Case law

West Chicago Park Commissioners v. Farber

171 Ill. 146 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1897

In Kuehner v. … In Guild v.

Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. People ex rel. McGough

197 Ill. 411 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1902

Stock Yards v. People ex rel. 127 Ill. 22 ; Chicago and Alton Railroad Co. v. People, 190 id. 20, and authorities there cited. … As is said in Chicago and Alton Railroad Co. v. People, supra, the requirement of the statute as to the time of meeting is mandatory.

Olympic Commissary Co. v. Industrial Commission

371 Ill. 164 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1939

(Decatur Railway and Light Co. v. Industrial Board , 276 Ill. 472 .) The test of the relationship is the right to control. … Hartley v. Red Ball Transit Co. 344 Ill. 534 ; LaMay v. Industrial Com. 292 id. 76; Meredosia Levee District v. Industrial Com. 285 id. 68. As was pointed out in Nelson Bros. Co. v.

People Ex Rel. Conner v. Burgess-Norton Manufacturing Co.

49 Ill. 2d 397 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1971

Bell v. New York Central R.R. … In Deal v.

People Ex Rel. Kramer v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

8 Ill. 2d 382 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1956

Brenza v. Chromium Corp. 3 Ill. 2d 271 ; People ex rel. Schlaeger v. Siebel, 388 Ill. 98 .) … Stevenson v.

The People v. Deatherage

401 Ill. 25 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 24, 1948

They cite Board of Education v. Blodgett, 155 Ill. 441 , to support their stand. The case is not in point. There, the board of education had issued bonds. … of board members.

Village of Crotty v. Domm

338 Ill. 228 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1930

In City of Ottawa v. … In City of Dallas City v.

St. Louis, Vandalia & Terre Haute Railroad v. Surell

88 Ill. 535 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1878

Co. v. Pollak, 75 Ill. 292 ; Ottawa Glass Co. v. McCaleb, 81 id. 556. Nor is there any force in the position that the State board , acted without evidence in fixing the value of the property of the company. … It was so held in The Pacific Hotel Co. v. Lieb, 83 Ill. 602 , and that case is decisive of this question, and the court so held in Porter v. Rockford, Rock Island and St. Louis R. R. Co. 76 Ill. 564 .

People ex rel. Mercer v. Zearing

305 Ill. 503 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1922

(People v. Givens, 123 Ill. 352 ; People v. Sandberg Co. 277 id. 567; People v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. 276 id. 208.) … In Howeard v.

People ex rel. Brockamp v. Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway Co.

260 Ill. 624 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1913

In the case of Wabash Railway Co. v. … Under the decision in People v.

Kilgallen v. City of Chicago

206 Ill. 557 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1903

In Bickerdike v. … In City of Sterling v.

County of Franklin v. Layman

145 Ill. 138 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1893

We are of opininon, that such proceedings were within the spirit of the statute, and that the county board had authority to enter into said contract. V. It is insisted that the contract was void for want of mutuality. … Aldrich v. Dunham, 16 Ill. 403 ; Devine v. Edwards, 101 id. 138; Davis v. Kenaga, 51 id. 170.

Coon v. Mason County

22 Ill. 666 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1859

The point made on this motion, was not considered by this court, in the cases of Hutchins v. De Witt County, 1 Gilm. R. 345, and The County of Sangamon v. Brown et al., 13 Ill. R. 207. The motion is sustained.

Reed v. Kusper

154 Ill. 2d 77 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1992

This is so, it insists, since in Anderson v. … In further support of its argument, the board cites to Black v. Cook County Officers Electoral Board (N.D. Ill. 1990), 750 F.

People v. Harris

Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 19, 2002

People v. Mahaffey , 194 Ill. 2d 154, 170 (2000); People v. Morgan , 187 Ill. 2d 500, 528 (1999). … With regard to Brown’s place of residence, defendant notes that Brown never stated that she was a resident of Hyde Park.

People v. Thomas

35 Ill. 2d 388 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 23, 1966

This case was submitted to us after Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 , 12 L. Ed. 2d 977 , but before its interpretation in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. … Under our views in People v. Hartgraves, 31 Ill.2d 375 , and People v. Kees, 32 Ill.2d 299 , which prevailed prior to Miranda and Johnson, there was no violation of the constitutional rights of this defendant.

Arvia v. Madigan

Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 15, 2004

See County of Kane v. Carlson , 116 Ill. 2d 186, 199 (1987); Board of Education of Rich Township High School District No. 227 v. Brown , 311 Ill. App. 3d 478, 488 (1999). … County of Knox , 188 Ill. 2d at 551-52 , citing Dubin v. Personnel Board , 128 Ill. 2d 490, 498-99 (1989).

People ex rel. McCall v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

248 Ill. 81 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1910

The principle of that decision was, that the proper corporate authority for levying a' tax to pay bonds and interest is the board of town auditors. And in Cincinnati, Indianapolis and Western Railway Co. v. … The same thing is true of a judgment against a town, and yet action by the board of town auditors is necessary for the levy of .a tax to pay a judgment. It was so decided in People ex rel. v.

Johnson v. County of Winnebago

256 Ill. 276 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1912

Section 1 of article 7 of the City Election act provides that “all expenses incurred by such board of election commissioners shall be paid by such city” as has adopted the act. In Bolles v. … In People v.

Burroughs v. Mortenson

312 Ill. 163 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1924

Vaccination is not a condition precedent to the right of a child to attend a public school, and cannot be made such condition either by a board of education or a board of health. (Potts v. Breen, 167 Ill. 67 ; People v. … Board of Education, supra; Hagler v. Larner, 284 Ill. 547 .) In People v.