Case law

Tutor Time Child Care Systems, Inc. v. Franks Investment Group, Inc.

966 F. Supp. 1188 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jun 4, 1997

In Hanna v. … Brown, 307 F.2d 306, 308 (5th Cir.1962), the court held that the purpose of Rule 9(g) is “to inform defending parties as to the nature of the damages claimed in order to avoid surprise.”

Hudson v. Chertoff

473 F. Supp. 2d 1279 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Feb 12, 2007

(citing Maniccia v. Brown, 171 F.3d 1364, 1369 (11th Cir.1999)). But see, Parris v. Miami Herald Publishing Co., 216 F.3d 1298 , 1301 (11th Cir.2000)(three elements for retaliation claim excluding number two). … See Saunders v.

BankUnited Financial Corp. v. Federal Deposit Insurance

436 B.R. 216 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Aug 20, 2010

See Browning v. … See Emerald Int’l Invs., Inc. v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.

Sexual MD Solutions, LLC v. Wolff

District Court, S.D. Florida · May 28, 2020

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 20-20824-CIV-O’SULLIVAN [CONSENT] SEXUAL MD SOLUTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff, V. … Brown v. Advantage Eng’g, Inc., 960 F.2d 1013, 1016 (11th Cir. 1992) (noting that “[i]t [was] immaterial whether the sealing of the record [was] an integral part of a negotiated settlement between the parties.”).

Response Oncology, Inc. v. MetraHealth Insurance

978 F. Supp. 1052 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jul 29, 1997

Conley v. … Ellen S. v. The Florida Board of Bar Examiners, 859 F.Supp. 1489, 1492 (S.D.Fla.1994); Olpin v.

duPont Walston, Inc. v. EF Hutton & Company, Inc.

368 F. Supp. 306 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Nov 30, 1973

Only the First and Tenth Circuits have considered the issue, the First Circuit in Atlantic Heel Co. v. Allied Heel Co., 284 F.2d 879, 885 (1960), and Albert Pick-Barth Co. v. … Rogers v. Douglas Tobacco Board of Trade, Inc., 266 F.2d 636, 644 (5th Cir. 1959). More recently, in Cherokee Laboratories, Inc. v.

Isbell v. DM Records, Inc.

529 B.R. 793 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Mar 26, 2015

In re Brown, No. 6:08-cv-1517-Orl-18DAB, 2008 WL 5050081 , at *2 (M.D.Fla. Nov. 19, 2008) (citing In re Piper Aircraft Corp., 244 F.3d 1289, 1295 (11th Cir.2001)). … Compare Denham v. Shellman Grain Elevator, Inc., 444 F.2d 1376 , 1379 (5th Cir.1971), with In re Okamoto, 491 F.2d 496 (9th Cir.1974); Theis v.

In Re Sinaltrainal Litigation

474 F. Supp. 2d 1273 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Sep 29, 2006

In June of 1995, the local union elected a new executive board to replace the one that had fled, and Isidro Gil was elected as a member of this new board. Id. at ¶ 36. … That individual asked Leal if he was a member of the union, and of the executive board of the union. Id.

Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.

22 F. Supp. 3d 1240 · District Court, S.D. Florida · May 23, 2014

Fridovich, 598 So.2d at 70 ; see also Brown v. Suncoast Beverage Sales, LLP, No. 2:09—cv-498-FtM-29DN F, 2010 WL 555675 , at *3 (M.D.Fla. … Bannon, 156 U.S. at 466 , 15 S.Ct. 467 (alterations added) (citing Mackin, 117 U.S. at 350 , 6 S.Ct. 777 ); Brown v.

Walter v. The Montgomery

29 F. Cas. 113 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Mar 7, 1840

The brig was found deserted at sea, by the master of the brig Ceres, who pui on board of her his mate and two mariners. … Rowe v. The Brig [Case No. 12,093].

Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. v. Bright Mountain Media, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Florida · Jul 14, 2025

The court may apply either “an hour-by-hour analysis” or “an across-the-board reduction of the requested compensable hours”—“not both.” Bivins v. Wrap It Up, Inc., 548 F.3d 1348, 1351 (11th Cir. 2008). … “If the court concludes that the number of claimed hours is excessive, it may engage in ‘an across-the-board cut,’ so long as it provides adequate explanation for the decrease.” Galdames v. N & D Inv. Corp., 432 F.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Doherty Enterprises, Inc.

126 F. Supp. 3d 1305 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Sep 1, 2015

.”); EEOC v. … To the extent Defendant reads EEOC v. Board of Pub.

Tomasini v. MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER OF FLORIDA, INC.

315 F. Supp. 2d 1252 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Feb 20, 2004

Watson Clinic, LLP v. … Heath & Son, Inc. v. AT & T Info. Sys. Inc., 9 F.3d 561, 567 (7th Cir.1993); see also Skotak v. Tenneco Resins, Inc., 953 F.2d 909 , 916 n. 7 (5th Cir.1992); Lawrence v.

Glanton v. United States

District Court, S.D. Florida · Sep 22, 2022

Brown v. United States, 942 F.3d 1069, 1075 (11th Cir. 2019) (“Davis, as we have mentioned, struck down the residual clause as unconstitutionally vague. … Brown, 942 F.3d at 1075 (“It’s worth emphasizing that Brown pled guilty to conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery, not substantive Hobbs Act robbery, a crime we have previously held constitutes a crime of violence under

Liberty Mut. Ins. v. AVENTURA ENGINEERING & CONST.

534 F. Supp. 2d 1290 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jan 8, 2008

Co. v. … V.

Lee v. Ridgdill

444 F. Supp. 44 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Oct 31, 1977

See, Canal Authority v. … v.

Shell Oil Co. v. A.Z. Services, Inc.

990 F. Supp. 1406 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Feb 13, 1997

See, e.g., Amadeo v. Mobil Oil Caribe, Inc., 642 F.Supp. 962, 964 (D.P.R.1986) (“otherwise proper notice will not be rendered invalid for failure to include a summary statement”); Brown v. … Grotem-eyer, 749 F.Supp. at 888 ; Amadeo, 642 F.Supp. at 964 ; Brown, 617 F.Supp. at 574 ; Martin, 602 F.Supp. at 63 .

Smith v. Carnival Corporation

District Court, S.D. Florida · Jun 30, 2025

In Brown v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd., the Court struck an opinion given by Dr. Suite during his deposition, which had not been stated in his expert report, nor in any supplemental or rebuttal report. 190 F. … See Jones v.

Douglas N. Higgins, Inc. v. Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority

565 F. Supp. 126 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jun 21, 1983

See, Three Rivers Cablevision v. City of Pittsburgh, 502 F.Supp. 1118 (W.D.Pa.1980); Kendrick v. City Council of Augusta, Georgia, 516 F.Supp. 1134 (S.D.Ga.1981); Teleprompter of Erie, Inc. v. … The Court began the discussion of the plaintiff’s due process claim under section 1983 by referring to the “entitlement doctrine” as articulated in Board of Regents v.

Rossbach v. Rundle

128 F. Supp. 2d 1348 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Feb 7, 2000

See Doe v. … See Washington v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 959 F.2d 1566, 1570 (11th Cir.1992) (“[discovery should be tailored to the issues in the particular case”).