Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersflsd

4,340 results

2.48s

  • Woodburn v. State of Florida Department of Children & Family Services

    859 F. Supp. 2d 1305 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Apr 17, 2012

    German v. Broward Cnty. Sheriff’s Office, 439 Fed.Appx. 867, 869-70 (11th Cir.2011) (quoting Hartley v. Parnell, 193 F.3d 1263, 1269 (11th Cir.1999)). … German v. Broward Cnty. Sheriffs Office, 439 Fed.Appx. 867, 870 (11th Cir.2011) (quoting Brown v. Crawford, 906 F.2d 667, 671 (11th Cir.1990)).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Musiker v. Projectavision, Inc.

    960 F. Supp. 292 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Mar 25, 1997

    See McLean Financial Corp. v. … See Jasper v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Laplante v. Terraces of Lake Worth Rehabilitation & Health Center, LLC

    725 F. Supp. 2d 1358 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Apr 13, 2010

    . § 207 (a)(1); Allen v. Board of Public Educ. for Bibb Cty., 495 F.3d 1306, 1314 (11th Cir.2007). “A person is employed if he or she is suffered or permitted to work. … See Ealy-Simon v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • City of Miami v. Metropolitan Dade County

    745 F. Supp. 683 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Sep 12, 1990

    V. … See also Bludworth v. Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc., supra; Tribune Co. v. Public Records, supra; Downs v. Austin, 522 So.2d 931 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gainsburg v. The Florida Bar

    District Court, S.D. Florida · Jun 13, 2024

    Court of Florida had “confirmed the [Board’s] recommendation and admitted [the plaintiff] to the Florida Bar[.]” Ibid. … Because amendment of claims that are barred by res judicata “would be futile,” Haney v. Abdallah, 2013 WL 5313402, at *3 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 20, 2013) (Marra, J.); see also Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Harrington

    District Court, S.D. Florida · Jul 17, 2026

    In connection with that application, the Florida Board of Bar Examiners (the “Board”) held a formal hearing on “specifications” it had issued to Plaintiff. See ECF No. [1-2]; ECF No. [68] at 5 & n.1. … an “accurate transcript,” as the Board hired Defendant to do, see ECF No. [92] at 2.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Johnson v. Carnival Corporation

    District Court, S.D. Florida · Nov 6, 2020

    Defendant relies upon the Declaration of Suzanne Brown Vazquez, ECF No. [59-1] (“Declaration”), the Director of Guest Claims & Staff Counsel for Carnival Cruise Line. … Defendant’s reliance on Eisenberg v. Carnival Corporation, No. 07-22058-CIV, 2008 WL 2946029, at *2 (S.D. Fla. July 7, 2008) and Iaquinto v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rosen v. J.M. Auto Inc.

    270 F.R.D. 675 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jan 26, 2009

    Washington v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 959 F.2d 1566, 1569 (11th Cir.1992). … Kl ay v. Humana, Inc., 382 F.3d 1241, 1254 (11th Cir.2004). The court’s inquiry is typically focused on “whether there are common liability issues which may be resolved efficiently on a class-wide basis.” Brown v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Gill

    District Court, S.D. Florida · Mar 23, 2026

    McDowell v. Brown, 392 F.3d 1283, 1289 (11th Cir. 2004) (citing City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 388 (1989)). … Brown v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 923 F.2d 1474, 1481 (11th Cir. 1991) (cleaned up) (quoting St. Louis v. Praprotnik, 485 U.S. 112 (1988)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Villanueva Castellanos v. BJ's Wholesale Club Inc

    District Court, S.D. Florida · Aug 15, 2024

    In Fabre v. … Brown v. Wright National Flood Company, No. 18-cv-10034-KMM, 2018 WL 7291069, at *3 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 13, 2018).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Pica Services, Inc. v. Behringer

    593 F. Supp. 113 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jul 20, 1984

    Snowden v. Hughes, 321 U.S. 1 , 64 S.Ct. 397 , 88 L.Ed. 497 (1944); Smith v. Georgia, 684 F.2d 729 (11th Cir.1982); Jackson v. Marine Exploration Co., Inc., 583 F.2d 1336 (5th Cir.1978). … The seminal case discussing what constitutes a property right was Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance v. Chabad House of North Dade, Inc.

    771 F. Supp. 2d 1336 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Mar 21, 2011

    The Court finds persuasive the Eleventh Circuit’s guidance regarding the disjunctive in Brown v. … Co. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Accelerant Specialty Insurance Company v. Santana Management, LLC

    District Court, S.D. Florida · Sep 3, 2025

    P. 55(a); Mitchell v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 294 F.3d 1309, 1316 (11th Cir. 2002). The effect of a clerk’s default is that all of the plaintiff’s well-pled allegations are deemed admitted. See Buchanan v. … Co., Ltd. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Weinberger v. Navarro

    957 F. Supp. 220 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Mar 14, 1997

    Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist., 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968))). … Id. at 1563 ; see Cummings v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Palmer Trinity Private School, Inc. v. Village of Palmetto Bay

    802 F. Supp. 2d 1322 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jul 29, 2011

    Moheb, Inc. v. City of Miami, 756 F.Supp.2d 1370, 1372-73 (S.D.Fla.2010) (Gold, J.). A. … By its terms, the purpose of Section 2-106 is “to eliminate the presumption of prejudice that may result from ex parte communications with village council and board members.” Village Mun.Code § 2-106(a).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Home Quality Management, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance

    381 F. Supp. 2d 1363 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jul 1, 2005

    Volt Information Sciences, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior Univ., 489 U.S. 468, 478 , 109 S.Ct. 1248 , 103 L.Ed.2d 488 (1989). A. … Servs. v. Saldukas, 851 So.2d 853, 856 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Benedict v. Pensacola Motor Sales, Inc., 846 So.2d 1238, 1240 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lucas v. Florida Power & Light Co.

    575 F. Supp. 552 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Oct 31, 1983

    The Board wished to keep open its option to redeem and to await the PSC’s rate order. … Shores v. Sklar, at 468. 5.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Walters v. American Coach Lines of Miami, Inc.

    569 F. Supp. 2d 1270 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jul 29, 2008

    In Baez v. … Co. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • United States v. Arriva Medical, LLC

    District Court, S.D. Florida · Apr 2, 2025

    See Chudasama v. … Kellogg Brown & Root Srvs., Inc. v. United States ex rel. Carter, 575 U.S. 650, 662 (2015) (cleaned up). “[A] qui tam suit under the FCA ceases to be ‘pending’ once it is dismissed.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Moore, John III v. Oliver

    District Court, S.D. Florida · Jul 30, 2025

    White v. … Brown, 58 F.4th 1347, 1357 (11th Cir. 2023) (en banc).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.