Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersillappct

10,000+ results

1.65s

  • People v. Keen

    206 Ill. App. 3d 940 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 30, 1990

    Defendant is, in effect, asking this court to assume a fact that has not been established. … Kawoleski (1924), 313 Ill. 257 , 145 N.E. 203 , which is clearly distinguishable.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • People v. Thornton

    446 Ill. Dec. 297 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 31, 2020

    D.P. was unable to identify her attacker from that array, while S.F. identified an individual who was clearly not defendant since his photo was not part of the array. ¶6 As discussed in more depth later, during … California, 572 U.S. 393, 400 (2014) (noting a 911 call has features that allow for identifying and tracing callers and thus provides for safeguards against “making false reports with immunity”); 720 ILCS 5/

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • People v. Ikpoh

    242 Ill. App. 3d 365 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 4, 1993

    Julia was there for an immunization she needed for high school. Mrs. Rodenkirch, who also testified, explained that Julia’s appointment was for 12:15. … The defendant argues that the testimony of his four physician witnesses established that the sex organs of a female are limited to the uterus, fallopian tubes, and vagina.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • City of Rockford v. Pollution Control Board

    125 Ill. App. 3d 384 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 27, 1984

    ecologically sound regional pollution control facilities to ease the recognized difficulty of disposing of refuse and to establish a unified statewide program for environmental protection. … The manifest weight of the evidence indicates that a contrary result from that reached by Rockford is clearly evident. (See Jenkins v. Universities Civil Service Merit Board (1982), 106 Ill. App. 3d 215, 219 .)

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Camillo v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

    221 Ill. App. 3d 614 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 25, 1991

    The assistant manager or Phase II trainee must be hired or promoted by November 1st each year to qualify for any bonus. … However, the bonus in question is clearly compensation to which defendant was entitled to a pro rata share.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • City of Collinsville v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board

    Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 9, 2002

    The City violated Section[s] 10(a)(4) and [(a)](1) of the Act when it unilaterally discontinued the established transfer procedure." … . 2d 496, 523 , 599 N.E.2d 892, 905 (1992), the Illinois Supreme Court stated that the question whether a matter concerns "wages, hours[,] and terms and conditions of employment" is a question that the Board is uniquely qualified

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. Graham

    Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 13, 2001

    Thus, the Purtill court held that an expert will be qualified to testify as to the standard of care in a medical malpractice case if (1) the expert is familiar with the standards of care applicable to a reasonably well-qualified … In order to achieve this recognition, it had to be nationally qualified, have facilities approved by a national review group, and have nationally qualified personnel.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Englewood Hospital Ass'n v. Knox

    49 Ill. App. 3d 515 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 3, 1977

    Clearly, the wages or earned income of a recipient are not within the money payments made by IDPA pursuant to article IV. … Thus, it was her initial burden in the trial court to establish that IDPA was required to increase her assistance when the wage deduction was made.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Midwest Generation, LLC v. Illinois Pollution Control Board

    2024 IL App (4th) 210304 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 14, 2024

    Accordingly, a dry surface impoundment that was designed to hold liquid but no longer holds liquid first qualifies as a “CCR surface impoundment” by virtue of its design and next qualifies as an “inactive CCR surface impoundment … The legislature clearly expressed its intent through the plain language it utilized in the Act.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. J.S.

    121 Ill. App. 3d 927 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 10, 1984

    Alen Ravitz, a psychiatrist, testified that prior to the appearance of a translator on February 9, 1982, he had a clinical interview in English with the respondent, and concluded that respondent did not clearly understand … Zepeda (1970), 47 Ill. 2d 23, 27 , 265 N.E.2d 647 ), as the act does not make juveniles immune from proper police investigation. 47 111. 2d 23, 28.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Turner-El v. West

    285 Ill. Dec. 241 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 27, 2004

    courts, and that he had failed to establish a clear right to have his grievances heard. … That debt is clearly uncollectible, now or in the future.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Muhammad v. First Pacific Bank

    165 Ill. App. 3d 890 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 31, 1987

    The case at bar is clearly distinguishable from the Katz decision. … It is well established that contributions to an individual, “no matter how worthy,” do not qualify for a charitable deduction. (Tripp v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (7th Cir. 1964), 337 F.2d 432, 436 .)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Taiym v. The Retirement Board of the Policemen's Aunnuity and Benefit Fund of the City of Chicago

    10 N.E.3d 267 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 28, 2014

    The documents established that from April 18, 1988 to August 15, 1990, Taiym was employed as a watchman for the Chicago department of streets and sanitation. … Therefore, Taiym's arguments fail and the Retirement Board was not clearly erroneous in finding that Taiym did not qualify for pension credit under section 5-214(c) of the Pension Code.

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • Housing Authority of the County of Lake v. Lake County Zoning Board of Appeals

    2017 IL App (2d) 160959 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 22, 2017

    and law, and the standard of review is “clearly erroneous.” … However, the Director determined that the project qualified as “government use (no assembly space),” and this is the decision the Board reviewed.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Wright v. County of Du Page

    316 Ill. App. 3d 28 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 13, 2000

    Following trial, the court found that the evidence clearly established that the purpose or activity for which the Spas were designed or intended or for which they were maintained and occupied constituted an adult use because … Clearly, the evidence established that the business use of the Spas’ establishments was for the operation of massage parlors that emphasized an activity distinguished and characterized by its emphasis on matters relating

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • People v. King

    2023 IL App (1st) 220916 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 31, 2023

    July 1, 2017) certificate and substantial compliance with the rule was not otherwise established by the record. … The petition must clearly set forth the respects in which the petitioner’s rights were violated. 725 ILCS 5/122-2 (West 2016).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • People v. Byrd

    139 Ill. App. 3d 859 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 10, 1986

    Indeed, were we so to rule, a suspect could, by refusing to sign and subsequently talking freely, enjoy the luxury of an immunity bath at no price at all." … There is nothing at all in the court's remarks to suggest that defendant was being punished for his refusal to admit guilt. *868 The court's remarks regarding defendant's refusal to admit guilt are well within the established

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Carlson Transport, Inc. v. Illinois Commerce Commission

    93 Ill. App. 3d 793 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 20, 1981

    This section provides, inter alia, that the Commission shall issue a permit to a qualified applicant: e [I]f it is found that the applicant is fit, willing and able properly to perform the service proposed and to conform … Illinois Commerce Com. (1960), 19 Ill. 2d 354 , 166 N.E.2d 18 , the finding involved merely stated that “sufficient evidence * * * was presented to establish proof for the need of the proposed service and the proposed service

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Buckholtz v. MacNeal Hospital

    337 Ill. App. 3d 163 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 31, 2003

    This court will not reverse a trial court’s ruling on a motion for a new trial except in those instances where it is affirmatively shown that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. … Katz testified that a reasonably well-qualified anesthesiologist or nurse anesthetist should have diagnosed Mr.

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • In Re Marriage of Goldman

    196 Ill. App. 3d 785 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 30, 1990

    The order specifically provided that it was not requiring the Beth Din to grant the get and that the court would not supervise the procedure, determine who was a qualified witness or review whether the Beth Din made a correct … Neither in the trial court nor in his brief on appeal has Kenneth clearly articulated in what manner the court order requiring him to obtain a get prevented the free exercise of his religion.

    Cited 16 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.