Case law

Walworth Investments-LG, LLC v. Mu Sigma, Inc.

2021 IL App (1st) 191937 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 30, 2021

These facts, however, do not conclusively establish that Mu Sigma’s repurchase of plaintiff’s stock shares was an individual stockholder transaction. … (2) Does section 3(e) of the SRA clearly encompass all of Walworth’s allegations?

Tidwell v. Chapman

2026 IL App (5th) 250428-U · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 13, 2026

Asselmeier, and other unspecified defendants, are to provide plaintiff with (1) “quarterly cleanings from a qualified dental hygienist, including scaling and root planing,” (2) “adequate supplies and instruction to maintain … To the contrary, this court is entitled to have the issues on appeal clearly defined, and to have pertinent authority cited and a coherent legal argument presented. Id.

People v. Woodring

2020 IL App (4th) 180158-U · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 12, 2020

Baluka also testified that the crime lab report alone could not establish whether a person was impaired. ¶ 21 Dr. … The court was clearly seeking to deter others from engaging in similar conduct by imposing a 12- year sentence.

Kinsella v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

27 N.E.3d 226 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 10, 2015

¶ 28 The Board contends that the above-cited rules and policy statements establish that it has a zero-tolerance alcohol workplace policy, which a plain reading of these same rules and policy statements clearly does … While evidence regarding retrograde extrapolation is admissible, it must be presented with a proper foundation and testified to by a qualified expert. People v. Ikerman, 2012 IL App (5th) 110299 ¶ 38.

Co. of Kankakee v. Anthony

Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 22, 1999

Upon moving to the Kankakee area, the Anthonys decided to establish a parochial school for their two children and the children of other Seventh-day Adventists in the area. … In this regard, the General Assembly has established certain procedures which govern the manner in which county boards carry out their legislative function.

In Re MW

897 N.E.2d 409 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 31, 2008

She needed to be referred to a highly qualified mental health professional with experience in working with individuals with severe character disorders. … A trial court's finding is against the manifest weight of the evidence if a review of the record clearly demonstrates that the opposite result would be the proper one.

Schlenz v. Castle

132 Ill. App. 3d 993 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 24, 1985

Johnson (1983), 98 Ill. 2d 87, 100, 102 , whether a particular piece of property qualifies for tax exemption depends on questions of fact. … Clearly, also, the document indicates in a footnote the procedure to be followed for appeal of the board’s decision to the property tax appeal board.

Board of Education of Gardner-South Wilmington High School District 73 v. Village of Gardner

387 Ill. Dec. 145 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 17, 2014

as a redevelopment project cost to authorize the Village's payment of tax increment funds to the District, the license agreement clearly qualifies. … The agreement clearly grants the Village a mere license, and there is no genuine contention that the District actually granted the Village a lease to its recreational facilities.

City of Bloomington v. Illinois Labor Relations Board

373 Ill. App. 3d 599 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 3, 2007

Through the change in the law, the legislature declared persons such as the defendants temporarily qualified and removed the basis upon which injunctive relief was appropriate. … “A statute should not be construed to effect a change in the settled law of the State unless its terms clearly require such a construction.”

McHenry Savings Bank v. Daniel

2021 IL App (1st) 210070-U · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 27, 2021

Plaintiff argued that under section 15- 1701(b)(1) of the IMFL (735 ILCS 5/15-1701 (West 2020)), five units of the property, those not occupied by Margaret, did not qualify as “residential real estate” for purposes of the … Even if we did not consider the complaint, the affidavit of Ollech, plaintiff’s chief credit officer, was sufficient to establish default.

Foster v. Hillsboro Area Hospital, Inc.

2016 IL App (5th) 150055 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 13, 2017

According to the terms of the contract, IEP agreed to staff Hillsboro Area Hospital’s emergency department with qualified physicians 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. … This is particularly true in this case, where the record clearly demonstrates that more than one forum has a significant relationship to the issues raised herein, the chosen forum is contiguous to Montgomery

Warrender v. Millsop

304 Ill. App. 3d 260 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 23, 1999

App. 3d at 538 -39: “Rule 213 establishes more exacting standards regarding disclosure than did Supreme Court Rule 220 *** which formerly governed expert witnesses. … Certainly the timing of Long’s disclosures did not impede Poehlmann’s ability to retain and disclose a qualified expert by August 28. The fifth factor is the timeliness of plaintiff’s objection.

People v. Calabrese

Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 26, 2010

However, he testified that he could see clearly. He smoked marijuana on a daily basis, usually about half an ounce. … The State informed the court that it elected to give Patrick witness use immunity.

People v. Binion

2020 IL App (1st) 182538-U · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 25, 2020

¶ 24 But even if the violent nature of Veal’s vehicle being stolen had some relevance, it was clearly and substantially outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice. … ¶ 27 Under the first approach, we cannot say the evidence overwhelmingly established defendant’s guilt for possession of a stolen motor vehicle.

Petition of KM

210 Ill. Dec. 693 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 18, 1995

s—does not establish standing under the Act to petition for adoption. … The Act clearly states that it " shall be liberally construed." (Emphasis added.) (750 ILCS 50/20 (West 1994).)

Eagle Trust Fund v. Miller

2022 IL App (5th) 210156-U · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 8, 2022

Near the end of Schlafly’s life, her children began to battle over the direction and control of entities that she established. This lawsuit involves one of those battles. … opposing counsel ordered workers to remove mold-containing barriers, required their experts to alter their opinions, and concealed evidence, the litigation privilege applied because all of the alleged improper conduct clearly

Chiricosta Ex Rel. Chiricosta v. Winthrop-Breon

263 Ill. App. 3d 132 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 27, 1994

In sum, we find that the plaintiff has failed to establish any reversible error through violations of in limine orders. … It is our view that the instruction should not be given where expert witnesses are not called unless adverse parties clearly show that they are entitled to the instruction.

BMO Bank N.A. v. Zbroszczyk

2025 IL App (1st) 241333 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 18, 2025

Additionally, a cause of action should not be dismissed under section 2-619 unless it is clearly apparent that no set of facts can be proved that would entitle the plaintiff to relief. Feltmeier v. … Similarly, where parol evidence is required, a written document does not qualify as “other evidences of indebtedness” under section 13-206 of the Code. Toth v. Mansell, 207 Ill.

Fitzpatrick v. a C F Properties Group, Inc.

231 Ill. App. 3d 690 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 2, 1992

A trial court has broad discretion in determining if a witness has been qualified as an expert. Taylor, 107 Ill. App. 2d at 19 . … Here, although plaintiff did not do so in a fact-specific manner, she clearly raised the issue in her post-trial motion.

Wade v. Rich

249 Ill. App. 3d 581 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 17, 1993

The viciousness of the dog's attack on plaintiff, which was out of proportion to the unintentional act committed by plaintiff, clearly establishes the defendants' liability for plaintiffs damages. … Instead, we think that liability was clearly established and that the verdict on the issue of liability is amply supported by the evidence.