Case law

Browning v. WOMICK

234 Ill. 2d 518 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 1, 2009

920 N.E.2d 1071 (2009) 234 Ill.2d 518 BROWNING v. WOMICK. No. 109052. Supreme Court of Illinois. November 1, 2009. Disposition of Petition for Leave to Appeal [*] Denied.

In Re Chatz

131 Ill. 2d 499 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1989

In July of 1978, respondent petitioned for a receiver’s fee in Schafer v. Three Star Enterprises, 78 — CH—574, a case presided over by Holzer. … Indeed, the only evidence of Holzer “repaying” respondent is the fee granted to respondent in Schafer v. Three Star Enterprises.

People Ex Rel. Murray v. Holmes

341 Ill. 23 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1930

People v. Kinsey, 294 Ill. 530 ; People v. Lowenstein, 297 id. 395. At the December term, 1917, it had been held in the case of People v. … In People v.

People ex rel. Cline v. Rhodes

231 Ill. 270 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1907

(Barr v. Village of Auburn, 89 Ill. 361 .) … (People v. McCullough, 210 Ill. 488 .)

Gage v. People ex rel. Hanberg

213 Ill. 468 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1904

If appellant had reason to believe that the board of local improvements had not complied with the law, he should have availed himself of the proper remedy in apt time to compel the board to do its duty. (Hamilton v. … Lubukee, 51 Ill. 415 ; Bush v. Sherman, 80 id. 160; Givins v. People, 194 id. 150.)

Van Frank v. United States Masonic Benevolent Ass'n

158 Ill. 560 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1895

In Bagley v. A. O. U. … Hansen v. Supreme Lodge Knights of Honor, 140 Ill. 301 . Twenty-two instructions were asked for plaintiff and ten were given.

Schaeffer v. Ardery

241 Ill. 27 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1909

of review of the said.county and upon an original assessment made against her as guardian by said board. … This case, on the facts set out, is plainly within the rules laid down by this court in Condit v. Widmayer, 196 Ill. 623 , Weber v. Baird, 208 id. 209, and Carney v. People, 210 id. 434.

Abrams v. City of Chicago

211 Ill. 2d 251 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 20, 2004

A few minutes later, plaintiffs sister, Dorothy Brown, placed another 911 call on behalf of plaintiff. … She then gave Brown the number of a private ambulance service.

People Ex Rel. Carr v. Kesner

325 Ill. 285 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1927

Some of the previous cases are Gage v. People, 219 Ill. 634 ; Case v. City of Sullivan, 222 id. 56; People v. Conway, 253 id. 140; People v. Conway, 261 id. 26; Price v. Board of Local Improvements, 266 id. 299. … The language quoted is from Case v. City of Sullivan, supra.

People ex rel. Oelsner v. Andrus

299 Ill. 50 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1921

(Bloomington, Decatur and Champaign Railroad Co. v. Industrial Board, 276 Ill. 454 ; Illinois Midland Coal Co. v. Industrial Board, 277 id. 333.) … (Ohio and Mississippi Railroad Co. v. Lawrence County, 27 Ill. 50 ; Hesing v. Attorney General, 104 id. 292; Hileman v. Beale, 115 id. 355; Steger v. Steger, 165 id. 579; Vickers v.

Mt. Olive & Staunton Coal Co. v. Industrial Commission

355 Ill. 222 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1934

(Dietzen Co. v. Industrial Board, 279 Ill. 11 .) … (Union Starch Co. v. Industrial Com. 344 Ill. 77 .) In Dietzen Co. v. Industrial Board, supra, and in Randall Co. v.

In Re Lane

127 Ill. 2d 90 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1989

The case, Steinberg v. Chicago Medical School (Cook Co. Cir. Ct.), No. 74 — CH—4045 (see also Steinberg v. … (See People v. Henry (1970), 47 Ill. 2d 312, 321 .)

Lindblad v. Town of Normal

224 Ill. 362 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1906

All the details of the improvement need not be set out in the resolution of the local board of improvements, (Lanphere v. City of Chicago, 212 Ill. 440 ; McLennan v. … (Smith v. City of Chicago, 214 Ill. 155 ; Wetmore v. City of Chicago, 206 id. 367.)

Chicago, Indianapolis & St. Louis Short Line Ry. Co. v. People ex rel. McCormick

225 Ill. 519 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1907

We have held in Chicago and Northwestern Railway Co. v. People, 184 Ill. 174 , People v. Kankakee and Southwestern Railroad Co. 218 id. 588, and Litchfield and Madison Railway Co. v. … Said board of auditors and assessor gave their consent to an additional levy of ten cents for “the specific purpose of iron bridge.”

Krachock v. Department of Revenue

403 Ill. 148 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1949

(Sargent Co. v. Baublis, 215 Ill. 428 ; Owens-Illinois Glass Co. v. McKibbin, 385 Ill. 245 .) … A full review of the authorities sustaining this position will be found in Noorman v. Department of Public Works and Building, 366 Ill. 216 ; Posinski v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St.

People v. O'Donnell

291 Ill. 178 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1919

This question was raised in the case of People v. Doras, 290 Ill. 188 , and was there decided adversely to the contention of plaintiffs in error herein. … at the time of the imposition of the sentence, been repealed by the act of 1917, and there was therefore no board of pardons in existence.

People Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Maynard

352 Ill. 283 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1933

In Gross v. … It is true, as pointed out by the collector, that appellee could have by mandamus compelled the board of local improvements to comply with section 84. (Price v. Board of Local Improvements, 266 Ill. 299 .)

In re Howard

Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1999

The Board consolidated its findings on counts III, IV and V, noting that there was similar proof as to each charge. … Chicago Bar Ass’n v.

People ex rel. Stuckart v. Patten

287 Ill. 392 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1919

(People v. Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Co. 282 Ill. 206 ; People v. Cincinnati, Indianapolis and Western Railway Co. 253 id. 420.) … Louis and Western Railroad Co. v. People, 225 Ill. 425 ; People v. Kankakee and Southwestern Railroad Co. 237 id. 362.)

Bowen v. Russell

272 Ill. 313 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1916

(Brush v. Lemma, 77 Ill. 496 ; Linegar v. Rittenhouse, 94 id. 208; Foley v. Tyler, 161 id. 167; King v. Jordan, 198 id. 457; Baker v. Shinkle, 249 id. 154.) … See People v. Metzker, 47 Cal. 524 ; Mitchell v. Witt, 98 Va. 459 ; Henry v. City Council of Camden, 42 N. J. L. 335; Attorney General v. Sands, 68 N. H. 54; Booth v. County Court of Arapahoe County, 18 Colo. 561 .