Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersill

10,000+ results

0.84s

  • People v. Elston

    231 Ill. 215 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1907

    An identical question arose in Commonwealth v. Brown, 12 Gray, 135 , where Brown and Peach were indicted for being common sellers of intoxicating liquors “in a building then and there used by them as a shop.” … Counsel for Brown asked an instruction to the effect that Brown could not be convicted without proof that the building was kept by both Brown and Peach, as alleged in the indictment.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kirk v. Vonberg

    34 Ill. 440 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1864

    Bustard v. Morrison, 1 Scam. 235 . And in that case it was also held that the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court is limited to the county in which the judgment is rendered, and no lien attaches beyond its limits. … Rogers v. Dickey, 1 Gilm. 636 . There appears to be no error-in this record, and the judgment of the court below is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Chief Judge of 16th Judicial Cir. v. State Labor R. Bd.

    178 Ill. 2d 333 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 11, 1997

    See National Labor Relations Board v. Yeshiva University, 444 U.S. 672, 682 , 63 L. Ed. 2d 115,125 , 100 S. Ct. 856, 862 (1980); National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co. … In Salaried Employees of North America (SENA) v. Illinois Local Labor Relations Board, 202 Ill.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Page v. Brant

    18 Ill. 37 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1856

    Sec. 408; Astor v. Wells, 4 Wheaton R. 466 ; Hiem v. Mill, 13 Vesey R. 114; Morrison v. Prim, Breese R. 33; Rector v. Rector, 3 Gil. R. 119; Doyle v. Teas, 4 Scam. R. 250. … Brown and Wyman were ostensible, open members of the firm of Page and.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Marsh v. People

    226 Ill. 464 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1907

    (County of Cook v. Gilbert, 146 Ill. 268 .) … The member selected chairman of the board is merely its presiding officer and otherwise has no superior powers to any other member of the board. (Bouton v. Mc-Donough County, 84 Ill. 384 ; Scates v. King, 110 id. 456 .)

    Overruled in part, on other grounds by The People v. Lieber, 357 Ill. 423 (1934)Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Launius v. BD. OF FIRE & POLICE COM'RS OF CITY OF DES PLAINES

    151 Ill. 2d 419 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 24, 1992

    Board of Fire & Police Commissioners (1983), 96 Ill. 2d 101, 105 , quoting Fantozzi v. Board of Fire & Police Commissioners (1963), 27 Ill. 2d 357, 360 .) … Wilson v. Board of Fire & Police Commissioners (1990), 205 Ill. App. 3d 984, 992 ; see also Basketfield v. Daniel (1979), 71 Ill.

    Cited 115 timesPublished
  • Marx v. People

    204 Ill. 248 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1903

    Proc. sec. 795; People v. Goldstein, 32 Cal. 432 ; State v. Walker, 22 La. 425 ; Green v. Commonwealth, 94 Mass. (12 Allen,) 155. … (Brown v. State, 13 Ark. 96 ; In re Brown, 32 Cal. 48 ; People v. Noll, 20 id. 164 ; Barton v. People, 88 id. 176 ; Ex parte Wood, 41 Pac. Rep. 796 .) In Brown v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • People v. Sturgis

    58 Ill. 2d 211 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1974

    Relying principally on Simmons v. United States (1968), 390 U.S. 377 , 19 L. Ed. 2d 1247 , 88 S. Ct. 967 , Brown v. United States (1973), 411 U.S. 223 , 36 L. Ed. 2d 208 , 93 S. Ct. 1565 , and People v. … We believe that Simmons and Brown must be construed in harmony with Harris v. New York (1971), 401 U.S. 222 , 28 L. Ed. 2d 1 , 91 S.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Michael v. City of Mattoon

    172 Ill. 394 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1898

    We think it was entirely proper to permit the affidavit to be amended, and in principle have so held in Brown v. City of Joliet, 22 Ill. 123 , City of Chicago v. Walker, 24 id. 494, and Kilmer v. … Linck v. City of Litchfield, 141 Ill. 469 ; Schemick v. City of Chicago, 151 id. 336; Gordon v. People ex rel. 154 id. 664.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Sartison v. Schmidt

    281 Ill. 211 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1917

    Lieb, 85 Ill. 484 , cited with approval Brown v. hunt, 37 Me. 428 , where a de facto officer is described as one who actually performs the duties of the office with apparent right, under claim or color of appointment or election … A discussion of the different views on this question is found in the majority and minority opinions of the Supreme Court of Michigan on this subject in Board of Auditors v. Benoit, 20 Mich. 176 .

