Case law

People v. Korzenewski

2012 IL App (4th) 101026 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 7, 2012

In doing so, the question becomes whether a routine traffic stop for speeding qualifies as “an appropriate emergency response.” … This result was clearly not intended by the legislature. Accordingly, we vacate the $133 restitution order. See People v.

Morris v. Ameritech Illinois

337 Ill. App. 3d 40 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 21, 2003

The court held that General Electric, the defendant, did not qualify as a principal under the Code because the defendant did not knowingly employ the supervisor to tape the conversation. … In general, where a statute applies to an area formerly covered by the common law, we interpret the statute as adopting the common law unless the General Assembly clearly and specifically expressed an intention to change

People v. Bonnette

2025 IL App (4th) 240827 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 16, 2025

The court also believed that defendant “clearly used search terms that result in images such as these being located.” … Accordingly, “possession may be established by either proof of actual and knowing physical possession or constructive possession.” Josephitis, 394 Ill. App. 3d at 299.

Chas. Ind Co. v. Cecil B. Wood, Inc.

56 Ill. App. 2d 30 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 9, 1965

Thus, Illinois practice and procedure, as well as substantive law, contemplates broad appeal rights in persons qualified to appeal. … Ind, in conducting its defense, actively sought to establish tbe negligence of Wood and its freedom from negligence.

Crain v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 14, 2000

In furtherance of this goal, the FCC issued an implementation order that imposed some restrictions and established some requirements on the telephone companies for a period of two years. … The FCC clearly intended to sever the sales and leasing of CPE from the transmission services offered by telephone carriers in order to open the CPE market to competition.

People v. Frazier

62 N.E.3d 1081 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 15, 2016

¶ 19 Here, the evidence established that defendant possessed Hard’s stolen 2011 Lingyu 13L150 motor scooter. … The above testimony clearly shows that defendant was in possession of Hard’s motor scooter, which had been stolen.

Harris Bank of Roselle v. Village of Mettawa

243 Ill. App. 3d 103 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 22, 1993

Defendant asserts that prohibiting the treatment of sanitary sewerage and/or sanitary wastewater by means of irrigation relates to matters of public health and thereby qualifies as a “health and quarantine” regulation. … When municipal residents are threatened by a health hazard existing outside municipal borders, the municipality clearly has an incentive to act”).

Naprawa v. Chicago Flat Janitors' Union

315 Ill. App. 328 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 24, 1942

It is well established that peaceful picketing in labor disputes is lawful. … John Naprawa1 clearly had the right to perform the janitor work.

Tharp v. Critton

135 Ill. App. 3d 796 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 13, 1985

Law Of The Case Petitioner asserts she proved her entitlement to the indemnity to the first trial court and that this court agreed, thereby establishing the law of the case on point one of the two-pronged tests; i.e., “the … During the time involved, she was able to carry on her professional work responsibly and capably, and her status does not qualify her for relief.

Whitney v. Whitney

15 Ill. App. 2d 425 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 2, 1958

The decree makes no mention of the stipulation or any of its qualifying provisions. Accordingly we hold that the decree must be controlling, regardless of any stipulation. … Most of the confusion in those cases has resulted from a loose application of these terms and the intention of the parties has not been clearly established by the order or decree.”

Ridings v. Hynds

154 Ill. App. 429 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 11, 1910

Quigley, two of her children, qualified as executors thereof.) … On July 22, 1905, he addressed a letter to the bank that read in part: “You do not seem to be aware of the fact that at the time this instrument was given on my mother’s farm to secure some of my indebtedness it was clearly

W.W. Vincent & Co. v. First Colony Life Insurance

351 Ill. App. 3d 752 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 11, 2004

A cause of action should be dismissed pursuant to a section 2 — 615 motion only if it is clearly apparent that no set of facts can be proven which will entitle the plaintiff to recovery. Borowiec, 209 111. 2d at 382-83. … A statement that is technically true may nevertheless be fraudulent where it omits qualifying material since a “half-truth” is sometimes more misleading than an outright lie. Perlman, 64 Ill.

Seiders v. Henry

259 Ill. App. 427 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 22, 1930

Defendant held all the shares except two, which were held by a brother and sister respectively, who thus qualified as directors of the corporation and who, together with defendant, constituted the board of directors. … The evidence of these witnesses on this point is uncontradicted in the record, and the facts must therefore be regarded as established.

People v. Jayne

52 Ill. App. 3d 990 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 2, 1977

At trial, the State called Melvin Adams, an accomplice to the murder who had been granted immunity from prosecution. … Thereafter, in rebuttal, the People called John Stryker and qualified him as an expert in the science of image interpretation of aerial photographs.

Schwartz v. Great Central Insurance

188 Ill. App. 3d 264 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 20, 1989

Plaintiff also notes that subsequent to incorporation she paid the premiums with a business check which clearly notes the name of the business as “Schwartz’s Dress and Bridal Shop, Inc.” … Plaintiff would have us wholly disregard defendant’s answer on grounds that defendant’s pleading is insufficient and does not qualify as a verified pleading.

Citizens Utility Board v. Illinois Commerce Commission

275 Ill. App. 3d 329 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 25, 1995

In order to qualify for Rate CS, these customers would have to file a written application with Edison as well as an affidavit stating the customer’s intent to bypass Edison’s system. … Clearly, both the filing of the proprietary contracts "for informational purposes” and the failure to keep the same open for public inspection contravene the language of the Act.

Staes and Scallan, P.C. v. Orlich

981 N.E.2d 38 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 6, 2012

Staes had informed him that he was qualified to have the case removed and explained how long it would take. He admitted that Staes told him his billing rate was $400 an hour. … The court found further that Orlich clearly accepted many of the charges from both Staes and Scallan.

People v. Glanton

33 Ill. App. 3d 124 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 21, 1975

Through the testimony of Burt Neilson (whom the State qualified as a ballistics expert) and of evidence technicians Gunnell and Koludrovic, tire State next established the chain of possession of bullets, bullet pieces, and … We conclude that the evidence at the trial clearly established the existence of probable cause to arrest each of the three defendants.

Illinois-Iowa Blacktop, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

180 Ill. App. 3d 885 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 7, 1989

Clearly, Senator Bruce’s statement concerns only part-time employees who are regularly not paid on a full 40-hour week basis, but are paid for a regular number of hours less than 40. … It is worth noting that the instant petitioner would have qualified as a seasonal worker under old section 10(e). See Rambert v. Industrial Comm’n (1985), 133 Ill. App. 3d 895 , 477 N.E.2d 1364 ; Reynolds v.

Elward v. Peabody Coal Co.

9 Ill. App. 2d 234 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 21, 1956

Plaintiff asserts that the stock option must fail because it is not upon terms and conditions approved by a qualified majority of the directors. … Plaintiff argues that of the three directors, two others could be fairly regarded as interested and dominating, leaving only one clearly disinterested director.