Case law

People v. Carmen D.

352 Ill. App. 3d 967 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 21, 2004

Lastly, the assessment and report were clearly inadequate. … In this regard, the guardian maintains that the Report in fact did not contain expert opinions because none of the authors were qualified as experts. The State again presents arguments similar to the guardian’s.

Chief Judge of the Circuit Court of Cook County v. American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees, Council 31

218 Ill. App. 3d 682 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 16, 1991

An administrative decision should be reversed only where the opposite conclusion is clearly evident. Madonia v. Houston (1984), 125 Ill. App. 3d 713 , 466 N.E.2d 648 . … This court has held that State employees must also meet the “preponderance of time” requirement to qualify for supervisory status under the Act.

In Re Marriage of Mehring

324 Ill. App. 3d 262 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 13, 2001

E.g., 410 ILCS 315/2 (West 2000) (requiring immunization of all children for diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus); 410 ILCS 205/1 et seq. (West 2000) (requiring children to receive hearing and visual examinations). … For example, under subsection (C) the parent is dead and is clearly unable to assist the grandparents.

Ivetic v. Bensenville Fire Protection District No. 2

2023 IL App (1st) 220879 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 22, 2023

The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment as to whether James qualified for the benefits under the Act. … In other words, the line-of-duty disability pension conclusively established that James suffered a “catastrophic injury” as a matter of law.

People v. Clay

124 Ill. App. 3d 140 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 4, 1984

The absence of any qualifying language in section 5 — 5—3.2 leads us to the conclusion that no such proscription was intended. … App. 3d 916 , to which defendant compares this case, is clearly distinguishable.

Corbin v. Schroeder

2021 IL App (2d) 210090-U · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 8, 2021

The board’s determination on a mixed question of law and fact will not be disturbed on review unless it is clearly erroneous. Id. at 211. … ¶ 22 We also note that, although not his burden, Khokhar did apparently obtain affidavits to establish validity for some of the challenged signatures.

People v. Eckles

83 Ill. App. 3d 292 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 11, 1980

Nor does defendant’s argument that his expert witness was more qualified than the State’s expert witness raise a reasonable doubt of sanity, where the testimony conflicts. People v. Rennert (1977), 49 Ill. … The trial court is, therefore, in a better position than a reviewing court to determine the prejudicial effect, if any, of a remark made during argument, and unless clearly an abuse of discretion, its ruling should be upheld

Estate of Strocchia v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 1, 1996

(emphasis added) Thus, although plaintiff argues to the contrary, plaintiff's retaliatory discharge claim is clearly premised upon a theory of constructive discharge. … The evidence established that plaintiff was approved for reinstatement at full seniority and the highest pay scale, that an agreed start date was established which accommodated plaintiff's vacation, that plaintiff failed

In Re EG

161 Ill. App. 3d 765 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 23, 1987

The majority fails to mention these well-established policies and duties of the court. … The minor, then, was clearly willing to comply with the court order.

Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Cohen

284 Ill. App. 181 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 2, 1936

The language of the guaranty as set up in the declaration is clearly to the contrary. … The covenant for the payment of the deficiency provides, “. . . but this covenant shall not limit or qualify the other remedies which may be pursued under this guaranty.”

Lawrence v. Board of Education of School District 189

152 Ill. App. 3d 187 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 5, 1987

In order to qualify for this severance pay it was necessary for the teacher to meet certain conditions. … The defendant offered no evidence conclusively establishing that plaintiff was required to file a grievance and no evidence that his failure to do so was not excused.

People v. Georgakapoulos

303 Ill. App. 3d 1001 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 16, 1999

In the instant case, the defendant argues that the evidence did not establish that Jacob sufficiently possessed his mental faculties. … Evidence of juvenile adjudications of a witness, including the defendant, is clearly admissible for the purpose of showing motive or bias. People v. Sharrod, 271 Ill. App. 3d 684, 689 , 648 N.E.2d 1141, 1144 (1995).

Morales v. Herrera

68 N.E.3d 930 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 7, 2016

Furthermore, section 5(a) renders coemployees immune from a common law negligence action. Ramsey v. Morrison, 175 Ill. 2d 218, 224 (1997). … ¶ 31 The record also clearly shows that plaintiffs had an implied contract for hire with Radio.

People v. Hood

Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 3, 2003

Hindman to be qualified as an expert toxicologist. … Expert Qualifications Defendant argues the State failed to establish Dr. Hindman as an expert on reverse extrapolation. We find defen­dant has forfeited this argument on appeal.

People v. Thurman

169 Ill. App. 3d 996 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 9, 1988

If this evidence is believed, it is clearly sufficient to establish the identity of the assailant. … The evidence identifying the defendant as the assailant was sufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Karsten v. McCray

157 Ill. App. 3d 1 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 26, 1987

Over plaintiffs’ objection, defendants were allowed to tender an instruction which provided that the proper standard of care for the defendants in this case was that standard which is practiced by well-qualified specialists … Stat. 1985, ch. 110, par. 8— 802:) Petrillo does not clearly change existing law. We believe that Drs. Menet and Dominguez should have been barred from testifying at the initial trial of this cause.

People v. W.D.

194 Ill. App. 3d 686 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 16, 1990

W.D., a 16-year-old respondent charged with violating two State criminal statutes, clearly falls within this definition. … Furthermore, it is well established that where a conversation is related by a witness, the opposing party has a right to bring out all of the conversation on cross-examination. (People v.

People v. Brown

255 Ill. App. 3d 425 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 12, 1993

It clearly did not find the other crime evidence persuasive on the issue of intent. … Accordingly, defendant has failed to establish that he received ineffective assistance of counsel.

In re Marriage of Levy

2022 IL App (2d) 210527-U · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 29, 2022

Each of those businesses was established for the development and sale of a Wendy’s restaurant in Chicago. … [Respondent] was the wage earner who has [sic] and still has the higher income earning potential as clearly displayed on his past earnings.

First Chicago Insurance Company v. Molda

2015 IL App (1st) 140548 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 21, 2015

Despite First Chicago’s contention that the last sentence of the definition “clearly limits” the category to only those vehicles owned by the employee or member of his or her household, the last sentence … . ¶ 50 We agree with the trial court that Molda qualifies as an insured under paragraph (c).