respondent did not offer any evidence to establish that a job market existed for claimant. … As claimant was following the advice of his own qualified physician, we could not say that his choices were unreasonable.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedPank v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.
314 Ill. App. 53 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 23, 1942
Both trustees qualified and proceeded to carry out the trust. … corporate trustee, the custodian of the trust assets, is entitled to take reasonable action during the absence from the country of its co-trustee, for the preservation of trust assets pursuant to policies of retention of assets clearly
Cited 1 timesPublished2023 IL App (1st) 231833-U · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 18, 2023
“A finding is against the manifest weight of the evidence only if the opposite conclusion is clearly evident or the finding itself is unreasonable, arbitrary, or not based on the evidence presented.” People v. … Subsection 110-10(a) establishes a number of mandatory conditions that must be imposed for defendants released prior to trial. 725 ILCS 5/110-10(a) (West 2022).
Cited 4 timesUnpublished2014 IL App (4th) 140360 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 12, 2014
The Service Plans ¶ 26 Four service plans were established for the family members. The first one covered the period of April to July 2012. … App. 3d 248, 256 (1992) (“For a judgment to be against the manifest weight of the evidence, an opposite conclusion must be clearly evident.”).
Cited 105 timesPublished179 Ill. App. 3d 249 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 23, 1989
All the challenged rulings rested within the discretion of the trial court, however, and an examination of the record shows that in no case were the trial court’s rulings clearly erroneous. … Blake contends that matching the description and having blood on his jacket was not sufficient to establish probable cause, citing People v.
Cited 1 timesPublished2014 IL App (1st) 121740 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 28, 2014
Thus, he was in no way qualified to render the opinion that defense counsel never asked him for in open court, despite the fact that it may have been in his written report. When the court qualified Dr. … The subject matter here was couched in biomechanical terms that he was clearly not qualified to render and would not have assisted the jury in understanding the evidence or made the question of defendant's guilt more or
Cited 0 timesUnpublished257 N.E.3d 639 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 12, 2024
¶ 13 Lincolnshire investigator Adam Hyde, whom the trial court also qualified as an accident- reconstruction expert, testified that he investigated the case. … Moreover, supreme court precedent clearly permits us to consider the oral argument in that appeal. See People v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBob Red Remodeling, Inc. v. The Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission
2014 IL App (1st) 130974WC · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 12, 2015
It further noted that respondent did not offer any evidence to establish that a job market existed for claimant. … As claimant was following the advice of his own qualified physician, we could not say that his choices were unreasonable.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna