Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersill

10,000+ results

1.87s

  • Central Republic Trust Co. v. Evans

    378 Ill. 58 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1941

    When organized, Woodruff became chairman of the board, and Ward C. … Div. 846 ; German-American State Bank v. Watson, 99 Kas. 686 , 163 Pac. 637 . The principle is applicable to the chairman of the board of directors. Knass v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • People Ex Rel. Eitel v. Lindheimer

    371 Ill. 367 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1939

    England, 106 id. 125;) by contract, (People v. Board of Education, 349 id. 291; Rothschild v. Village of Calumet Park, 350 id. 330; Thompson v. Alexander, 11 id. 54; Reynolds v. … (Rothschild v. Village of Calumet Park, supra; People v. Board of Education, 349 Ill. 291 .)

    Cited 145 timesPublished
  • People v. Moore

    240 Ill. 408 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1909

    I(Russell v. High School Board, 212 Ill. 327 .) … Richards v. Raymond, 92 Ill. 612 ; Powell v. Board of Education, 97 id. 375.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • The People v. Smith

    368 Ill. 328 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1938

    (City of Fairfield v. Pappas, 362 Ill. 80 ; People v. McBride, supra.) … The question of the power of the board of trustees or the president of a county board with respect to determining and regulating the number, kind and classification of licenses is not here involved.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Kunin v. Forman Realty Corp.

    17 Ill. 2d 543 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1959

    Hafer v. Flynn, 13 Ill.2d 368 ; Bradford Supply Co. v. Waite, 392 Ill. 318 . … any of these facts or even that the board actually did decide to keep the reports from the plaintiff.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People Ex Rel. Thompson v. Dixon Masonic Building Ass'n

    348 Ill. 593 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1932

    W. 405 ; State v. Board of Assessors, 34 La. Ann. 574 ; Cumberland Lodge v. Mayor and City Council, 127 Tenn. 248 , 154 S. W. 1141 ; Horton v. … (First Congregational Church v. Board of Review, 254 Ill. 220 ; Grand Lodge v. Board of Review, supra.)

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Moore v. City of Chicago

    60 Ill. 243 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1871

    We have repeatedly held that the common council is the only body which can exercise the discretion by this ordinance vested in the board of public works; that vesting such discretion in the board, prepares the way to unfair … Foss v. City of Chicago, 56 Ill. 354 . Such an ordinance is illegal and void. For that reason, and that the collector was unauthorized to apply for the judgment, the same .is reversed and the cause remanded.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Rogerson v. Crawley

    274 Ill. 139 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1916

    (City of Chicago v. Town of Cicero, 210 Ill. 290 , and cited cases; Chalstran v. Board of Education, 244 id. 470.) The only restriction upon this power is that it shall not be done by local or special laws. … This doctrine is quoted with approval by this court in People v. Board, of Trustees, 170 Ill. 468 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Harmon v. City of Peoria

    373 Ill. 594 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1940

    (Johnson v. Village of Villa Park, 370 Ill. 272 ; People v. City of Rockford, 363 id. 531; Ehrlich v. Village of Wilmette, 361 id. 213; Merrill v. City of Wheaton, 356 id. 457.) … (Johnson v. Village of Villa Park, supra; People v. City of Rockford, supra; Ehrlich v. Village of Wilmette, supra.)

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • People Ex Rel. Oller v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.

    368 Ill. 199 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1938

    This last contention was definitely decided contrary to appellant’s contention in Lewis v. Community High School District, 308 Ill. 305 , and requires no discussion. … Stat. 1937, chap. 122, par. 406.8; People v. Madison, 280 Ill. 96 .) Inasmuch as we are of the opinion that the election was valid without this act, it will be unnecessary to dis-nice if Judgment affirmed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In re Appeal of Union Tank Line Co.

    204 Ill. 347 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1903

    Board of Review, 183 Ill. 278 , and cases cited. … For the reasons indicated the action of the board of review is disapproved, and appellant’s assessment, except as to the $1000 assessment made by the board of assessors, is held void. Action disapproved.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Seymour v. O. S. Richardson Fueling Co.

    205 Ill. 77 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1903

    (See also Tompkins v. Wiltberger, 56 Ill. 385 ; Mack v. Brown, 73 id. 295). In Jansen v. Varnum, 89 Ill. 100 , we said: “At law a judgment must be a unit as to all the defendants. … (See also Faulk v. Kellums, 54 Ill. 188 ; Robinson v. Brown, 82 id. 279 ; Stevens v. Catlin, 152 id. 56).

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Wilenou v. Handlon

    207 Ill. 104 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1904

    In the case'of Brown v. Brown, 167 Ill. 631 , a bill was filed by the father to cancel, as a cloud upon his title, a deed which he had executed to his son and caused to be recorded. … (Herbert v. Herbert, Breese, 354; Kingsbury v. Burnside, 58 Ill. 310 ; Maynard v. Maynard, 10 Mass. 458 ; Sullivan v. Eddy, 154 Ill. 199 .)

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • People Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Lierman

    415 Ill. 32 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1953

    Hoyne v. Sweitzer, 266 Ill. 459 .) … Armstrong v. Huggins, 407 Ill. 157 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • In re Eckberg

    Illinois Supreme Court · Jul 6, 2000

    The Review Board affirmed the findings and recommendations of the Hearing Board. However, the Review Board modified the conditions to reduce their scope and extent. … See Calloway v. Kinkelaar , 168 Ill. 2d 312, 329 (1995).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pierson v. Lyon & Healy

    243 Ill. 370 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1909

    Louis Railroad Co. v. … In Davis v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Golconda Northern Railway v. Gulf Lines Connecting Railroad

    265 Ill. 194 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1914

    The location of the line of a railroad is the act of the company and can be made only by the board of directors. (Black v. Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Co. 243 Ill. 534 ; East St. … (Hough v. Cook County Land Co. 73 Ill. 23 ; Barnes v. Suddard, 117 id. 237; Hamsher v. Hamsher, 132 id. 273; Cooney v. Booth Packing Co. 169 id. 370; Ehrman v. Union Central Life Ins. Co. 35 Ohio St. 324 .)

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Robinson v. New York Central Railroad

    283 Ill. 334 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1918

    (People v. Weis, 275 Ill. 581 .) … (Imperial Building Co. v. Board of Trade, 238 Ill. 100 ; Gillette v. Aurora Railways Co. 228 id. 261; Marshall v. Keach, 227 id. 35.)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Ames v. Schlaeger

    386 Ill. 160 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1944

    Kaskaskia Island Sanitary Dist. 265 Ill. 388 ; People’s Gas Light and Coke Co. v. Stuckart, 286 Ill. 164 ; Bistor v. Board of Assessors, 346 Ill. 362 ; Green v. Mail, 362 Ill. 518 ; Pekin Loan Co. v. … Board of School Inspectors, 231 Ill. 63 ; Michigan Central Railroad Co. v. Carr, 303 Ill. 354 ; Owens-Illinois Glass Co. v. McKibbin, 385 Ill. 245 .

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Vennum v. People ex rel. Galloway

    188 Ill. 158 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1900

    (People v. Clifford, 166 Ill. 165 ; People v. Chicago and Alton Railroad Co. 96 id. 369). … (Adcock v. City of Chicago, 160 Ill. 611 ; Hinkle v. City of Mattoon, 170 id. 316; Markley v. City of Chicago, id. 358).

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.