Case law

Kreitmeyer v. Baldwin Drainage Dist.

2 F. Supp. 208 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Dec 30, 1932

Moreover, in Hollander v. Hoaslip (C. C. … Hall v. Otterson, 52 N. J. Eq. 522, 28 A. 907 , 912; Board of Com’rs of Cass County v. Plotner, 149 Ind. 116 , 48 N. E. 635 ; Lowndes v. Wicks, 69 Conn. 15 , 36 A. 1072 ; 2 Pomeroy’s Eq. Juris. (3d Ed.) § 965.

Pastrana v. United States

670 F. Supp. 954 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Oct 8, 1987

On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, in Pastrana v. … United States v. Potamkin Cadillac Corporation, 689 F.2d 379, 381 (2nd Cir.1982), citing Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp., 613 F.2d 438, 445 (2d Cir.1980).

United States v. Perraud

672 F. Supp. 2d 1328 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Dec 1, 2009

their complaint before the Labor Board completed its investigation, and the Labor Board took no further action upon the individuals’ withdrawal of their complaint. … Kelley, 36 F.3d 1118, 1127 (D.C.Cir.1994); Sutton, 732 F.2d at 1490 ; Leo, 941 F.2d at 199 ; Fruchtman, 421 F.2d at 1021 ; United States v. Browning, Inc., 572 F.2d 720, 724 (10th Cir.1978).

Kleiman v. Wright

District Court, S.D. Florida · May 26, 2020

Brown v. Advantage Eng’g., Inc., 960 F.2d 1013, 1016 (11th Cir. 1992). See also S.D. Fla. … Newman v. Graddick, 696 F.2d 796, 802–03 (11th Cir.1983); see also Brown, 960 F.2d at 1015– 16 (11th Cir.1992); Wilson v. American Motors Corp., 759 F.2d 1568, 1571 (11th Cir.1992).

Kleiman v. Wright

District Court, S.D. Florida · May 12, 2020

Brown v. Advantage Eng’g., Inc., 960 F.2d 1013, 1016 (11th Cir. 1992). See also S.D. Fla. … Newman v. Graddick, 696 F.2d 796, 802–03 (11th Cir.1983); see also Brown, 960 F.2d at 1015– 16 (11th Cir.1992); Wilson v. American Motors Corp., 759 F.2d 1568, 1571 (11th Cir.1992).

Thermal Technologies, Inc. v. Dade Service Corp.

282 F. Supp. 2d 1373 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Aug 22, 2003

See Brown v. Connecticut Gen. Life Ins. … In Iragorri v.

Barquin v. Monty's Sunset, L.L.C.

975 F. Supp. 2d 1309 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Oct 2, 2013

Wolf v. Coca-Cola, 200 F.3d 1337 , 1342-1343 (11th Cir.2000). … (internal citation omitted); Brown v. Triton Sec., 2005 WL 2708914 , *5 (E.D.Va.

Parness v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

291 F. Supp. 2d 1347 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Aug 13, 2003

C at 13.5); see also Brown v. … See Jett v.

ITL International Inc. v. Walton & Post, Inc.

741 F. Supp. 2d 1313 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Sep 29, 2010

Turner Entertainment Co. v. Degeto Film, 25 F.3d 1512 , 1518 (11th Cir.1994). … Ungaro-Benages v. Dresdner Bank AG, 379 F.3d 1227, 1228 (11th Cir.2004).

Pugh v. Rainwater

465 F. Supp. 41 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jan 3, 1979

In Beazer v. … Brown v. Culpepper, 559 F.2d 274 (5th Cir. 1977). Consequently, examining awards in similar cases, while instructive, is not dis-positive. This Court finds most compelling the caveats contained in Johnson v.

Hackney v. Fahs

62 F. Supp. 926 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Oct 24, 1945

This cogent reason has been recognized and approved by the Board of Tax Appeals in several cases; the latest called to the Court’s attention being White, Executor, v. Commissioner, 21 B.T.A. 500 .

Acosta v. Norwegian Cruise Line, Ltd.

303 F. Supp. 2d 1327 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Dec 12, 2003

Moreover, Section 2 of Plaintiffs contract, like other POEA-approved contracts, incorporated by reference the Standard Employment Terms and Conditions Governing the Employment of Filipino Seafarers On Board Ocean-Going Vessels … E.g., Shearson/American Exp., Inc. v. McMahon, 482 U.S. 220, 226 , 107 S.Ct. 2332 , 96 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987); Weeks v. Harden Mfg. Corp., 291 F.3d 1307 (11th Cir.2002).

Resmondo v. United States

536 F. Supp. 19 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jun 3, 1981

The subject just discussed has been elaborately treated by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in the following cases: United States v. Chapman, 559 F.2d 402 (5th Cir. 1977); Mason v. … Pulliam, 557 F.2d 426 (5th Cir. 1977); Richey v. Smith, 515 F.2d 1239 (5th Cir. 1975); United States v. Mekjian, 505 F.2d 1320 , (5th Cir. 1975); Hunsucker v. Phinney, 497 F.2d 29 (5th Cir. 1974).

Maplewood Partners, L.P. v. Indian Harbor Insurance

295 F.R.D. 550 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jul 16, 2013

Co. v. … Glaser and [counsel] are bringing that advice to the AMC board of directors....

United States v. Mayr

350 F. Supp. 1291 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Nov 16, 1972

The evidence against the defendants brings the case within the ambit of Benchwick v. United States, supra, and Swingle v. … See, e. g., United States v. Gray, 462 F.2d 164 (5th Cir. 1972); United States v. Sims, 434 F.2d 258 (5th Cir. 1970).

Lancaster v. Carnival Corp.

85 F. Supp. 3d 1341 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Feb 9, 2015

Aronson v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc., 30 F.Supp.3d 1379, 1392 (S.D.Fla.2014). On the other hand, there is no duty to warn passengers of open and obvious dangers. Cohen v. … See Keefe v.

Kleiman v. Wright

District Court, S.D. Florida · Jun 3, 2020

Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555, 564–74 (1980)). “Once a matter is brought before a court for resolution, it is no longer solely the parties’ case, but also the public’s case.” Brown v. … Newman v. Graddick, 696 F.2d 796, 802–03 (11th Cir.1983); see also Brown, 960 F.2d at 1015– 16 (11th Cir.1992); Wilson v. American Motors Corp., 759 F.2d 1568, 1571 (11th Cir.1992).

Collins v. Miami-Dade County

361 F. Supp. 2d 1362 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Feb 7, 2005

See also Maniccia v. Brown, 171 F.3d 1364 , 1370 n. 3 (11th Cir.1999) (finding no adverse employment action where the employee admitted that she lost no pay or benefits as a result of her transfer). Ms. … Perkins v. School Board of Pinellas County, 902 F.Supp. 1503, 1506-7 (M.D.Fla.1995) (citing McDonald v.

Marrari v. Medical Staffing Network Holdings, Inc.

395 F. Supp. 2d 1169 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Sep 27, 2005

Litig. v. Kraftsow, 890 F.2d 628 , 640 (3d Cir.1989); Panter v. Marshall Field & Co., 646 F.2d 271, 289 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1092 , 102 S.Ct. 658 , 70 L.Ed.2d 631 (1981); see also Cutsforth v. … See Brown v. Enstar *1181 Group, Inc., 84 F.3d 393, 396-97 (11th Cir.1996) (holding that if there is no primary violation of Section 11, then there can be no vicarious liability under Section 15).

Jean-Francois

District Court, S.D. Florida · Sep 14, 2026

.”); McCormick v. … I, L.P. v.