Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.41s
2022 IL App (1st) 211242-U · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 27, 2022
Oglesby, 2016 IL App (1st) 141477, ¶ 242 (stating that the appellate court is entitled to clearly defined issues and cohesive arguments). ¶ 20 For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the trial court’s judgment. … ¶ 22 JUSTICE PUCINSKI, dissenting: ¶ 23 Where a man’s liberty interest is at stake the least the state could do is get a qualified exhibit entered as evidence or person to testify that the defendant did not possess
Cited 2 timesUnpublished2011 IL App (4th) 80120 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 30, 2011
Having found error, we next determine whether the error qualifies as one justifying plain-error review. … However, we find that, contrary to defendant's assertions, the evidence at trial clearly established defendant's guilt.
Cited 0 timesPublished143 Ill. App. 3d 11 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 13, 1986
In the instant case, clearly the questions put to defendant on cross-examination were within the scope of his direct examination. … These comments clearly support the State’s argument that the court only considered the photographs for impeachment purposes.
Cited 8 timesPublishedPeople Ex Rel. Hanrahan v. Village of Wheeling
42 Ill. App. 3d 825 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 28, 1976
Under the intervention principle established by People v. … In the interim its board has levied and collected taxes for the years 1967 and 1968 and has expended these monies to establish the Lincoln Land Junior College.
Cited 29 timesPublishedHolland v. Schwan's Home Service, Inc.
992 N.E.2d 43 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 30, 2013
His refusal to do so, Schwan’s argues, established his voluntary resignation from employment as a matter of law. … “The burden is on the party seeking reversal to establish prejudice.” Id.
Cited 66 timesPublished48 Ill. App. 3d 572 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 2, 1977
App. 3d 1076 , 335 N.E.2d 524 , is clearly misplaced. In Large, a collateral attack on a tax deed order failed. … However, we find that appellant does not qualify as a bona fide purchaser for purposes of applying the above rule. The.relevant facts as set forth in appellant’s petition for a rule to show cause are as follows.
Cited 5 timesPublishedUDI No. 2 v. The Department of Public Health
970 N.E.2d 585 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 12, 2012
Notify the House Manager, [qualified mental retardation professional (QMRP)], or Administrator for consultation and direction. C. … The Department found the DSP not qualified to perform a medical evaluation or injury determination.
Cited 3 timesPublished210 Ill. Dec. 599 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 26, 1995
Williams established that Clyde was 1 of 15 employees who provided home delivery of the Sun-Times newspaper. … Or, as Rule 804(b)(3) requires, "corroborating circumstances clearly indicate the trustworthiness of the statement.”
Cited 5 timesPublished2020 IL App (4th) 180681-U · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 23, 2020
Defendant claims the evidence did not establish he communicated a threat to F.N. or intended to coerce F.N. to perform a sex act. … When presented with a defendant’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, we apply the well-established, two-part Strickland test.
Cited 2 timesUnpublishedPekin Insurance Co. v. Rydzewski
2025 IL App (3d) 240358-U · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 4, 2025
In that context, Graunke’s interests were clearly opposed to the Estate’s interests. Thus, by any measure, Graunke lacks standing to invoke the Act. … Here, the evidence conclusively establishes Michelle and Lawrence were residing in separate households at the time of the accident.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished371 Ill. App. 3d 701 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 2, 2007
K.O. told him of two occasions, but he could only clearly recount one occurrence. K.O. told him: “ ‘I was in the basement from [sic] the house. And he puts me on top of the bed. … Other than establishing the fact that K.O. had a “Tio Jimmy,” defense counsel asked a total of five questions about defendant.
Cited 9 timesPublishedHynes v. Department of Revenue
207 Ill. Dec. 131 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 31, 1995
However, since we clearly have no jurisdiction to review the court’s orders relating to the 1988 claims, we need not belabor the point. … Surely, this fact alone establishes that Kozloff has no applicability to the order sub judice.
Cited 10 timesPublishedWabash County v. Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
408 Ill. App. 3d 924 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 28, 2011
Carmel is a municipality established pursuant to the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/1—1—1 et seq. (West 2008)) and is a participating municipality in the IMRF pension program. … Defendants counter that the Review Law mandates that the IMRF’s decision should be afforded significant deference and be reversed only if that decision was clearly erroneous.
Cited 24 timesPublished58 Ill. App. 2d 372 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 26, 1965
to procure insurance was not qualified. … In my opinion, the written documents clearly state that the remittance of the full down payment of $35.40 and delivery of a binder or a policy were conditions precedent to the agent's obligation under his contract to obtain
Cited 72 timesPublished993 N.E.2d 25 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 18, 2013
His situation essentially was that he was not board-eligible because he did not have full admitting staff privileges at a qualified hospital. … The circuit court’s order clearly reflects careful consideration of all of these factors, and we cannot say the court either abused its discretion or ruled contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. ¶
Cited 3 timesPublishedDavis v. Keystone Printing Service, Inc.
155 Ill. App. 3d 309 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 7, 1987
More importantly, failure to investigate does not in itself establish bad faith. (St. Amant v. Thompson (1968), 390 U.S. 727, 731-32 , 20 L. Ed. 2d 262, 267 , 88 S. Ct. 1323, 1326 .) … Defendants now try to justify their failure to investigate by claiming Drell was not qualified to review the books and because she could not be sure that the figures in the books would be accurate.
Cited 12 timesPublished59 N.E.3d 27 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 22, 2016
been denied, was clearly apparent. … Beck testified under immunity from prosecution that with Rezko’s support and a $1,000 donation to Blagojevich’s campaign fund, he was appointed chairman of the Board.
Cited 1 timesUnpublishedChicago Transit Authority v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 308
108 N.E.3d 285 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 15, 2018
Furthermore, by requiring the FTTFs qualified to operate trains to pick 32 hours of motor runs per week, the CTA had infringed on a contractually protected right that “picking” was to be done by seniority. … However, a court will vacate the award if it is repugnant to the established norms of public policy. [Citation.]
Cited 1 timesUnpublished267 Ill. App. 148 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 28, 1932
suit or proceeding without previous authority or appointment of the court, and while it is true that under our statutes the only person authorized to receive or take charge of the property or estate of a minor is the legal qualified … A court of review should be slow in disturbing the conclusions of a master upon the facts unless it can be said that his conclusions are clearly contrary to the probative force of the evidence. (Union Colliery Co. v.
Cited 5 timesPublished2016 IL App (3d) 140591 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 6, 2016
Defendant’s left arm was raised, but his right arm was not clearly visible. Poynter testified that defendant “continued to reach down towards the floorboard.” Poynter holstered his gun and drew his Taser. … Unless the petitioner’s allegations are affirmatively refuted by the record, they are taken as true, and the question is whether those allegations establish or ‘show’ a constitutional violation
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna