Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.43s
178 Ill. App. 3d 102 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 30, 1988
Count X alleged the conduct previously described as a proximate cause of plaintiff’s injury resulted from the City’s failure to establish adequate rules and regulations and provide adequate training for and supervision of … Clearly, the affirmative act of requiring officers to perform in an improper manner is more wrongful than not giving them guidelines which would attempt to keep them from improper conduct.
Cited 2 timesPublished194 Ill. App. 3d 547 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 28, 1990
While statements qualifying under this rule may also be admissible as a spontaneous declaration, statements by the victim as to what occurred, which are made at a time too remote to qualify as a spontaneous declaration, or … As the facts indicate, the instant case clearly hinged on the credibility of defendant and the victim.
Cited 5 timesPublished399 Ill. App. 3d 1169 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 13, 2010
A double enhancement is not improper if the legislature clearly expresses an intent to allow it. People v. Owens, 377 Ill. App. 3d 302, 304 , 878 N.E.2d 1189, 1191-92 (2007). … The State chose to do so by establishing defendant had a 1996 felony conviction under the Controlled Substances Act.
Cited 8 timesPublishedThompson v. Department of Human Services
2024 IL App (1st) 221002 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 2, 2024
On her voicemail, he left a message indicating that the case did not qualify for a reopen request and that a new application would have to be filed. … A finding is against the manifest weight only if the opposite conclusion is clearly evident. Parikh, 2014 IL App (1st) 123319, ¶ 28.
Cited 1 timesPublished109 N.E.3d 756 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 12, 2018
It is not clearly and beyond a reasonable doubt intended for the illegal use of a controlled substance. See 720 ILCS 600/6 (West 2016). … Otherwise, any item that a person used to consume drugs would, without more, qualify as drug paraphernalia, irrespective of the definition set forth in section 2(d).
Cited 2 timesPublished2025 IL App (2d) 240250 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 14, 2025
Granting credit against a sentence of imprisonment for time previously spent in institutional custody clearly serves that purpose; granting credit for time spent while released on bond, even with the restrictive … Confinement need not be 24 hours per day to qualify as home detention, and significant restrictions on liberty such as 7pm [sic] to 7am [sic] curfews shall qualify.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAppellate Court of Illinois · Sep 18, 2002
Additionally, we address an immunity issue raised by Robert in this appeal. … We find that the complaint clearly articulates a pattern of conduct that satisfies the standard necessary to state a cause of action for the intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJohnson v. Highland Elementary School
2020 IL App (2d) 190479-U · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 6, 2020
Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act (Tort Immunity Act) (745 ILCS 10/6-105 (West 2018)), which established immunity related to an alleged failure to understand, diagnose, and … App. 3d 19 (1984), in arguing that the lack of supervision qualified as willful and wanton.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedThompson v. Illinois Department of Human Services
2024 IL App (1st) 221002 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 27, 2024
On her voicemail, he left a message indicating that the case did not qualify for a reopen request and that a new application would have to be filed. … A finding is against the manifest weight only if the opposite conclusion is clearly evident. Parikh, 2014 IL App (1st) 123319, ¶ 28.
Cited 1 timesPublishedAnderson v. Department of Professional Regulation
284 Ill. Dec. 575 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 13, 2004
Gorchynsky to be more qualified and giving his testimony more weight, disagreed with the ALJ. The Board found that the following acts or omissions by Dr. … The Director’s decision was not clearly erroneous and therefore must be affirmed.
Cited 43 timesPublishedRegal Motors, Inc. v. Fiat Motors of North America, Inc.
133 Ill. App. 3d 370 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 13, 1985
Rather, plaintiff had to merely accept appointment as a service and parts center under the service agreement in order to qualify for the discounts. … Illinois case law has clearly established that an order denying class certification is not final and may be appealed from only under the permissive interlocutory appeals provisions of Supreme Court Rule 308 (73 Ill. 2d R.
Cited 5 timesPublished199 Ill. App. 422 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 12, 1916
It clearly appears, however, that he never returned or accounted for any part of the money collected. … against prosecution, was material in that it tended to show the probability of the testimony establishing embezzlement.
Cited 1 timesPublishedWells v. Board of Trustees of the Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
361 Ill. App. 3d 716 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 30, 2005
This consideration is irrelevant, as the cases cited above clearly establish that the relationship between offense and employment is causal rather than temporal. … An employee who changes positions on a fairly regular basis would effectively immunize from the statute much of his or her pension.
Cited 2 timesPublishedAppellate Court of Illinois · Sep 17, 2008
On cross-examination, Harris testified that he was granted immunity for his testimony at trial. … He agreed that he refused to testify in this case and that he was offered immunity by the State for his testimony. He also agreed that he again refused to testify even after he was offered immunity.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Barrett v. Cairo-Alexander County Bank
282 Ill. App. 343 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 16, 1935
The Cairo bank was qualified to act as a trust company and had on deposit with the auditor of public accounts, securities in the amount of $65,000. … The general deposit account was closed and a trust account was established.
Cited 3 timesPublishedChicago Recycling Coalition v. City of Chicago Department of Streets & Sanitation
2023 IL App (1st) 220154 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 11, 2023
The affidavit clearly establishes a systematic method of organizing and storing the third-party private hauler reports that the Department receives and that a search of the specific folder is reasonably likely to contain … Assuming that the data qualifies as a public record, the Department contends that Sauve’s affidavits establish that it does not keep this type of data for the recycling zones it services and that CRC has not presented any
Cited 1 timesPublished409 Ill. App. 3d 398 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 14, 2011
Clearly, she was “assisting the prosecution.” The question remains, however, whether she is an “entity.” … While Lawson seems to implicitly acknowledge that a municipality can qualify as an entity, it in no way holds, or even implies, that a person cannot qualify as an entity.
Cited 7 timesPublished108 Ill. App. 211 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 28, 1903
As has been stated, the plea was the general issue, which is a denial of all the plaintiff’s case, and required the plaintiff to prove her case by a preponderance of the evidence, and in this regard the burden was clearly … We are not aware that it has ever been questioned, doubted, limited or qualified. It lies at the very foundation of justice and is indispensable to its attainment.”
Cited 0 timesPublishedAppellate Court of Illinois · Jun 25, 2008
Supreme Court Rule 341(h)(7) (210 Ill. 2d R. 341(h)(7)) requires the appellant to clearly set out the issues raised, supported by relevant authority. … Westlake does not argue Nurse Cloud was not qualified or competent to state her opinion.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHidalgo v. Village Of Romeoville
Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 12, 2026
The court found that, consequently, the alleged injurious acts were a determination of policy and an exercise of discretion and that the trial evidence established section 2-201 immunity. Id. ¶¶ 27-29, 33 … According to plaintiff, these facts indicate that the Academy “was clearly operating as an entity intended to earn a profit that did not perform a governmental function,” precluding immunity under sections
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna