Case law

People ex rel. Stevenson v. Higgins

15 Ill. 110 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1853

We think it was conferred upon, and was designed to be exercised by the board of trustees. … In support of the position as asserted for the defendant, the case of The Commonwealth v. Barry, Hardin, 229, was referred to.

People ex rel. McCormick v. Czarnecki

266 Ill. 372 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1914

The board notified the representatives of the republican party that a vacancy existed in the nomination of that party for the offices of president of the county board and member of the county board from the city of Chicago … (Munn v. People, 69 Ill. 80 ; Hawthorn v. People, 109 id. 302; Moeng v. People, 138 id. 513; People v. Thompson, 155 id. 451 ; People v. Rose, 203 id. 46; People v. McBride, 234 id. 146; Town of Cicero v.

The People v. B. O.S.W.R.R. Co.

366 Ill. 318 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1937

(Kepley v. People , 123 Ill. 367 ; Huston v. Newgass , 228 id. 575; People v. Illinois Central Railroad Co. 295 id. 408.) … In People v.

People ex rel. Reynolds v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

300 Ill. 415 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1921

Section 5 of the Detention Home act, as amended in 1919, conferred upon the county board the power to levy a tax for county purposes in addition to that provided for by the Revenue law, and it was held in People v. … (People v. Klee, 282 Ill. 440 .)

Village of Elmwood Park v. W. A. Black Co.

352 Ill. 150 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1933

In City of East Peoria v. … In City of Alton v.

Suburban Ready-Mix Corp. v. Village of Wheeling

25 Ill. 2d 548 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1962

In Tugman v. … Keller v.

Carter v. Winter

32 Ill. 2d 275 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1965

(Zank v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Co. 17 Ill.2d 473 ; Heideman v. Kelsey, 414 Ill. 453 ; Seeds v. Chicago Transit Authority, 409 Ill. 566 .) … Tucker v. New York, Chicago and St. Louis Railroad Co. 12 Ill.2d 532 ; Dee v. City of Peru, 343 Ill. 36 ; Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Oswald, 338 Ill. 270 ; Wilson v.

The People v. Headley

392 Ill. 464 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1946

(People v. Brown, 389 Ill. 202 .) What we said in the Brown case is controlling here. There being no error in the judgment, it is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.

Misner v. Bullard

43 Ill. 470 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1867

The same doctrine was announced in the case of Briscoe v. Allison, ante, p. 291. In the case of Drake v. … In the case of Ryan v. Anderson, 25 Ill. 372 , the court held, that costs, including counsel fees, might be allowed as damages, on the dissolution of an injunction.

In Re Gold

77 Ill. 2d 224 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1979

The Review Board affirmed the Hearing Board’s findings and recommendation that the respondent be suspended for one year. … Professional disciplining is a melancholy business, and v the case of this attorney is no exception.

People ex rel. Cofoid v. New York Central Railroad

282 Ill. 458 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1918

of said county in a certain suit then and there pending, entitled People v. … It was also held by this court in People v. Mathews, (ante, p. 85,) People v. New York Central Railroad Co. (ante, p. 19,) People v. Leigh, (ante, p. 17,) People v. Illinois Central Railroad Co.

Christiansen v. William Graver Tank Works

223 Ill. 142 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1906

There was also a rise in the floor of six inches just west of the ten-inch board, and a shelf parallel to and below the board, and also an upright board extending from the upper edge of the ten-inch board at a point just … Co. v.

Stojanoff v. Department of Registration & Education

79 Ill. 2d 394 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1980

(Homefinders, Inc. v. City of Evanston (1976), 65 Ill. 2d 115, 128 .) Under the provisions of section 17.10 of the Medical Practice Act (Ill. Rev. … Whether they need ever be addressed depends upon the action taken upon remand, and as the court said in Mahin v.

The People v. Hollenbeck

322 Ill. 443 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1926

This same objection was overruled by this court in People v. Talbot, (ante, p. 416,) for the reasons in that case stated. … People v. Montgomery, 271 Ill. 580 ; Kettles v. People, 221 id. 221; Williams v. People, 121 id. 84; Noecker v. People, 91 id. 468.

Meredosia Levee & Drainage District v. Industrial Commission

285 Ill. 68 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1918

(Decatur Railway Co. v. Industrial Board, 276 Ill. 472 .) … (Foster v. City of Chicago, 197 Ill. 264 .)

Houston v. City of Chicago

191 Ill. 559 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1901

The latest case reported is Givins v. City of Chicago, 188 Ill. 348 . … The sidewalks were not to be paved, and the width of the wings so to be paved is a matter of easy ascertainment, as said in County of Adams v. City of Quincy, 130 Ill. 566 . See, also, Woods v.

Whitney v. Mayo

15 Ill. 251 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1853

R. 239; Greenup v. Porter et al. 3 Scam. R. 65; Scott v. Moore et al. Ib. 315; Willis et al. v. Henderson, 4 Ib. 20 ; Spear v. Campbell et al. Ib. 426; Montgomery v. Brown, 2 Gilm. R. 581; Ho are v. … PL § 96 et seq.; Martin v. Dryden, 1 Gilm. R. 209; Montgomery v. Brown, 2 lb. 581. And in cases of voluntary associations, like this, equity will not sustain a bill by part, unless the others be made defendants?

In Re Chapman

69 Ill. 2d 494 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1978

Sayad Company v. … (See Brandes v. Illinois Protestant Children’s Home, Inc., 33 Ill. App. 2d 319 .)

Gardner v. Mullins

234 Ill. 2d 503 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 24, 2009

BACKGROUND Mary Ann Aiello, a member of the Winnebago County board (board), passed away on June 26, 2008. Her term was set to expire on December 6, 2010. … See Cook County Republican Party v. Illinois State Board of Elections, 232 Ill. 2d 231 (2009). ANALYSIS I.

Ohio and Mississippi Railway Co. v. Commissioners of Highways

117 Ill. 279 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1886

overseers of roads, as above stated. ” , We have held in Leachman v. … Revenue act, sec. 232, chap. 120, (2 Starr & Curtiss,) p. 2105; The People v. Winhelman, 95 Ill. 412 ; Big-gins v. The People, 96 id. 381; The People v. Davis, 112 id. 272; Bowman v. The People, 114 id. 474.