Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersill

10,000+ results

1.57s

  • People ex rel. Myers v. Pennsylvania Railroad

    19 Ill. 2d 122 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1960

    Moore v. … Dickey v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Pickering v. Orange

    2 Ill. 492 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1838

    Browne, Justice, delivered the opinion of the Court: This was an action on the case for keeping dogs which had been used to bite mankind, and to chase, worry, and kill other animals besides sheep, and which had killed divers … See Pickering v. Orange, Ante 338.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Beggs v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.

    258 Ill. 238 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1913

    (Beggs v. Postal Telegraph Co. 159 Ill. App. 246 .) … (Tyler, Ullman & Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 60 Ill. 421 ; Providence-Washington Ins. Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 247 id. 84.)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • West Chicago Street Railroad v. Levy

    182 Ill. 525 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1899

    See Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Ward, 135 Ill. 511 ; Chicago and Erie Railroad Co. v. Meech, 163 id. 305; North Chicago Street Railroad Co. v. Brown, 178 id. 187; Tyron v. … Booth, 100 Mass. 258 ; Baltimore and Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. Slanker, 180 Ill. 357 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Etchison v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

    320 Ill. 560 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1926

    The law does not require the rate fixed by him to be certified to the board of supervisors. (People v. Wabash Railroad Co. 271 Ill. 206 ; People v. Illinois Central Railroad Co. id. 221 ; People v. … New York Central Railroad Co. 270 Ill. 636 , People v. Cincinnati, Lafayette and Chicago Railroad Co. 271 id. 487, and People v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pennsylvania Co. v. Lynch

    90 Ill. 333 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1878

    Assop v. Yates, 2 H. & N. 768; Gibson v. Erie Railway Co. 63 N. Y. 453 ; Lanning v. New York Central Railroad Co. 49 id. 534 . This is fully sustained by this court in Camp Point Mfg. Co. v. … ends to which the boards were nailed, and having also strips nailed on near the extremities of the sides.

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • In Re Driscoll

    85 Ill. 2d 312 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1981

    The Hearing Board rejected the idea of alcoholism as a defense, and recommended that Driscoll be disbarred. The Review Board recommended that he be suspended for 30 months and thereafter until further order. … Similar approaches have been adopted in California (Tenner v. State Bar (1980), 28 Cal. 3d 202 , 617 P.2d 486 , 168 Cal.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Illinois Chiropractic Society v. Berns

    17 Ill. 2d 356 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 24, 1959

    Dyer v. … (Bourjois, Inc. v. Chapman, 301 U.S. 183, 188 , 81 L. ed. 1027; Lehmann v. State Board of Public Accountancy, 263 U.S. 394, 398 , 68 L. ed. 354.)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Donnelly v. Edgar

    117 Ill. 2d 59 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1987

    People v. Singleton (1984), 103 Ill. 2d 339, 345 . … (People v. Steppan (1985), 105 Ill. 2d 310, 316 ; Illinois Crime Investigating Com. v. Buccieri (1967), 36 Ill. 2d 556, 561 .)

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Hoskins v. Abbott

    69 Ill. 2d 20 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1977

    Mandamus is an appropriate remedy where the object is to compel a body, such as a board of review, to grant a hearing to a taxpayer where one is required by law. (Budberg v. … Ahlschlager v. Board of Review of Cook County (1933), 352 Ill. 157 .) Under certain circumstances mandamus may also be proper to compel the assessment of omitted property. (People ex rel. Village of Park Forest v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • The People v. I.C.R.R. Co.

    366 Ill. 408 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1937

    Gates v. Sweitzer , 347 Ill. 353 ; People v. Hassler , 262 id. 133. In People v. … Louis Railway Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Lynn v. Craft

    282 Ill. 483 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1918

    As authority for that proposition they cite People v. Painter, 267 Ill. 473 , People v. Swift, 270 id. 532 , and People v. Weis, supra. … Appellants’ second contention cannot be sustained, and for the reasons set forth in the following decisions it is overruled: People v. Madison, supra; People v. Stitt, 280 Ill. 553 ; People v. Fifer, id. 506; People v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Crane Co. v. Parker

    304 Ill. 331 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1922

    (Ward v. Durham, 134 Ill. 195 .) … (Brown v. Luehrs, 95 Ill. 195 .) Plaintiff in error used all diligence possible in the trial at law and apparently succeeded in defeating the fraudulent part of the defendant in error’s contention in that lawsuit.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Megginson v. Megginson

    367 Ill. 168 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1937

    (Brown v. Brown, 329 Ill. 198 ; Landes v. Landes, 268 id. 11; Colbert v. Rings, 231 id. 404.) … (Brown v. Brown, supra; Landes v. Landes, supra; Yarde v. Yarde, 187 Ill. 636 .)

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • People Ex Rel. Barrett v. Oregon State Savings Bank

    357 Ill. 545 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1934

    (People v. Bank of Rushville, 355 Ill. 336 ; People v. West Englewood, Bank, 353 id. 451 ; People v. Waukegan State Bank, 351 id. 548; People v. Marion Trust and Savings Bank, 347 id. 445; People v. … Freeman, 242 id. 152; State Board of Health v. Ross, 191 id. 87; People v. Town of Thornton, 186 id. 162).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • People Ex Rel. Wilson v. Illinois Central Railroad

    396 Ill. 510 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1947

    Knappenberger v. Hughes, 377 Ill. 126 . … Burkholder v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Rodisch v. Moore

    253 Ill. 296 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1912

    (Howell v. Foster, 122 Ill. 276 .) “It is a well established rule in equity that all persons are to be made parties who have any legal or equitable interest in the subject matter and result of the suit.” (Bradley v. … That rule, however, is no more applicable to a case of this character than it is to a suit to contest a will, and in Brown v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • The PEOPLE v. Lexow

    23 Ill. 2d 541 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1962

    Harry Lexow testified that he boarded the bus and handed the driver a dollar bill. … (People v. Malmenato, 14 Ill.2d 52 .) The evidence here was conflicting on all material points and the instruction was properly refused.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Heller v. McGuin

    261 Ill. 588 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1914

    This rule was quoted and adhered to in Gibson v. Brown, 214 Ill. 330 . In that case the vendors did not own part of the land they agreed to convey, at the time they made the contract. … The question was again before this court in Cohen v. Segal, 253 Ill. 34 . The court cited Mason v. Caldwell, supra, Gibsom v. Brown, supra, and Maryland Construction Co. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Chadwick v. Sergel

    269 Ill. 619 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 6, 1915

    City of Chicago v. Nichols, 177 Ill. 97 ; People v. Florville, 207 id. 79; People v. Read, 261 id. 502; People v. McElroy, 248 id. 574. … (Jones v. O’Connell, 266 Ill. 443 ; City of Chicago v. Nichols, supra.)

    Cited 16 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.