Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.89s
46 Ill. App. 234 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 11, 1892
Assuming, as both sides do, that the words “ in this State” are intended to refer to and qualify “ estates,” and do not refer to the place where the owner thereof may die intestate, they clearly refer to personal as well … it, except so far as the intention is clearly manifested.
Cited 2 timesPublished2026 IL App (2d) 250185 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 8, 2026
-4- ¶ 12 Defendant testified that he established his Twitter account for use with his T-shirt business. … As noted, they were written in the second person, and H.B. was clearly the person to whom defendant was writing.
Cited 0 timesPublished2018 IL App (1st) 180467 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 28, 2019
Coe was not qualified to offer an Markiewicz, 233 Ill. … Plaintiff’s counsel then stated the video is clearly not a video. This is a time lapse—there are shots taken out. It’s like a picture, a lapse, picture, a lapse, picture.”
Cited 5 timesPublished2011 IL App (1st) 93238 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 2, 2011
James Lee Qualifies as a “Merchant” ¶ 86 Defendant argues that the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that James Lee qualifies a “merchant” under section 16A-2.4. … For the reasons discussed below, we find that the evidence in the trial record was sufficient to establish that Lee was an “independent contractor” of the Family Dollar Store and therefore qualifies as a “merchant
Cited 0 timesPublished14 Ill. App. 3d 933 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 2, 1973
One of Hazdra’s principle contentions is that Cassidy was not qualified as an expert witness, and that he did not conduct tests at the Ondrak home. … The record clearly indicates that the court was interested only in the cost of removing and replacing the old roof.
Cited 1 timesPublishedAppellate Court of Illinois · Feb 7, 2003
If the legislature intended the statute to mean what respondent argues it means, the legislature could have easily said so by inserting a single but highly significant qualifying word: "paternal." … On its face, section 2-4(d)(1) does not "clearly require" us to hold that petitioners have no right of heirship from decedent.
Cited 0 timesPublished306 Ill. App. 3d 817 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 3, 1999
Respondent argues that, even if the report qualifies as a business record and a proper foundation is established, it is nevertheless inadmissible because its purpose was improper. … Initially, a review of the record clearly indicates that the report was not prepared in anticipation of future discipline.
Cited 2 timesPublished455 Ill. Dec. 544 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 1, 2021
Thus, the State was not required to provide evidence of the location of the offense in order to establish jurisdiction. Id. … The language provided by the respondent to refer to the State of Illinois with “State” clearly includes “this” before it to denote the legislature is discussing the State of Illinois.
Cited 2 timesPublished233 Ill. App. 3d 278 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 7, 1992
Our review of the record clearly indicates, however, that defense counsel never offered or argued the theories of admissibility at trial which defendant now makes on appeal. This issue has been waived. … Clearly, defense counsel was aware that his client had testified previously.
Cited 13 timesPublishedStone Street Partners, LLC v. The City of Chicago Department of Administrative Hearings
12 N.E.3d 691 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 20, 2014
Nonetheless, the 1999 order mentions nothing about default, and it was clearly entered after some sort of adjudication on the merits. … The City moved to dismiss the both because it was as time-barred and because section 2- 107 of the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act immunizes it from liability for libel and slander.
Cited 2 timesUnpublished2020 IL App (4th) 190018-U · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 13, 2020
As program director, it was defendant’s job to establish rules regulating the acquisition and possession of personal property by the residents and to enforce those rules. See 59 Ill. Adm. Code 299.330 (2000). … Thus, the complained-of actions clearly involved matters that were squarely within defendant’s normal, official functions.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished2018 IL App (3d) 170625 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 11, 2019
In interpreting the pension protection clause, our supreme court has stated that the clause means precisely what it says—if -4- something qualifies as … It is well established under Illinois law that an employee hired for an indefinite period of time may be terminated at will. See Duldulao v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedMiller v. Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago
Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 22, 2007
To establish title by adverse possession as provided by section 13-101 of the Limitations -2- No. 1-06-1230 Act, the party must possess the disputed land for 20 years. … App. 3d 750 (1990) (holding that parking lot did not fall qualify as a "public use" as defined by Brown.
Cited 0 timesPublished394 Ill. App. 3d 286 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 15, 2009
App. 3d at 266 (acknowledging that “a device may be in such a decrepit state that it ceases to qualify as a switchblade knife”). … A party challenging the constitutionality of a statute has the burden of clearly establishing its invalidity. Jones, 223 Ill. 2d at 596 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Martin v. White
329 Ill. App. 81 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 29, 1946
Ann. 43.799]) provides that an established political party may nominate candidates for village offices by caucus where the population is less than, 5,000.. Section 1-9 of th.e Cities and Villages Act (Ill. Rev. … Our democratic institutions are based on free elections, and our laws and traditions recognize the rights of persons who are qualified and who comply with statutory provisions to present themselves for public office.
Cited 8 timesPublishedKenneke v. First National Bank
105 Ill. App. 3d 630 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 31, 1982
It is not disputed that plaintiff Waszak did not qualify for pension benefits under the terms of the pension plan. … However, our prior decision was clearly based on the first amended complaint without an examination of the plan.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Trustees of the University of Illinois v. Illinois Labor Relations Board
Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 26, 2005
This is a fact-specific undertaking, for which the Board is "eminently qualified." See Central City , 149 Ill. 2d at 523 , 599 N.E.2d at 905 . … Such a determination was not "clearly erroneous" and should be affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIllinois State Chamber of Commerce v. Pollution Control Board
177 Ill. App. 3d 923 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 29, 1988
Because administrative agencies are inherently more qualified to decide technical problems, this court, when reviewing administrative rules and regulations, may not invalidate a regulation unless it is clearly arbitrary, … Clearly, the Board did state, as appellants point out, that the “CAA requires that RACT rules, including that proposed here, be in place by December 31, 1987.”
Cited 6 timesPublished68 Ill. App. 3d 428 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 18, 1979
This contraband was submitted and analyzed by qualified chemists of the Chicago Police Department and found to be narcotic substances on each of these occassions [sic]. … The stipulation at the hearing establishes that this was in fact the home of Julia Garcia.
Cited 17 timesPublished198 Ill. App. 3d 748 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 15, 1990
As defendant clearly could not be in two places at once, Woody’s proposed testimony constituted an alibi defense. (See People v. Fritz (1981), 84 Ill. 2d 72, 76-77 , 417 N.E.2d 612 .) … The unrebutted evidence establishes that defendant was convicted of armed bank robbery which was properly considered as a qualifying Class X offense for purposes of the habitual criminal statute.
Cited 8 timesPublished
Ask Donna