Case law

Tillotson v. Mitchell

111 Ill. 518 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1884

In the case of Dyer v. … In Williams v. Brown, 14 Ill. 200 , it was said Williams was in possession all the while.

People Ex Rel. Arnd v. Heckard

341 Ill. 144 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1930

(People v. Salomon, 54 Ill. 39 .) … (State v. Holcomb, 81 Kan. 879 .) The defendants cannot evade their duty by answering that the time for its performance has passed when it still may be lawfully performed. (People v. Lueders, 287 Ill. 107 .)

Crandall v. Payne

154 Ill. 627 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1895

(Eddy v. Roberts, 17 Ill. 505 ; Brown v. Strait, 19 id. 88; Bristow v. Lane, 21 id. 194.) The case at bar, however, does not come within the reason of those decisions.

North Chicago Street Railroad v. Wiswell

168 Ill. 613 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1897

Cicero and Proviso Street Railway Co. v. Meixner, 160 Ill. 320 ; Pullman Palace Car Co. v. Laack, 143 id. 242; Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Richards, 152 id. 59; Wenona Coal Co. v. … Holmquist, id. 581; Purdy v. Hall, 134 id. 298; Chicago and Northwestern Railway Co. v. Dunleavy, 129 id. 132; Bartelott v. International Bank, 119 id. 259; Simmons v. Chicago and Tomah Railroad Co. 110 id. 340.

Tunison v. Chamblin

88 Ill. 378 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1878

and Case; and prays that his title be established; that Brown and Case be decreed to convey to him, and for the removal of clouds from the title of defendant. … Mixell v. Lutz, 34 Ill. 382 ; Moritz v. Hoffman, 35 id. 553; Gridley v. Watson, 53 id. 186; Wooldridge v. Gage, 68 id. 157; Guffin v. First National Bank, 74 id. 259.

Wright v. Grover

27 Ill. 426 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1862

Brown v. Rielly, 22 Ill. 45 .

Edwards v. Edwards

31 Ill. 474 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1863

We have decided the main question here presented in Brown v. Gorton, ante, 416, and shall spend no more time with it now. There are some questions presented, we presume, as make-weights upon the assessment of damages.

Village of Morgan Park v. Knopf

199 Ill. 444 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1902

The only claim of plaintiff in error is, that the village board did not know, as a matter of fact, what the charge of ten cents was based on. … People v. Foster, 133 Ill. 496 .

People Ex Rel. Stephens v. Collins

35 Ill. 2d 499 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1966

Dorfman v. Gerber, 29 Ill.2d 191 ; People ex rel. Woll v. Graber, 394 Ill. 362 ; Bruce v. Department of Registration and Education, 26 Ill.2d 612 ; Menning v. … Department of Registration and Education, 14 Ill.2d 553 ; Harrison v. Civil Service Com. 1 Ill.2d 137 ; Investors Syndicate v. Hughes, 378 Ill. 413 .

Lily Lake Road Defenders v. County of McHenry

156 Ill. 2d 1 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1993

See Willis v. Menard County Board of Commissioners (1977), 55 Ill. App. 3d 26 ; Elmhurst-Chicago Stone Co. v. County of Kane (1970), 129 Ill. App. 2d 190 ; La Salle National Bank v. County of Cook (1965), 60 Ill. … HV-k, par. 1004; see also Granite City Division of National Steel v. Illinois Pollution Control Board (1993), 155 Ill. 2d 149 . The IEPA does not purport to confer zoning powers upon the Board or the Agency.

People ex rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. Loeff

292 Ill. 55 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1920

He has never procured the apprentice certificate from the board of pharmacy for Paul. … (People v. Pattison, 241 Ill. 89 ; People v. Holt, 279 id. 107 .) He will not be allowed to justify his acts by a claim for fees to which he is not entitled. People v. Bamborough, 255 Ill. 92 .

Coari v. Olsen

91 Ill. 273 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1878

Dyer v. Martin, 4 Scam. 147 ; Brown v. Gaffney, 28 Ill. 150 ; Doyle v. Teas, 4 Scam. 202 ; Williams v. Brown et al. 14 Ill. 201 ; Davis v. Hopkins, 15 id. 519; Prettyman v. Wilkey, 19 id. 241; Truesdale v. … Ford, 37 id. 210; Lumbard v. Abbey, 73 id. 178; Whittaker v. Miller, 83 id. 386; Strong et al. v. Shea, id. 575.

People Ex Rel. Schrock v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.

349 Ill. 216 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1932

Thus, People v. … Likewise in People v. Chicago, Milwaukee and St.

Asay v. Sparr

26 Ill. 115 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1861

Brown v. Smith, 24 Ill. 197 ; Wolcott v. Holcomb, ib. 331. The judgment of the court below is reversed, and the cause remanded.1 Judgment reversed.

People Ex Rel. Radium Dial Co. v. Ryan

371 Ill. 597 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1939

(Chicago Railways Co. v. Industrial Board, 276 Ill. 112 ). It is thus seen that it complies with substantially all constitutional requirements applicable. It should be liberally construed (Scholl v. … State Board of Examiners, 259 Ill. 15 , where it was held that authority to revoke an architect’s license by the board of examiners, without any provision for judicial review, did not violate due process. In People v.

Wilson v. Weber

96 Ill. 454 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 14, 1880

Per Curiam : The main question in this case is determined against the appellant, in the case of Ohio and Mississippi Railroad Co. v. Weber, ante, p. 443. … It is not denied that the distribution was correctly made, but it is said the board made no order of distribution, and the secretary of the board made the distribution after the adjournment of the board.

Dunlap v. City of Woodstock

405 Ill. 410 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1950

Appellants then apppeared before the city council, which referred the matter back to the zoning board for further consideration, and, after a second hearing, the board came to the same conclusion as in the first instance. … In Kennedy v.

O'Callaghan v. Industrial Commission

290 Ill. 222 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1919

shall be commenced within twenty days after receipt of notice of the decision of the board.” … Chicago and Alton Railroad Co. v. Industrial Board, 274 Ill. 336 ; Munn v. Industrial Board, 274 id. 70; Big Muddy Coal and Iron Co. v. Industrial Board, 279 id. 235.

Arnold v. Crowder

81 Ill. 56 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1876

In a valuable treatise on the “Law of Fixtures,” by Archibald Brown, of the Middle Temple, and also author of “Brown’s Law Dictionary,” several cases are cited, in conformity with the views here expressed. … One is Mather v. Fraser, 4 W.

Michigan Southern & Northern Indiana Railroad v. Day

20 Ill. 375 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1858

In 8 Cowen R. 223, Ackley and Gray v. … So where the master of a vessel is directed to tranship, or deliver on board another vessel, a delivery on board such other vessel is the termination of the duty of a common carrier. Van Santwood v. St.