Case law

People v. Georgakapoulos

303 Ill. App. 3d 1001 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 16, 1999

In the instant case, the defendant argues that the evidence did not establish that Jacob sufficiently possessed his mental faculties. … Evidence of juvenile adjudications of a witness, including the defendant, is clearly admissible for the purpose of showing motive or bias. People v. Sharrod, 271 Ill. App. 3d 684, 689 , 648 N.E.2d 1141, 1144 (1995).

People v. Hood

Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 3, 2003

Hindman to be qualified as an expert toxicologist. … Expert Qualifications Defendant argues the State failed to establish Dr. Hindman as an expert on reverse extrapolation. We find defen­dant has forfeited this argument on appeal.

Haizen v. Yellow Cab Co.

41 Ill. App. 2d 330 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 13, 1963

I should think, rather, that reversal of a liability verdict on the basis of the evidence would require us to find that the manifest weight of all the evidence clearly established that there was no liability. … Gordon, 37 Ill App2d 41, 44, 184 NE2d 805 : “(S)ince a result contrary to the verdict is not clearly evident, it cannot properly be set aside by this court. (Romines v.

People v. Brown

255 Ill. App. 3d 425 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 12, 1993

It clearly did not find the other crime evidence persuasive on the issue of intent. … Accordingly, defendant has failed to establish that he received ineffective assistance of counsel.

In re Marriage of Larocque

2018 IL App (2d) 160973 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 26, 2018

She knew that John had established a qualified personal residence trust, but she was not aware that either she or John had established or funded any other trusts. … To the extent that Janet’s arguments reflect a broader concern that spouses can in all cases transfer assets with complete immunity, her concern is misplaced.

People v. Bochenek

2020 IL App (2d) 170545 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 10, 2020

Id. ¶ 60 Here, the other-crimes evidence was clearly probative as to defendant’s intent and lack of mistake. … In addition, the evidence was also so similar as to qualify as modus operandi evidence even if identity was not in issue. See People v. Boyd, 366 Ill.

In re Commitment of Hale

2025 IL App (1st) 231931-U · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 30, 2025

The prosecutor stated that, considering the State’s evidence, she thought the State had clearly proven the second criteria, to which respondent did not object. … Logan, 2024 IL 129054, ¶ 71), establishes that the evidence proving that respondent is an SVP was overwhelming and not closely balanced.

People v. Anderson

294 Ill. App. 109 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 11, 1938

Sherwin, 353 Ill. 525 ,) we have said: ‘It has long been established by the decisions of this and of other courts that a criminal contempt which is direct in its nature — i. e., which takes place in the very presence of the … The case before us clearly falls within the first part of the rule in which the contempt is committed in the very face of the court.

People v. White

963 N.E.2d 994 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 23, 2011

He saw "two other people in the seats behind the driver seat" that he did not see them clearly. … Here, the evidence clearly establishes that defendants were armed when they committed the charged offenses, as required by the sentencing statute.

People v. Patterson

428 Ill. Dec. 599 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 14, 2018

¶ 24 Due process requires that the proscriptions of a criminal statute be clearly defined. City of Chicago v. Morales, 177 Ill. 2d 440, 448 (1997). … The presence of the limiting language in the recidivist provisions of the Unified Code of Corrections and the absence of that language in the AHC statute establishes that defendant’s claim has no arguable basis in the law

Perry v. Nevin Hotel Co.

349 Ill. App. 22 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 23, 1953

It is well established that a corporation which, under such circumstances, takes the benefits of a contract may be held to have adopted and assumed also its obligations.” … This court believes that the facts proved in this case bring it clearly within the Supreme Court’s decision in White v.

People v. Harris

2014 IL App (2d) 120990 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 14, 2014

. ¶4 The relevant evidence at defendant’s bench trial established the following. … Heider, 231 Ill. 2d 1, 18 (2008) (finding no forfeiture “where the trial court clearly had an opportunity to review the same essential claim that was later raised on appeal”). ¶ 20 We turn now to the

People v. W.D.

194 Ill. App. 3d 686 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 16, 1990

W.D., a 16-year-old respondent charged with violating two State criminal statutes, clearly falls within this definition. … Furthermore, it is well established that where a conversation is related by a witness, the opposing party has a right to bring out all of the conversation on cross-examination. (People v.

People v. Valdez

37 N.E.3d 837 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 19, 2015

Therefore, his conviction did not qualify as an aggravated felony. ¶ 19 B. … Therefore, because the relevant case law clearly establishes that the offense to which the defendant pled guilty in this case was a deportable "crime involving moral turpitude" under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(

Karsten v. McCray

157 Ill. App. 3d 1 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 26, 1987

Over plaintiffs’ objection, defendants were allowed to tender an instruction which provided that the proper standard of care for the defendants in this case was that standard which is practiced by well-qualified specialists … Stat. 1985, ch. 110, par. 8— 802:) Petrillo does not clearly change existing law. We believe that Drs. Menet and Dominguez should have been barred from testifying at the initial trial of this cause.

McCullough v. Knight

293 Ill. App. 3d 591 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 27, 1998

The city cites several Supreme Court cases that trace the evolution of the exclusionary rule under the fourth amendment and establish the appropriate framework for analyzing this issue. … See Immunization & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-Mendoza, 468 U.S. 1032 , 104 S.Ct. 3479 , 82 L.Ed.2d 778 (1984); Leon, 468 U.S. 897 , 104 S.Ct. 3405 , 82 L.Ed.2d 677 ; United States v.

First Chicago Insurance Company v. Molda

2015 IL App (1st) 140548 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 21, 2015

Despite First Chicago’s contention that the last sentence of the definition “clearly limits” the category to only those vehicles owned by the employee or member of his or her household, the last sentence … . ¶ 50 We agree with the trial court that Molda qualifies as an insured under paragraph (c).

Lawrence v. Board of Education of School District 189

152 Ill. App. 3d 187 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 5, 1987

In order to qualify for this severance pay it was necessary for the teacher to meet certain conditions. … The defendant offered no evidence conclusively establishing that plaintiff was required to file a grievance and no evidence that his failure to do so was not excused.

Midwest Emergency Associates-Elgin Ltd.

Appellate Court of Illinois · May 15, 2008

Medicaid beneficiaries are required to seek medical treatment from approved providers within their MCO's established network(s). … Under these MCO agreements, Harmony Health is required to establish provider networks for its Medicaid enrollees.

Federal Insurance v. Binney & Smith, Inc.

393 Ill. App. 3d 277 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 30, 2009

Specifically, Federal contends Binney was unable to establish it settled an otherwise covered loss in reasonable anticipation of personal liability. … The supreme court noted Jackson and Lanier did not “ ‘confer a blanket immunization’ from Consumer Fraud Act liability.” Price, 219 Ill. 2d at 249 , quoting Jackson, 197 Ill. 2d at 51-52 .