Case law

Icrr Co. v. Ill. Commerce Com'n

411 Ill. 526 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1952

In *531 the case of Wabash Railroad Co. v. … In Wabash Railway Co. v.

Botkin v. Osborne

39 Ill. 101 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1866

in this State, who shall not, before his employment, exhibit to said board, or to a committee of said board, a certificate of qualification obtained under the provisions of this act,” etc. … On this point, see Manlove v. McHatton, 4 Scam. 95 ; Patrick v. Rucker, 19 Ill. 429 . Upon the remaining point, awarding execution against the appellants, this was also error.

People Ex Rel. Weber v. Cohn

339 Ill. 121 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1930

In People v. … The court said in Hall v.

People ex rel. Stevenson v. Higgins

15 Ill. 110 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1853

We think it was conferred upon, and was designed to be exercised by the board of trustees. … In support of the position as asserted for the defendant, the case of The Commonwealth v. Barry, Hardin, 229, was referred to.

The People v. Finley

332 Ill. 40 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1928

Defendant was not at home but Brown was present, and the officers proceeded to search the house. While the officers were on the premises defendant drove up to the house in a Chevrolet touring car. … In the case of People v.

People ex rel. Reynolds v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

300 Ill. 415 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1921

Section 5 of the Detention Home act, as amended in 1919, conferred upon the county board the power to levy a tax for county purposes in addition to that provided for by the Revenue law, and it was held in People v. … (People v. Klee, 282 Ill. 440 .)

Village of Elmwood Park v. W. A. Black Co.

352 Ill. 150 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1933

In City of East Peoria v. … In City of Alton v.

Chicago Union Traction Co. v. City of Chicago

209 Ill. 444 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1904

Ottawa, Oswego and Fox River Valley Railroad Co. v. McMath, 91 Ill. 104 ; Bromley v. People, 150 id. 297; West Chicago Street Railroad Co. v. Krueger, 168 id. 586. … It appears that the practice followed in this case has been followed in all cases by the board of local improvements in the city of Chicago, and it is urged, citing People v.

Peterson v. Chicago Consolidated Traction Co.

231 Ill. 324 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1907

The question of the negligence of a passenger in standing on the platform or stepping on the foot-board of a street car while in motion is a question of fact for the jury. North Chicago Street Railroad Co. v. … Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Johnsen, 135 Ill. 641 ; McNulta v. Lockridge, 137 id. 270; Chicago and Alton Railroad Co. v. Fisher, 141 id. 614.

Carter v. Winter

32 Ill. 2d 275 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1965

(Zank v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Co. 17 Ill.2d 473 ; Heideman v. Kelsey, 414 Ill. 453 ; Seeds v. Chicago Transit Authority, 409 Ill. 566 .) … Tucker v. New York, Chicago and St. Louis Railroad Co. 12 Ill.2d 532 ; Dee v. City of Peru, 343 Ill. 36 ; Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Oswald, 338 Ill. 270 ; Wilson v.

The People v. Headley

392 Ill. 464 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1946

(People v. Brown, 389 Ill. 202 .) What we said in the Brown case is controlling here. There being no error in the judgment, it is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.

People ex rel. Stifle v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

266 Ill. 98 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1914

Chicago and Alton Railroad Co. v. People, 155 Ill. 276 ; People v. Chicago and Alton Railroad Co. 248 id. 87. … In Merlo v.

The People v. B. O. R. R. Co.

322 Ill. 623 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1926

People , 87 Ill. 189 ; Highway Comrs. v. Highway Comrs. 60 id. 58.) In the case of McMechan v. … The board of town auditors only have the power to consent to such a levy by the commissioners when the rate exceeds fifty cents on the $100 valuation. ( Robinson v. McKenney , 239 Ill. 343 .)

Crawford v. Hurst

316 Ill. 215 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1925

(Riggs v. Dickinson, 2 Scam. 437 ; Mulloy v. Mulloy, 231 Ill. 285 .) … The decree of the circuit court of Brown county will be affirmed. „ ^ , Decree affirmed.

Misner v. Bullard

43 Ill. 470 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1867

The same doctrine was announced in the case of Briscoe v. Allison, ante, p. 291. In the case of Drake v. … In the case of Ryan v. Anderson, 25 Ill. 372 , the court held, that costs, including counsel fees, might be allowed as damages, on the dissolution of an injunction.

In Re Gold

77 Ill. 2d 224 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1979

The Review Board affirmed the Hearing Board’s findings and recommendation that the respondent be suspended for one year. … Professional disciplining is a melancholy business, and v the case of this attorney is no exception.

Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. Industrial Commission

293 Ill. 62 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1920

(People v. McGoorty, 270 Ill. 610 .) … Smith-Lohr Coal Co. v. Industrial Board, 279 Ill. 88 ; Peoples. McGoorty, supra.

Stojanoff v. Department of Registration & Education

79 Ill. 2d 394 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1980

(Homefinders, Inc. v. City of Evanston (1976), 65 Ill. 2d 115, 128 .) Under the provisions of section 17.10 of the Medical Practice Act (Ill. Rev. … Whether they need ever be addressed depends upon the action taken upon remand, and as the court said in Mahin v.

Whitney v. Mayo

15 Ill. 251 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1853

R. 239; Greenup v. Porter et al. 3 Scam. R. 65; Scott v. Moore et al. Ib. 315; Willis et al. v. Henderson, 4 Ib. 20 ; Spear v. Campbell et al. Ib. 426; Montgomery v. Brown, 2 Gilm. R. 581; Ho are v. … PL § 96 et seq.; Martin v. Dryden, 1 Gilm. R. 209; Montgomery v. Brown, 2 lb. 581. And in cases of voluntary associations, like this, equity will not sustain a bill by part, unless the others be made defendants?

In Re Chapman

69 Ill. 2d 494 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1978

Sayad Company v. … (See Brandes v. Illinois Protestant Children’s Home, Inc., 33 Ill. App. 2d 319 .)