Case law

Knorst v. State Universities Civil Service System

325 Ill. App. 3d 858 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 4, 2001

We further note that counsel’s letter of February 20, 1995, certainly qualifies as a formal request for review of the action taken on January 3, 1995. … A review of the letter establishes counsel’s attempt to file a formal request for review as suggested by section 250.130(a).

Gottemoller v. Gottemoller

37 Ill. App. 3d 689 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 14, 1976

The down payment on the marital residence could qualify as a special contribution under section 17, if the premises were solely in the name of the defendant. … While it may also be inequitable for defendant to receive the chimes, candleholders and freezer, we find nothing in the record which establishes a sufficient basis for us to reverse the trial court as to these matters.

Alguire v. Walker

154 Ill. App. 3d 438 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 18, 1987

Alguire’s contention, that because he had dismantled the building “no one could be better qualified” to determine the building’s value, is untenable. … This action is clearly insufficient to support an award of punitive damages.

Quincy School District No. 172 v. Board of Review

129 Ill. App. 3d 93 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 30, 1984

The Act requires that a claimant demonstrate his search for work for which he is qualified during each week for which benefits are claimed. … We therefore conclude that this period falls ■within the meaning of section 500(C)(2) of the Act, as holidays according to the custom of the trade or occupation, and clearly distinguishable from a shutdown for inventory or

Tate v. Coonce

97 Ill. App. 3d 145 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 4, 1981

The requirement for pleading an indirect sale is set forth very clearly in Bell v. Poindexter (1949), 336 Ill. App. 541 , 84 N.E.2d 646 . … To suggest that the plaintiff would have to be qualified as an oral surgeon to testify that he has trouble keeping his lower plate in place is without merit.

Lidecker v. Kendall College

194 Ill. App. 3d 309 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 19, 1990

The evidence clearly shows, however, that plaintiffs were fully informed by Labunski during their sophomore year class in fall 1982. … In addition, Labunski testified that she had been assured by the deans of all Chicago-area master’s programs that a Kendall degree would not bar an otherwise qualified applicant from admission.

Bi-Lo Stations, Inc. v. Village of Alsip

22 Ill. App. 3d 514 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 3, 1974

Thus admitting the authority, under the proper exercise of the police power, to prescribe reasonable closing hours, the plaintiff says the qualifying conditions are absent here. … Having stated that the record here established a valid basis for the exercise of the police power, and there being nothing in the record to establish that the closing hours are arbitrary or unreasonable, we find no reason

City of Collinsville v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board

329 Ill. App. 3d 409 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 9, 2002

established transfer procedure!,] in violation of Section[s] 10(a)(4) and [(a)](l) of the Act. 4. … The City violated Section[s] 10(a)(4) and [(a)](l) of the Act when it unilaterally discontinued the established transfer procedure.”

Horak v. Biris

130 Ill. App. 3d 140 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 23, 1985

obtained significant information from plaintiff’s wife about the personal profile of plaintiff and the Horak’s marital relationship; (4) upon defendant’s request and relying upon defendant’s reputation in the community as a qualified … To this extent, any malpractice committed by the defendant in the treatment of plaintiff’s wife would clearly have an impact upon the plaintiff as well. See Anclote Manor Foundation v. Wilkinson (Fla.

People v. Lewis

334 Ill. App. 3d 993 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 8, 2002

The clearly savage beating of a child which resulted in an innocent and defenseless child’s death. … Defendant argues the evidence failed to establish this factor.

Jackson v. Village of Caseyville

214 Ill. App. 3d 1058 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 15, 1990

This court finds that plaintiff was qualified as an expert because of his nearly 40 years of farming experience on the lands in question and with the crops grown. Kaiser Agricultural Chemicals v. Rice (1985), 138 Ill. … Contrasted with this brief testimony is plaintiff’s exhibit 14, the judgment order on the foreclosure suit that clearly indicates that the interest expense was incurred as a result of the 1977 mortgage note.

Owen v. Village of Maywood

235 N.E.3d 1198 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 26, 2023

Further, the language “where applicable” in relation to family medical insurance clearly refers to the applicable status at the time of the certification. … Specifically, plaintiff contends that the difference between the single and family health insurance premiums qualified as wages due under the Wage Payment Act (820 ILCS 115/2 (West 2018)), and additionally

Amato v. Greenquist

287 Ill. App. 3d 921 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 16, 1997

from their ambit, so long as they do not hold themselves out as qualified under the acts. … First, we believe that the allegations clearly indicate that the plaintiff approached the bishop within the context of his duties as the head of the church. As such, the claim is clearly nonjusticiable.

Handley v. Unarco Industries, Inc.

124 Ill. App. 3d 56 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 9, 1984

Because this is a drastic measure, however, it is to be granted only where the evidence, when construed most strongly against the moving party, establishes clearly and without doubt his right thereto. … Although there are no disputed issues of fact in this case, we conclude that the defendants have not clearly established their right to summary judgment.

People v. Williams

85 Ill. App. 3d 850 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 10, 1980

At trial, he was qualified and accepted as an expert in his field which he stated involved the examination of physical evidence. … This witness had been qualified and accepted as an expert in the field of forensic pathology which he stated included the detection of powder bums on a victim’s skin.

People v. Borys

2013 IL App (1st) 111629 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 17, 2013

Reynaldo Paras was qualified as an expert in the field of medicine and testified that defendant was his patient. … Bew, 228 Ill. 2d 122, 128-29 (2008). ¶ 33 Defendant argues there was a reasonable probability that a motion to suppress Price’s testimony would have been granted because (1) he clearly failed to comply with

Koulegeorge v. State of Illinois Human Rights Comm'n

Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 29, 2000

It would be unnecessary to require a respondent to present testimony or other evidence where a petitioner has clearly failed to meet its initial burden of establishing a prima facie case, as more fully discussed below regarding … The ALJ clearly applied the correct standard in considering the evidence presented by petitioner.

Drenckpohl v. Barker

253 Ill. App. 3d 203 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 12, 1993

We cannot conclude that Velma Drenckpohl’s retention of possession of the certificates of deposit established her lack of do-native intent. … The evidence must clearly and convincingly show that there was a lack of donative intent at that time. (In re Estate of Eiberger (1978), 60 Ill. App. 3d 790, 794 , 376 N.E.2d 793, 796 .)

In Re Marriage of Hunter

223 Ill. App. 3d 947 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 23, 1992

Powell clearly testified that the equipment of Hunter’s Welding in its current condition was worth no more than $17,000. … Here, the trial court’s valuation was well within the range established by the expert testimony, and its valuation was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Pederson v. Village of Hoffman Estates

2014 IL App (1st) 123402 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 21, 2014

application of collateral estoppel, the legislative intent that an injured firefighter or police officer to be eligible for benefits under section 10(a) of the Act “whenever his or her injuries were sufficient to qualify … Defendants’ decision to deny plaintiffs benefits under section 10 of the Act, however, was clearly erroneous, as Pedersen’s catastrophic injury occurred in response to what the record clearly established to