Case law

People v. Schaeffer

310 Ill. 574 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1923

Appellant also contends that the Medical Practice act of 1917 was in substance and in fact declared void by the decision of this court in •the case of People v. Love, 298 Ill. 304 . … Our attention has been called to the fact by the People in this case that said act has been held constitutional in the case of People v. Gordon, 194 Ill. 560 , and cases there cited.

Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Grant

167 Ill. 489 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1897

(Chicago and Northwestern Railway Co. v. Miller, 72 Ill. 144 ; Ohio and Mississippi Railroad Co. v. Weber, 96 id. 443; Chicago and Alton Railroad Co. v. People, 98 id. 350; Peoria, Decatur and Evansville Railway Co. v. … The case of Chicago and Alton Railroad Co. v.

Arnold v. Keil

252 Ill. 340 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1911

(Kesner v. Miesch, 204 Ill. 320 .) In Elmendorf v. … (Beall v. Albert, 159 Ill. 127 ; Graham v. Peters, 248 id. 50; Brents v. Smith, supra.)

City of Sterling v. Thomas

60 Ill. 264 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1871

City of Bloomington v. Bay, 42 Ill. 508 . … That the duty of the authorities extended thus far is shown by the cases of the City of Chicago v. Gallagher, Adm’x, 44 Ill. 295 , and City of Springfield v. LeClaire, 49 Ill. 476 .

Lazarus v. Village of Northbrook

31 Ill. 2d 146 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1964

(Columbus Park Cong. v. Board of Appeals of Chicago, 25 Ill.2d 65, 70 .) This construction of the applicable statutes has been adhered to in many cases. (Ward v. Village of Skokie, 26 Ill.2d 415 ; Camboni’s Inc. v. … (Columbus Park Cong. v. Board of Appeals of Chicago, 25 Ill.2d 65, 71 .)

People Ex Rel. Davidson v. Bradley

382 Ill. 383 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1943

Hartmann v. Board of Education, 356 Ill. 577 , upheld the recovery of wages for a calendar year of nine months, where the teacher had been discharged without any just or reasonable cause. … Such, also, was the case of Bowden v. Board of Education, 264 Ill. App. 1 . School Directors v. Reddick, 77 Ill. 628 , and Neville v.

Minkus v. Pond

326 Ill. 467 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1927

The Supreme Court of California in Miller v. Board of Public Works, 38 A. L. … Zahn & Ross v. Board of Public Works, U. S. Sup. Ct. Adv. October term, 1926.

County of Cook v. Hartney

169 Ill. 566 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1897

(Wulff v. Aldrich, 124 Ill. 591 ). … In City of Springfield v.

In Re Lamberis

93 Ill. 2d 222 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1982

The Hearing Board recommended that the respondent be censured. … E.g., In re Abbamonto (1960), 19 Ill. 2d 93, 97 (wrongful conversion of down payment on real estate); Stratmore v. State Bar (1975), 14 Cal. 3d 887 , 538 P.2d 229 , 123 Cal.

People ex rel. Hewitt v. Cincinnati, Lafayette & Chicago Railway Co.

256 Ill. 280 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1912

Whether the certificate reached the board through the •supervisor of the town or by some other means is immaterial, so far as the validity of the tax is concerned. People v. … (People v. Weber, 222 Ill. 180 .) The levy of this tax was therefore illegal, and the court should have sustained appellant’s objection thereto.

Peabody Coal Co. v. Industrial Commission

289 Ill. 330 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1919

(Chicago and Alton Railroad Co. v. Industrial Board, 274 Ill. 336 ; Ohio Building Vault Co. v. Industrial Board, 277 id. 96.) … (Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Industrial Board, 277 Ill. 74 .) In Bromwell v.

The PEOPLE v. Holloman

46 Ill. 2d 311 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1970

In support of his position defendant cites People v. Machroli (1969), 44 Ill.2d 222 ; People v. Tate (1967), 38 Ill.2d 184 ; Amacher v. Superior Court (1969), 1 Cal. App. 3rd 150, 81 Cal. Rptr. 558 ; Bailey v. … However, in People v.

Campbell v. Quinlin

4 Ill. 288 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1841

In the case of Brown v. Modisett, (2) the Court says “ that Brown, the plaintiff in error, relies “ on the seventy-second section of the actrespectingjustic.es of the peace.” (Rev. Code 1831, p. 317.) … The same construction was given to this statute in the cases of Barnes v. Modisett et als., Butler et al. v. Skomp, (3) Dougherty v.

Knolls Condominium Ass'n v. Harms

202 Ill. 2d 450 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 21, 2002

Villegas v. Board of Fire & Police Commissioners, 167 Ill. 2d 108, 123 (1995). … People v. Villarreal, 152 Ill. 2d 368, 379 (1992); People ex rel. Kempiners v. Draper, 113 Ill. 2d 318, 321 (1986).

Kingbrook, Inc. v. Pupurs

202 Ill. 2d 24 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 18, 2002

Moreover, Kingbrook notes that when mentioning the specificity requirement, Beck merely cited Andersen, and the only authority cited in Andersen was Brown v. Decatur Memorial Hospital, 83 Ill. 2d 344 (1980). … We did not find a lack of appellate jurisdiction in Brown. For Kingbrook’s part, it relies on Berg v. Allied Security, Inc., 193 Ill. 2d 186 (2000).

County of DeWitt v. City of Clinton

194 Ill. 521 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1902

Foss v. City of Chicago, 56 Ill. 354 ; Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. City of Chicago, 144 id. 391 ; Cass v. People, 166 id. 126. … the board may deem necessary.”

Prate Roofing and Installations, LLC v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Corp.

2022 IL 127140 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 19, 2022

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Menards, Inc., 202 Ill. 2d 586, 593 (2002). Our review is de novo. See Julie Q. v. … In Travelers Indemnity Co. v. D.J.

Moustgaard v. Industrial Commission

287 Ill. 156 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1919

(Bushnell v. Industrial Board, 276 Ill. 262 ; Haiselden v. Industrial Board, 275 id. 114.) The claim need not be in writing but may be verbal, (Suburban Ice Co. v. … Industrial Board, 274 id. 630,) and is sufficient if the employer is informed by it that the employee intends to claim the benefit of the act. (Conway Co. v. Industrial Board, 282 Ill. 313 .)

Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co. v. People ex rel. Knupp

198 Ill. 318 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1902

In the case of Peoria and Pekin Union Railway Co. v. … We there held, also, that the statutory requirements were satisfied if the order of the board set forth, “substantially, the amount and purpose of the excess,” and that the preamble and resolution of the board are both part

Rosehill Cemetery Co. v. City of Chicago

352 Ill. 11 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1933

(People v. Cregier, 138 Ill. 401 ; Swift v. Klein, 163 id. 269; People v. Harrison, 191 id. 237.) … (Wahle v. Reinbach, 76 Ill. 322 ; Wente v. Commonwealth Fuel Co. 232 id. 526; Oehler v. Levy, 234 id. 595.)