Case law

Village of Northbrook v. Sterba

318 Ill. 360 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1925

(Taylor v. Wright, 121 Ill. 455 ; Ditch v. Sennott, 116 id. 288.) … The ordinance provides that “village datum” shall mean “that plane fixed and established by an ordinance passed by the board of trustees of the village of Northbrook and approved by the president of said board of trustees

In re Appeal of Borden

208 Ill. 369 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1904

Scripps v. Board of Review, 183 Ill. 278 , and cases cited on page 284; Ellis v. People, 199 id. 548. In Matzenbaugh v. … Board of Review, 189 Ill. 234 , and Goldgart v. People, 106 id. 25.

Schreiber v. Illinois Liquor Control Commission

12 Ill. 2d 118 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1957

(Hornstein v. Illinois Liquor Control Com. 412 Ill. 365 ; O’Connor v. Rathje, 368 Ill. 83 ; People ex rel. Fitzgerald v. Harrison, 256 Ill. 102 .) More specifically it was said in Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. v. … Again in People v.

Naper Aero Club v. County of Du Page

30 Ill. 2d 447 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1964

Support for this contention is sought in Zweifel Manufacturing Corp. v. … Bank v. City of. Evanston, 24 Ill.2d 59 ; Trust Co. of Chicago v. City of Chicago, 408 Ill. 91 . The decree of the circuit court is affirmed. Decree affirmed.

The People v. Mulford

385 Ill. 48 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1943

People v. Wise, 379 Ill. 11 ; People v. Lanie, 378 Ill. 320 . … People v. McCarthy, 313 Ill. 303 ; People v. Walinsky, 300 Ill. 92 .

Wimmer v. Koenigseder

108 Ill. 2d 435 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 18, 1985

(See also Cunningham v. Brown (1961), 22 Ill. 2d 23 ; Rubitsky v. Russo’s Derby, Inc. (1966), 70 Ill. App. 2d 482 ; Colligan v. Cousar (1963), 38 Ill. App. 2d 392 .) … Finally, the plaintiff relies on Anderson v. Luitjens (1976), 311 Minn. 203 , 247 N.W.2d 913 , Blamey v. Brown (Minn. 1978), 270 N.W.2d 884 (overruled on other grounds in West American Insurance Co. v. Westin, Inc.

People ex rel. Miller v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

300 Ill. 399 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1921

(Board of Supervisors v. Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Co. 44 Ill. 229 ; Chicago and Northwestern Railway Co. v. Board of Supervisors, 44 id. 240 .) … (People’s Gas Light Co. v. Stuckart, 286 Ill. 164 .)

PEOPLE EX. REL. CTY. COL. v. Amer. Refrig. Co.

33 Ill. 2d 501 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1965

Appellee filed objections alleging that the local assessment of its property was "grossly excessive and fraudulent, having been made by the board of assessors, and upheld by the board of review with knowledge that such assessment … Hillison v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. 22 Ill.2d 88 ; People ex rel. Kohorst v. Gulf, Mobile and Ohio Railroad Co. 22 Ill.2d 104 . The judgment of the circuit court of St.

City of Rockford v. Grayned

46 Ill. 2d 492 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1970

Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131, 143 , 15 L. Ed. 2d 637, 646 , 86 S. Ct. 719 ; Cox v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 559, 574 , 13 L. Ed. 2d 487, 498 , 85 S. Ct. 476 .) … In Brown v.

People v. Hope

168 Ill. 2d 1 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1995

Larkin testified that two police officers boarded the bus and began talking to a man she identified as the defendant. … (Emerson, 122 Ill. 2d at 443 , citing California v. Brown (1987), 479 U.S. 538 , 93 L. Ed. 2d 934 , 107 S. Ct. 837 .)

In Re Rotman

136 Ill. 2d 401 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 30, 1990

Sandman to the Hearing Board. … Black v. Smith (1919), 290 Ill. 241, 251 . In the absence of mitigating circumstances, such a gross violation of an attorney’s oath calls for disbarment. (In re Braner (1987), 115 Ill. 2d 384, 394 .)

Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. City of Taylorville

307 Ill. 311 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1923

In Stone v. … To the same effect are Jenkins v. Pierce, 98 Ill. 646 , and Weld v. Rees, 48 id. 428. Appellant contends that under the holding in Scammon v.

Village of Grant Park v. Trah

218 Ill. 516 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1905

The village board had authority to determine the extent of such benefit, (White v. People, 94 Ill. 604 ; Pierson v. … Pollock, 141 Ill. 346 , Harwood v. City of Bloomington, 124 id. 48, Osgood v. City of Chicago, 154 id. 194, Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Co. v.

People v. Inghram

118 Ill. 2d 140 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1987

(In re Estate of Barker (1976), 63 Ill. 2d 113, 119 ; City of Waukegan v. Pollution Control Board (1974), 57 Ill. 2d 170, 174 .) … (People v. Joseph (1986), 113 Ill. 2d 36, 41 , quoting People v. Hawkinson (1927), 324 Ill. 285, 287 .) This court held in People ex rel. State Board of Health v.

Jersey Ice Cream Co. v. Industrial Commission

309 Ill. 187 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1923

(Chicago Daily News Co. v. Industrial Com. 306 Ill. 212 ; Ohio Building Vault Co. v. Industrial Board, 277 id. 96.) … (Peterson & Co. v. Industrial Board, 281 Ill. 326 ; Ohio Building Vault Co. v. Industrial Board, supra; Swift & Co. v. Industrial Com. 302 Ill. 38 ; Decatur Construction Co. v. Industrial Com. 296 id. 290; Perkinson v.

People ex rel. Abt v. Wiggins Ferry Co.

257 Ill. 452 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1913

Section 50 requires the Auditor to lay these schedules before the State Board of Equalization, which board shall thereupon assess such property. … People v. Illinois. Northern Railway, 248 Ill. 532 . It is apparent that the property objected for has been subjected to a double assessment for the year 1911. The East St.

City of Chicago v. Town of Cicero

210 Ill. 290 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1904

Wilson v. Board of Trustees, 133 Ill. 443 . “All municipal corporations are subject to legislative control, and may be changed, modified, enlarged, restrained or abolished to suit the exigencies of the case. (Coles v. … Madison County, Breese, 154; Bush v. Shipman, 4 Scam. 186 ; People ex rel. v. Wren, 4 id. 269 ; Holliday v. People, 5 Gilm. 214 ; People v. Brown, 83 Ill. 95 .)

In Re Contest of the Election for the Offices of Governor

93 Ill. 2d 463 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1983

(Young v. Mikva (1977), 66 Ill. 2d 579, 582 .) In Brown v. VanKeuren (1930), 340 Ill. 118 , this court was asked to decide an action under the “Pauper’s act,” which the court stated was purely a statutory action. … Brown v. VanKeuren (1930), 340 Ill. 118, 122 . Thus, before this court has any authority to act under the statute, a petition sufficient to trigger the application of the statute must be filed.

In Re Peel

126 Ill. 2d 397 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1989

(See Bates v. State Bar (1977), 433 U.S. 350 , 53 L. Ed. 2d 810 , 97 S. Ct. 2691 .) … (Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel (1985), 471 U.S. 626, 630-33 , 85 L. Ed. 2d 652, 659-61 , 105 S. Ct. 2265, 2271-72 .)

People ex rel. Patterson v. Fifer

280 Ill. 506 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1917

, acting on the relation of some 122 relators, was denied leave by the circuit court of said county to file an information in the nature of qito warranto against the respondents, who are the president and members of the board … (People v. Wisconsin Central Railroad Co. 219 Ill. 94 ; People v. City of Rock Island, 271 id. 412; People v. Militzer, 272 id. 387; People v. Peltier, 275 id. 217.) The case of People v.