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Henderson v. Davisson

    157 Ill. 379 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1895

    Parks v. Brown, 16 Ill. 454 . Possession of the note is prima facie evidence of ownership, and a payee or endorsee in possession may recover, notwithstanding an endorsement of his name on the back thereof. (Gillham v. … Parks v. Brown, 16 Ill. 454 ; Richards v. Darst, 51 id. 140; Humphreyville v. Culver, Page, Hoyne & Co. 73 id. 485; Palmer v. Gardiner, supra; Best v. Nokomis Nat. Bank, supra.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • The People v. Scalisi

    324 Ill. 131 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1926

    (Hawk v. Ridgway, 33 Ill. 473 .) In Board of Trustees v. … Rafferty v. People, 69 Ill. 111 ; Same v. Same, 72 id. 37; People v. Brown, 288 id. 489; People v. Bissett, 246 id. 516; Briggs v. Commonwealth, 82 Va. 554 ; Commonwealth v. Carey, 66 Mass. 246 ; State v.

    Cited 55 timesPublished
  • Bolander v. Peterson

    11 L.R.A. 350 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1891

    In Canal Co. v. … Choynski v. Cohen, 39 Cal. 501 ; Brown on Trade-Marks, sec. 161.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Prazen v. Shoop

    2013 IL 115035 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 24, 2013

    Board of Education, Joliet Township High School District No. 204 v. Board of Education, Lincoln Way Community High School District No. 210, 231 Ill. 2d 184, 194 (2008); Hooker v. … Roselle Police Pension Board v. Village of Roselle, 232 Ill. 2d 546, 552 (2009).

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Pease v. Frank

    263 Ill. 500 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1914

    This court considered the effect of such an interpretation •of a statute not distinguishable from this one, in Brown v. Niles, 16 Ill. 385 . … (Young v. Campbell, 5 Gilm. 80 ; Davidson v. Burke, 143 Ill. 139 .)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • The People v. Baker

    26 Ill. 2d 484 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1962

    The defendant in his brief relies upon People v. Maynard, 347 Ill. 422 ; Brown v. People, 8 Ill.2d 540 ; and People v. … Burson, 11 Ill.2d 360 ; and, unlike Brown v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • The PEOPLE v. Miller

    30 Ill. 2d 110 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1964

    (People v. Solomon, 24 Ill.2d 586 ; People v. Pride, 16 Ill.2d 82 ; People v. Renallo, 410 Ill. 372 .) … did have a brown leather jacket.”

    Cited 87 timesPublished
  • People v. McKibbins

    96 Ill. 2d 176 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 18, 1983

    People v. Cole (1963), 29 Ill. 2d 501, 505 ; People v. Dewey (1969), 42 Ill. 2d 148, 157 ; People v. McDonald (1975), 62 Ill. 2d 448, 455 . … People v. Spates (1979), 77 Ill. 2d 193 ; People v. Ray (1973), 54 Ill. 2d 377 ; People v. Montgomery (1971), 47 Ill. 2d 510 .

    Cited 250 timesPublished
  • Preston v. Lloyd

    269 Ill. 152 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1915

    (Lines v. Willey, 253 Ill. 440 ; McCormick v. Miller, 102, id. 208.) … Quisenberry, 132 Ill. 385 , Dickie v. Carter, 42 id. 376, Francis v. Wilkinson, 147 id. 370, and Sargent v. Roberts, 265 id. 210.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wisner v. People ex rel. Kern

    156 Ill. 180 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1895

    The ordinance is similar, in that respect, to that in the case of Stanton v. … On the authority of Browning v. City of Chicago, 155 Ill. 314 , it must be held that it is not error to enter more than one judgment in a proceeding for special assessment to pay for a proposed improvement.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.