Case law

People ex rel. Shipley v. Mays

117 Ill. 257 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1886

This precise objection was taken in the case of The People v. … In The People v.

People ex rel. Mason v. Reddick

181 Ill. 334 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1899

This report was on March 2 adopted by the board of trustees. … (People ex rel. v. Klokke, 92 Ill. 134 ; County of St. Clair v. People, 85 id. 396.) Their remedy was by action at law to recover the amount claimed, and not by mandamus.

People Ex Rel. Jones v. Brantley

45 Ill. 2d 335 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 20, 1970

And while it is mandatory for the Board to hear the application of one eligible for parole (People ex rel. Abner v. … Castle v.

Ruth v. Aurora Sanitary District

17 Ill. 2d 11 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 22, 1959

(Taylorville Sanitary District v. Winslow, 317 Ill. 25 ; Wilson v. Board of Trustees of the Sanitary District of Chicago, 133 Ill. 443 .) … Paul Railway Co. v. County of Lake, 287 Ill. 337 ; Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund v. Commissioners of Lincoln Park, 282 Ill. 348 ; City of Chicago v. Manhattan Cement Co. 178 Ill. 372 .)

People ex rel. Abt v. Bowman

253 Ill. 234 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1911

In People v. … In People v.

People ex rel. Hawkinson v. Mathews

282 Ill. 85 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1917

People v. Madison, 280 Ill. 96 ; People v. Dix, id. 158 ; People v. Howell, id. 477; People v. Fifer, id. 506; People v. Stitt, id. 553. … In support of the contention that this tax is void and cannot be validated by legislative act, appellant relies upon Marsh v. Chesnut, 14 Ill. 223 , Billings v. Detten, 15 id. 218, Conway v.

People ex rel. Little v. St. Louis Electric Bridge Co.

290 Ill. 307 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1919

Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Co. v. Cole, 75 Ill. 591 ; People’s Gas Light and Coke Co. v. Stuckart, 286 id. 164. … An assessment arbitrarily made by the board in violation of its own rules cannot be sustained. (Calumet and Chicago Canal and Dock Co. v. O’Connell, 265 Ill. 106 .)

Alton Manufacturing Co. v. Garrett Biblical Institute

243 Ill. 298 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1909

Moss v. Harpeth Academy, 7 Heisk 283; Hayward v. Pilgrim Society, 21 Pick. 270 . … Bank v.

People ex rel. Raymond v. Chicago & Alton Railroad

193 Ill. 364 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1901

Section 7 of the same article provides that the board shall make a certificate, to be signed by a majority of the board, specifying the nature of each claim or demand and to whom the amount is allowed, and shall cause such … Lower v. United States, 91 U. S. 536 ; Badger v. United States, 93 id. 599 ; High on Ex. Legal Rem. secs. 104, 377.

Pekin Loan Co. v. Soltermann

365 Ill. 460 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1937

In the other four cases the board assessed the tax-payer for omitted credits. Counsel rely upon the language found in Peirce v. … Fidelity Co. v. Board of Review, 264 Ill. 11 ; People v. Griffith, 245 id. 532.

People ex rel. Ballance v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

319 Ill. 366 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1925

This was the levy which the county board made, $16,225, and the rate was only fourteen cents. … People v. Vogt, 262 Ill. 170 ; People v. Chicago and Alton Railway Co. 289 id. 282 ; People v. New York Central Railroad Co. 296 id. 187 ; People v. Chicago and Eastern Illinois Railway Co. 310 id. 257 ; People v.

People Ex Rel. Town of Cicero v. Sweitzer

339 Ill. 28 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1930

(Meriwether v. Garrett, 102 U. S. 472 ; Rees v. City of Watertown, 86 id. 107; People v: Millard, 307 Ill. 556 ; Burton Stock Car Co. v. Traeger, 187 id. 9; Keokuk Bridge Co. v. People, 185 id. 276). … Heidenway v. Harding, 336 Ill. 606 ; County of Cook v. Columbia Ins. Co. 329 id. 189; Keokuk Bridge Co. v. People, supra; Beidler v. Kochersperger, 171 Ill. 563 ; People v.

City of Peoria v. Ohl

209 Ill. 52 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1904

(Bickerdike v. City of Chicago, 203 Ill. 636 .) … It is also said the record in the case of Gage v.

Scanlon v. Faitz

75 Ill. 2d 472 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1979

City of Des Plaines (1961), 21 Ill. 2d 157 ; City of El Paso v. Hoagland (1906), 224 Ill. 263 ; Richards v. City of Highland (1978), 59 Ill. App. 3d 692 ; City of Marseilles v. Hustis (1975), 27 Ill. … See White v. Board of Appeals (1970), 45 Ill. 2d 378, 381-82 ; Ganley v. City of Chicago (1974), 18 Ill. App. 3d 248 .

People ex rel. Edmands v. Henkle

256 Ill. 585 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1912

Lawrence v. Traner, 136 Ill. 474 ; St. Louis, Rock Island and Chicago Railroad Co. v. People, 177 id. 78. … This question was presented and passed upon in People v. Chicago and Illinois Midland Railway Co. (ante, p. 488,) and under the decision in that case the tax objected to under the third objection was not invalid.

People ex rel. Miller v. Illinois Central Railroad

266 Ill. 183 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1914

The board had authority to levy a county tax for roads. (People v. Kankakee and Seneca Railroad Co. 265 Ill. 497 ; People v. Jacksonville and St. Louis Railroad Co. 265 id. 550 .) … (People v. Cincinnati, Indianapolis and Western Railway Co. 224 Ill. 523 ; People v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Co. 231 id. 209; People v. Vogt, 262 id. 170.)

City of Bloomington v. Reeves

177 Ill. 161 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1898

(Adams County v. City of Quincy, 130 Ill. 566 .) … or board of trustees, as the case may be.”

Chicago & Milwaukee Electric Railway Co. v. Vollman

213 Ill. 609 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1905

And in Kimball v. … And in Huling v.

People ex rel. Thompson v. Bourne

242 Ill. 61 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1909

(Keokuk and Hamilton Bridge Co. v. People, 145 Ill. 596 .) The fact of over-valuation will not, of itself, establish fraud. (Spring Valley Coal Co. v. People, 157 Ill. 543 ; Burton Stock Car Co. v. Traeger, 187 id. 9.) … In State Board of Equalization v.

People Ex Rel. Ferguson v. National Plate Glass Co.

332 Ill. 599 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1928

(Weber v. Baird, 208 Ill. 209 .) The board in making assessments is required to make a list of the property assessed, setting down in the column opposite the certain kinds of property the assessed value thereof. … The board has no authority to assess a lump sum as the value of all the property without any description of the character and kind of it. (People v. Grant, 271 Ill. 523 ; Holt v. Hendee, 248 id. 288; Carney v.