Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersill

10,000+ results

0.95s

  • Stephany v. Castan

    168 Ill. 53 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1897

    (Miller v. Wilson, 37 Ill. App. 399 .) … Railroad Co. v. Bensley, 51 Fed. Rep. 738, is in point, the opinion there being delivered by Mr. Justice Brown, now of the United States Supreme Court.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Edmonds v. Industrial Commission

    350 Ill. 197 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1932

    (Becker Roofing Co. v. Industrial Com. 333 Ill. 340 ; Dietzen Co. v. Industrial Board, 279 id. 11.) The accident in this case occurred on a Saturday evening, when Mrs. … (Board of Education v. Industrial Com. 321 Ill. 23 ; Danville, Urbana and Champaign Railway Co. v. Industrial Com. 307 id. 142 ; Savoy Hotel Co. v. Industrial Board, 279 id. 329.) The fact that Mrs.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Seegers v. Dunlap

    248 Ill. 154 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1910

    The controlling question involved in the controversy is whether the vote taken was such as to require the trustees. to proceed to call an election for the high school board of education. … In People v. Forquer, Breese, 104, this court held that a mandamus would not be granted to compel a person to do an act where it is doubtful whether he has the right, by law, to do such act or not. In People v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re Howard

    Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1999

    The Board consolidated its findings on counts III, IV and V, noting that there was similar proof as to each charge. … Chicago Bar Ass’n v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Glos

    239 Ill. 24 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1909

    Afterward appellant was notified by the board of education that the board would ask for an order for the payment of the compensation money to it, and on June 13, 1908, the board and appellant appeared before the court in … the bill of exceptions shows that the court, in amending the order, had nothing in-writing, by way of memorandum, memorial paper or otherwise, for correcting an error, and that the case comes within the decision in Town v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Tribune Co. v. Industrial Commission

    290 Ill. 402 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1919

    Counsel for plaintiff in error insist that under the reasoning of this court in Haiselden v. Industrial Board, 275 Ill. 114 , Bushnell v. Industrial Board, 276 id. 262 , and Barrett Co. v. … (Chicago Railways Co. v. Industrial Board, 276 Ill. 112 .) In Wabash Railway Co. v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Keegan v. Hercer

    172 Ill. 271 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1898

    Justice Wilkin delivered the opinion of the court: This is an original proceeding in this court for a writ of mandamus against the respondent to compel him to correct his record of the proceedings of the board of education … People ex rel. v. City of Danville, 147 Ill. 127 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Rinne v. Blocki

    203 Ill. 363 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1903

    —Truesdale v. Peoria Grape Sugar Co. 101 Ill. 561 ; Mills v. Parlin, 106 id. 60.” And in McGann v. … We do not deem the filing of maps showing the proposed location of switch tracks in said streets, with the petitions presented to the board of trustees of the town of Lake, jurisdictional; and even if they were, the board

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Industrial Commission

    323 Ill. 54 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1926

    Henry v. Industrial Com. 293 Ill. 491 ; Bverett Hat Co. v. Industrial Com. 305 id. 564 ; Lumaghi Coal Co. v. Industrial Com. 318 id. 151; United States Fuel Co. v. Industrial Com. 310 id. 85; Terminal Railroad Ass’n v. … Industrial Board, 282 id. 489; Dietzen Co. v. Industrial Board, 279 id. 11.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Springe v. City of Chicago

    308 Ill. 356 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1923

    People v. Illinois Central Railroad Co. supra; Steenberg v. People, 164 Ill. 478 ; Gross v. People, 172 id. 571 ; Johnson v. People, 189 id. 83; People v. Culver, 281 id. 401; People v. Omen, 290 id. 59. … (Pipher v. People, 183 Ill. 436 ; Leitch v. People, id. 569 ; Perisho v. People, 185 id. 334; People v. Talmadge, 194 id. 67.)

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • People Ex Rel. Moore v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

    414 Ill. 419 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1953

    Harding v. … (Spence v. Selcke, 404 Ill. 98 .)

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Buttenuth v. St. Louis Bridge Co.

    123 Ill. 535 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1888

    In Thomas v. … In Cobb v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Equitable Coal Co. v. Industrial Commission

    325 Ill. 459 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1927

    Troupa testified that he examined Brown’s eye at different times and received a history of the case from him; that on an external examination he found on the eye-ball a dark-brown area about three millimeters in size; that … (Consolidated, Coal Co. v. Industrial Com. 322 Ill. 510 ; Mt. Olive Coal Co. v. Industrial Com. 320 id. 618 .) That burden has not been discharged.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nance v. Donk Bros. Coal & Coke Co.

    13 Ill. 2d 399 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1958

    Fowler v. Black, 136 Ill. 363 ; Wilson v. Wilson, 268 Ill. 270 ; Roberts v. Dazey, 284 Ill. 241 ; Keen v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. 392 Ill. 362 . … Shell Oil Co. v. Moore, 382 Ill. 556 ; Jilek v. Chicago, Wilmington & Franklin Coal Co. 382 Ill. 241 ; Walter v. Sohio Petroleum Co. 402 Ill. 33 ; Shell Oil Co. v. Dye, 135 F.2d 365 ; Adkins v. Adams, 152 F.2d 489 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Rea v. Wabash Railway Co.

    296 Ill. 527 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1921

    (Baltimore and Ohio Southwestern Railroad Co. v. People, 200 Ill. 541 ; People v. Sandberg Co. 282 id. 245; People v. Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Co. 290 id. 327.) … By the same section power is given to the village board to change such date. The only way in which such change can be effected, however, is by the passage of a valid ordinance for that purpose. (People v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In Re Levin

    118 Ill. 2d 77 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1987

    The Review Board adopted the recommendation. … Black v. Smith (1919), 290 Ill. 241, 251 .) “Conversion of a client’s funds involves moral turpitude and is a flagrant violation of an attorney’s duties.” (In re Pass (1985), 105 Ill. 2d 366, 369-70 .)

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • In re Appeal People's Bank

    203 Ill. 300 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1903

    The Supreme Court of Indiana, however, in the later case of Ogden v. … Shotwell v. Moore, 129 U. S. 590 . The case of Holly Springs Savings and Insurance Co. v. Supervisors of Marshall County, 52 Miss. 281 , ( 24 Am.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • City of Chicago v. O'Connell

    278 Ill. 591 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1917

    (Durand v. Dyson, 271 Ill. 382 .) In Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. … Weiner, 271 Ill. 74 ; Durand v. Dyson, supra; Greene v.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Ives v. City of Chicago

    30 Ill. 2d 582 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1964

    (Arms v. City of Chicago, 314 Ill. 316, 321 .) … Village of La Grange Park, 14 Ill. 2d 65 ; City of Chicago v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Mt. Olive & Staunton Coal Co. v. Industrial Commission

    355 Ill. 222 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1934

    (Dietzen Co. v. Industrial Board, 279 Ill. 11 .) … (Union Starch Co. v. Industrial Com. 344 Ill. 77 .) In Dietzen Co. v. Industrial Board, supra, and in Randall Co. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.