Case law

County Waste, Inc. v. United States

752 F. Supp. 449 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Dec 12, 1990

Management Science America, Inc. v. … .”); United States v. St.

Morse v. CITY FEDERAL SAV. & LOAN ASS'N

567 F. Supp. 699 · District Court, S.D. Florida · May 11, 1983

. § 545.8-3 (f) (1982) was issued pursuant to the authority of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board to promulgate rules and regulations for the organization, incorporation examination, operation and regulation of federally chartered … Brownson v. Hannah, 93 Fla. 223 , 111 So. 731 (1927). An express provision for the mortgage “to be assumed and paid” by the purchaser is sufficient to form a contract of assumption. Riddle v.

Engle v. Royal Bahamain Association, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Florida · Jan 6, 2021

Armor Screen Corp. v. Storm Catcher, Inc., 709 F. Supp. 2d 1309, 1310 (S.D. Fla. 2010) (emphasis added) (citing Norton v. … In re BellSouth Corp., 334 F.3d at 961; see also Jawhbs, LLC v. Arevalo, 224 F. Supp. 2d 1296, 1299 (S.D. Fla. 2016) (citing Metrahealth Ins. Co. v. Ancote Psychiatric Hosp., Ltd., 961 F. Supp. 1580, 1582 (M.D.

Rivers v. Health Options Connect, Inc.

96 F. Supp. 2d 1370 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Feb 29, 2000

Cynthia Ransburg-Brown, The Ultimate Jigsaw Puzzle: Erisa Preemption and Liability in the Utilization Review Process, 28 Cumb. L.Rev. 403 (1997-98). … In Crum v.

United States v. Bogle

689 F. Supp. 1121 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jun 25, 1988

Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 , 513 n. 6, 85 S.Ct. 1678 , 1698 n. 6, 14 L.Ed.2d 510 (1965) (Black, J., dissenting); West Virginia State Board of Education v. … Similarly, in Hobson v. Hansen, 265 F.Supp. 902 (D.D.C.1967), a three-judge court found constitutional legislation empowering the district court to appoint members of the District of Columbia School Board.

Balogh's of Coral Gables, Inc. v. Getz

510 F. Supp. 741 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Mar 19, 1981

Northern Pacific Railway Company, 356 U.S. 1 , 78 S.Ct. 514 , 2 L.Ed.2d 545 ; Chicago Board of Trade v. United States, 246 U.S. 231 , 38 S.Ct. 242 , 62 L.Ed. 683 (1918); Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. … Chicago Board of Trade, 246 U.S. at 238 , 38 S.Ct. at 243 . This “rule of reason” is the general standard by which an alleged violation of section 1 is to be judged.

Zurich American Insurance v. Frankel Enterprises, Inc.

509 F. Supp. 2d 1303 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Aug 28, 2007

Perez, We conclude that the summary judgment was improvidently entered in favor of the Browns, and that American Reliance is entitled to judgment in its favor. As stated in First American Title Insurance Co. v. … Co. v.

Felicia v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.

286 F.R.D. 667 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Nov 9, 2012

U.S. v. 58.16 Acres of Land, 66 F.R.D. 570, 573 (E.D.Ill. 1975); Eglin Federal Credit Union v. Cantor, Fitzgerald Securities Corp., 91 F.R.D. 414 (N.D.Ga.1981). … Campos revealed that the injury investigation reporting system on-board the ship did not contain Ms. Biggs’ name. Ms.

Table Supply Stores, Inc. v. Hawking

9 F. Supp. 888 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jan 23, 1935

district of Florida, and one of the respondents, through a secret investigation, procured affidavits and forwarded the same to another respondent, whereupon the other respondent made a report to the Regional Compliance Board … See Purvis v. Bazemore, 5 F. Supp. 230 . No written opinions filed in other cases.

Powers v. Target Corporation

District Court, S.D. Florida · Apr 27, 2020

Levine, 2010 WL 2612579, at *1 (citing Brown v. Best Foods, 169 F.R.D. 385, 388 (N.D. Ala. 1996)). In this case, Plaintiff’s Expert Witness Disclosure explains that Dr. Das’s and Dr. … (citing Sellers, 906 F.2d at 603; United States v. Brown, 603 (11th Cir. 1987); United States v. Cathey, 591 F.2d 268, 275 (5th Cir. 1979)).

United States v. Wilk

366 F. Supp. 2d 1178 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Apr 27, 2005

United States v. Breeden, 366 F.3d 369, 374 (4th Cir.2004); United States v. Ponder, 347 F.Supp.2d 256, 263 (E.D.Va.2004). B. … Similarly, in United States v.

Lancaster v. Carnival Corp.

85 F. Supp. 3d 1341 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Feb 9, 2015

Aronson v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc., 30 F.Supp.3d 1379, 1392 (S.D.Fla.2014). On the other hand, there is no duty to warn passengers of open and obvious dangers. Cohen v. … See Keefe v.

Royal Bahamian Ass'n, Inc. v. Qbe Ins. Corp.

744 F. Supp. 2d 1297 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Sep 28, 2010

O’Rourke v. Hayes, 378 F.3d 1201, 1210 (11th Cir.2004). See also LaCrosse v. … See also Williams v. Board of Cnty. Comm’rs of the Unified Gov’t of Wyandotte Cnty. & Kan.

Papavaritis v. Communication Workers of America

772 F. Supp. 604 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Aug 30, 1991

See, e.g., Riley v. … Seymour v.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Pettegrove Truck Service, Inc.

716 F. Supp. 1430 · District Court, S.D. Florida · May 4, 1989

Dumas v. Town of Mt. … E.E.O.C. v. First Catholic Slovak Ladies Ass’n, 694 F.2d 1068 (6th Cir.1982); Hishon v.

Barash v. Kates

585 F. Supp. 2d 1368 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Oct 23, 2008

See Chambers v. … .”); Scelta v.

Dalack v. VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, FLORIDA

434 F. Supp. 2d 1336 · District Court, S.D. Florida · May 25, 2006

In Cramp v. … See also, Wkitehill v. Elkins, 389 U.S. 54 , 88 S.Ct. 184 , 19 L.Ed.2d 228 (1967); Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967).

Mumford v. Carnival Corp.

7 F. Supp. 3d 1243 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Mar 18, 2014

After diagnosing the stroke, the ship’s doctor indicated that he could not use “clot-buster drugs which he had on-board because he did not have the proper medical equipment onboard, such as a CT scan machine, to determine … See, e.g., Gavigan v.

Dartland v. Metropolitan Dade County

717 F. Supp. 1544 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jul 31, 1989

Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1734-35 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). … Smith v. United States, 502 F.2d 512, 517 (5th Cir.1974); citing Battle v.

Richardson v. Tricom Pictures & Productions, Inc.

334 F. Supp. 2d 1303 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Aug 24, 2004

See also Brown v. A.J. Gerrard Mfg. Co., 715 F.2d 1549 (11th Cir.1983) (en banc) (per curiam). In E.E.O.C. v. … See, e.g., Brown v. A.J. Gerrard Mfg. Co., 715 F.2d 1549 (11th Cir.1983) (en banc) (per curiam). Under the NLRA there has been a consistent practice of awarding prejudgment interest on back pay awards.